- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 19,194
- Location
- Western Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Catholic
- Political Affiliation
- Moderate
- Marital Status
- Single
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
I am seeing what you are saying.. you think that mercy is directly tied to a response to sin. When I rescue a child drowning in water, it is out of love not a response to their sin, which I don't believe is in this instance. Mercy is showing love. It is not directly related to evidence of sin.
You cannot rescue a drowning child from the waters if there is no child and no waters. It is not sin specifically that is needed for mercy but a creature in need of it. If there are no creatures then no mercy can be shown to them. As it happens creatures need mercy from God because of sins, not necessarily because of some specific sin of their own but because of sins and the curse that came from the first sin. Romans chapter five explains the the relationship between the first sin and subsequent sins and Romans chapter eight explains the implications for the whole of creation.