No Whites Allowed

[Lees]

The Boston mayor, a person 'of color' sent out invitations to other Boston politicians who were 'persons of color' to attend a holiday party. In other words, whites are excluded.

Of course many are complaining about this since division is already rampant in America. And such actions of the Boston mayor simply add to that division.

Myself, it doesn't bother me. I think the 'people of color', which just means anyone not white, should be able to have groups, and celebrations for themselves to enjoy without any white people there. No problem.

But...the problem lies in that these same 'people of color' will raze holy hell if whites do that. Can you imagine the reaction of these if a white mayor inviting only white politicians he knows, to the exclusion of 'people of color', to a holiday celebration? There would be rioting in the streets. What hypocrisy these 'people of color' reveal. But it's not like most don't know it.

But, as I said, I'm all for it. Let the people of color have their own things with the exclusion of the white people. And the white people can have their own things at the exclusion of the people of color. No problem...right? White people don't need a token person of color at every event they have. It's for whites only.

You see? Probably not. All this talk about diversity by liberals is just a line of bull.... By diversity, they mean diverse people of color. And whites are excluded.

My opinion.

Lees

 

[Messy3]

They can come as black Pete maybe to break the ice.

 

[Lamb]

Was this a private party?

 

[Lees]

Was this a private party?

It was a party only for the Boston elected officials of color, from the Mayor.

The one given the responsibility to send out the emails of invitation, apparently send them to all elected officials, many who were white. So she then had to correct that and send out emails letting people know it is a 'people of color' only party.

The fact that this was a 'people of color only' doesn't bother me. But the fact that if this had been only a party for white officials, these same 'people of color' would be raising hell about it, does bother me. I can hear the Squad hen house now. Feathers flying.

In other words, it's cultural and good when people of color do it. But when white people do it, it's racist. How hypocritical and dangerous. This is a clear signal that when 'people of color' are in power, they exercise their racism against the whites.

Lees

 

[Lamb]

I looked up more info about this and it's a long-standing traditional party...but it's also private, meaning it's not a state held party.

 

[Messy3]

It was a party only for the Boston elected officials of color, from the Mayor.

The one given the responsibility to send out the emails of invitation, apparently send them to all elected officials, many who were white. So she then had to correct that and send out emails letting people know it is a 'people of color' only party.

The fact that this was a 'people of color only' doesn't bother me. But the fact that if this had been only a party for white officials, these same 'people of color' would be raising hell about it, does bother me. I can hear the Squad hen house now. Feathers flying.

In other words, it's cultural and good when people of color do it. But when white people do it, it's racist. How hypocritical and dangerous. This is a clear signal that when 'people of color' are in power, they exercise their racism against the whites.

Lees

I think it's always bad. Not if you happen to only have such friends, but to say someone who is white is not welcome is just like what that guy from the KKK said.

 

[Albion]

I think it's always bad. Not if you happen to only have such friends, but to say someone who is white is not welcome is just like what that guy from the KKK said.

It may not be a governmental function, strictly speaking, but it is a tradition among the elected officials in the area. And she is widely known as their colleague and leader in the local government.

Thus, she's not simply some private party who can be expected to invite only her personal friends to a party that she just decided to hold.

 

[Stravinsk]

The Boston mayor, a person 'of color' sent out invitations to other Boston politicians who were 'persons of color' to attend a holiday party. In other words, whites are excluded.

Of course many are complaining about this since division is already rampant in America. And such actions of the Boston mayor simply add to that division.

Myself, it doesn't bother me. I think the 'people of color', which just means anyone not white, should be able to have groups, and celebrations for themselves to enjoy without any white people there. No problem.

But...the problem lies in that these same 'people of color' will raze holy hell if whites do that. Can you imagine the reaction of these if a white mayor inviting only white politicians he knows, to the exclusion of 'people of color', to a holiday celebration? There would be rioting in the streets. What hypocrisy these 'people of color' reveal. But it's not like most don't know it.

But, as I said, I'm all for it. Let the people of color have their own things with the exclusion of the white people. And the white people can have their own things at the exclusion of the people of color. No problem...right? White people don't need a token person of color at every event they have. It's for whites only.

You see? Probably not. All this talk about diversity by liberals is just a line of bull.... By diversity, they mean diverse people of color. And whites are excluded.

My opinion.

Lees

Get used to it, my Jew loving board member. How many blacks and arabs are behind the following?

Anti White Agenda (43 Commercials Showing The White Man As Weak Morons - GoyimTV

Who owns google? Muslims? Blacks?

Image search: "happy white woman" on google:

Welcome to the war on whites (esp males) by your favorite people.

 

[Lees]

I looked up more info about this and it's a long-standing traditional party...but it's also private, meaning it's not a state held party.

'Longstanding'? Yeah, I read that too. Define that.

'Not a state held party'? Yet the email was sent out from her office, by one employed by the City.

Does that mean if white elected officials started a 'private' party for themselves, designated 'for white elected people', that it would be ok?

As I said, I am all for it. It is the hypocrisy of the 'people of color', had the shoe been on the other foot, that I despise.

NAACP NAAWP Which one is racist?

Lees

 

[Lees]

I think it's always bad. Not if you happen to only have such friends, but to say someone who is white is not welcome is just like what that guy from the KKK said.

I don't think there is anything wrong with it. The wrong lies in the hypocrisy of the 'people of color' if the party was for white elected officials only.

I encourage 'people of color only', and 'whites only'.

Lees

 

[Lees]

Get used to it, my Jew loving board member. How many blacks and arabs are behind the following?

Anti White Agenda (43 Commercials Showing The White Man As Weak Morons - GoyimTV

Who owns google? Muslims? Blacks?

Image search: "happy white woman" on google:





Welcome to the war on whites (esp males) by your favorite people.

Let's see, if I am a Jew lover, because my opinion of Israel is Biblical, does that make you a Jew hater? Please answer.

There are many black anti-white movements. And, Muslims have their own agenda against all who are not Muslim.

My Biblical view of Israel and the Jews does not mean I condone everything any Jew does. How silly. But, it means my Biblical view of Israel and the Jews does not change.

I'm quite familiar with the war on whites. And isn't it strange that many who support it are white.

Lees

 

[Stravinsk]

Let's see, if I am a Jew lover, because my opinion of Israel is Biblical, does that make you a Jew hater? Please answer.

You think your opinion is biblical, but I've already pointed it out elsewhere in quoting Christ's words that it isn't. You just ignore what Christ said about Rabbinic Judaism.

You're interpretation of the modern secular state of Israel isn't biblical in my opinion. It's an interpretation of scriptures that certainly not everyone holds.

You mentioned in another post that one must basically be a Zionist to be a Christian. That's quite amusing, seeing as how most of Christianity was not Zionist for well over 1600 years, and Jews had (at best) secondary status in Christian nations, being kicked out of them over 1000 times for the trouble they caused.

Do I hate Jews? If a man told me he was a Jew, I would not automatically hate him, although it would be highly likely he held opinions and associations that I would indeed hate.

There are many black anti-white movements. And, Muslims have their own agenda against all who are not Muslim.

And of those blacks and Muslims, which ones hold the power over large corporations to frame advertisements as the link showed? Most of corporate America is owned by mega corporations that are indeed owned by Jews...and those people are the ones pushing white guilt, white shame, degrading the white male and encouraging the white female to mate with black men - specifically black men.

It is a hatred of people from European decent.

The same powerful Jews also push homosexuality (as they did in Wiemar Germany), gender confusion/androgyny (as they did in Wiemar Germany), and transgenderism. They push "black lives matter" bs (George Soros) to cause division. I've heard Soros has even pushed white supremacy also to further division. He's one of your favorite people, by the way, a Jew.

My Biblical view of Israel and the Jews does not mean I condone everything any Jew does. How silly. But, it means my Biblical view of Israel and the Jews does not change.

I'm quite familiar with the war on whites. And isn't it strange that many who support it are white.

Lees

It's not strange to me. White people of European decent are conditioned to feel guilt based on the lies and storytelling of the Jews. We are not given an accurate history in either government funded schools, in popular media or in movies.

 

[Lamb]

'Longstanding'? Yeah, I read that too. Define that.

'Not a state held party'? Yet the email was sent out from her office, by one employed by the City.

Does that mean if white elected officials started a 'private' party for themselves, designated 'for white elected people', that it would be ok?

As I said, I am all for it. It is the hypocrisy of the 'people of color', had the shoe been on the other foot, that I despise.

NAACP NAAWP Which one is racist?

Lees

I think it's unethical for them to have used the state employee as well as the state email to send out the invites.

 

[Lees]

You think your opinion is biblical, but I've already pointed it out elsewhere in quoting Christ's words that it isn't. You just ignore what Christ said about Rabbinic Judaism.

You're interpretation of the modern secular state of Israel isn't biblical in my opinion. It's an interpretation of scriptures that certainly not everyone holds.

You mentioned in another post that one must basically be a Zionist to be a Christian. That's quite amusing, seeing as how most of Christianity was not Zionist for well over 1600 years, and Jews had (at best) secondary status in Christian nations, being kicked out of them over 1000 times for the trouble they caused.

Do I hate Jews? If a man told me he was a Jew, I would not automatically hate him, although it would be highly likely he held opinions and associations that I would indeed hate.


And of those blacks and Muslims, which ones hold the power over large corporations to frame advertisements as the link showed? Most of corporate America is owned by mega corporations that are indeed owned by Jews...and those people are the ones pushing white guilt, white shame, degrading the white male and encouraging the white female to mate with black men - specifically black men.

It is a hatred of people from European decent.

The same powerful Jews also push homosexuality (as they did in Wiemar Germany), gender confusion/androgyny (as they did in Wiemar Germany), and transgenderism. They push "black lives matter" bs (George Soros) to cause division. I've heard Soros has even pushed white supremacy also to further division. He's one of your favorite people, by the way, a Jew.


It's not strange to me. White people of European decent are conditioned to feel guilt based on the lies and storytelling of the Jews. We are not given an accurate history in either government funded schools, in popular media or in movies.

I know my opinion is Biblical. Christ's words are not in disagreement with my view, as I also showed you elsewhere.

Yes, the Christian should be supportive for the nation Israel. It is God bringing them back to the land, though in unbelief. It is preparatory for God to begin the end time events.

The emphasis of God in the early years of Christianity was the spreading of the Gospel in order to build Christ's Church. Both revelation and knowledge of the Bible is progressive. Much more is understood today of the end time events. Christians also persecuted and killed other Christians for the trouble they caused. Why? They didn't know and understand.

Gee, think of that. You don't hate every Jew. Well, guess what, I don't love every Jew.

As I said, I don't condone what every Jew does. And no matter what any one Jew does, I am not going to change my Biblical view of Israel and the Jews, that the Christian needs to be supportive of them. That doesn't mean I support the wrongs done by Jews.

To say the Jews are 'my favorite people' is misleading. They are the physical chosen race of God. They are the people in whom the blessings and curses of God are found. God has given them that land Palestine forever. And they will have it forever. That is my view of Israel and the Jews.

Well, I agree that whites, especially in the U.S., have been lazy in their history. And that they are being conditioned by every sort of media available. But there comes a time when you grow up and do some study of your own. But most don't.

Lees

 

[Messy3]

I don't think there is anything wrong with it. The wrong lies in the hypocrisy of the 'people of color' if the party was for white elected officials only.

I encourage 'people of color only', and 'whites only'.

Lees

We had a guy in church. He's 1/2 or 1/4 Indonesian. We call that an Indo. He looked quite Indonesian. He said that in primary school he was searching for his brother, who was really white and looked Dutch and some teacher said: No that is not your brother! I guess we should split them up at a party. Move it! You look too Indonesian! Or why not in church. I brought my brother to church today! Move it! Go whiteface if you want to come in.

 

[Lees]

We had a guy in church. He's 1/2 or 1/4 Indonesian. We call that an Indo. He looked quite Indonesian. He said that in primary school he was searching for his brother, who was really white and looked Dutch and some teacher said: No that is not your brother! I guess we should split them up at a party. Move it! You look too Indonesian! Or why not in church. I brought my brother to church today! Move it! Go whiteface if you want to come in.

As I said, I am not against people of color or white people having their own activities or social gatherings based upon their race, in exclusion of the other race. People like to be around their own kind. Nothing wrong with that.

If the school you presented in your story had made it clear that it was 'whites only' then there never would have been a problem. Or if the Church you presented was 'people of color' only, there never would have been a problem.

Lees

 

[Messy3]

As I said, I am not against people of color or white people having their own activities or social gatherings based upon their race, in exclusion of the other race. People like to be around their own kind. Nothing wrong with that.

If the school you presented in your story had made it clear that it was 'whites only' then there never would have been a problem. Or if the Church you presented was 'people of color' only, there never would have been a problem.

Lees

Really? There are white and black churches, but that's because most, not all, black people don't want to go to a boring white service. The white church services here are often more dull. Boring talking, very quiet music. But it also depends. I like the mixed ones. White churches are dull. But I went to one with mainly Indonesians, expecting a fun bunch. That one was worse than a white church. Anyway if a church would tell you you're not welcome, because you have the wrong color, that is really bad. The mainly black churches also have a few white who like to party. If they kick someone out because of their color they kicked God out too. Jesus may have had olive skin.

 

[Lees]

Really? There are white and black churches, but that's because most, not all, black people don't want to go to a boring white service. The white church services here are often more dull. Boring talking, very quiet music. But it also depends. I like the mixed ones. White churches are dull. But I went to one with mainly Indonesians, expecting a fun bunch. That one was worse than a white church. Anyway if a church would tell you you're not welcome, because you have the wrong color, that is really bad. The mainly black churches also have a few white who like to party. If they kick someone out because of their color they kicked God out too. Jesus may have had olive skin.

Yes, really. Do I, a white person, need to act like a black person, to prove 'spirituality'. How stupid.

Interesting that you say 'boring white service', 'dull'. By your own words, you are voicing approval of 'people of color' churches over 'white' churches. Which is a distinction of the physical.

I have been to many white services that are boring. But I have been to many that are Spirit filled. The skin color was not the factor. But the way 'people of color' react to services, and the way 'white people' react are very different. Why? Because God has made the racial difference.
Black people don't want to go to white churches because they are black and whites are white. Each race has it's on characteristics that you cannot ignore. Though stupid whites like to pretend they don't exist, because it makes them look so 'spiritual'.

Your problem with you going to an Indonesian church is that you were looking for a good time instead of worship towards God. By your own words. You just wanted 'fun'.

Lees

 

[Messy3]

Yes, really. Do I, a white person, need to act like a black person, to prove 'spirituality'. How stupid.

Interesting that you say 'boring white service', 'dull'. By your own words, you are voicing approval of 'people of color' churches over 'white' churches. Which is a distinction of the physical.

I have been to many white services that are boring. But I have been to many that are Spirit filled. The skin color was not the factor. But the way 'people of color' react to services, and the way 'white people' react are very different. Why? Because God has made the racial difference.
Black people don't want to go to white churches because they are black and whites are white. Each race has it's on characteristics that you cannot ignore. Though stupid whites like to pretend they don't exist, because it makes them look so 'spiritual'.

Your problem with you going to an Indonesian church is that you were looking for a good time instead of worship towards God. By your own words. You just wanted 'fun'.

Lees

Yeah girls just wanna have fun. Come on now. If the Holy Spirit is not there it is dull.
It's not a Biblical law to sit still and preach dull.

 

[Lees]

Yeah girls just wanna have fun. Come on now. If the Holy Spirit is not there it is dull.
It's not a Biblical law to sit still and preach dull.

When gathering with saints to worship God and Christ, I am not interested in having fun. I want to worship and be in His presence. Which brings about a stillness, a natural bowing before Him, a natural shutting of ones mouth before a Holy God.

Loudness, and shouting or screaming, or excitement, is not synonymous with being spiritual. Those are all soulish manifestations. Easily produced without the Holy Spirit.

Preaching that is led by the Holy Spirit is never dull. Many today who preach are not led by the Spirit, making it dull. Everything in the Church should be done in an orderly fashion. (1 Cor. 14:40)

(Nehemiah 8:1-12)

Lees