REDEMPTION/ATONEMENT: US vs THEM (the L of TULIP)

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Nowhere does it say a few or many? Try... Matthew 20:28 NKJV just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many."


@prism, Thanks for agreeing with me.

Yup, it's undeniable, isn't it? Over and over again, the Bible verbatim, flat-out STATES that Jesus died for ALL. And nowhere does it state, "No, Jesus did not die for all but ONLY exclusively, solely, for some few." The "L" dogma is entirely absent from Scripture and flat out contradicts Scripture.

"Many" does not mean "only some unknown few." "Many people live on earth" does not mean "Only a small few of people live on the earth." The verse you quote perhaps does contradict the "L" dogma, but it does not contradict where Scripture repeatedly and flat-out states that He died for all.



.
 
Last edited:

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I'm going to try this again
Because not all believe and accept His offer. 1 Timothy says pray for all man, cause God wants everyone saved, yet not everyone is saved.
He died for half a bride?
 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
@prism, Thanks for agreeing with me.

Yup, it's undeniable, isn't it? Over and over again, the Bible verbatim, flat-out STATES that Jesus died for ALL. And nowhere does it state, "No, Jesus did not die for all but ONLY exclusively, solely, for some few." The "L" dogma is entirely absent from Scripture and flat out contradicts Scripture.

"Many" does not mean "only some unknown few." "Many people live on earth" does not mean "Only a small few of people live on the earth." The verse you quote perhaps does contradict the "L" dogma, but it does not contradict where Scripture repeatedly and flat-out states that He died for all.



.
Did He not die for those He foreknew would believe, for those He predestined to life?...

Acts 13:48 ESV
And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.

...'as many as',
doesn't mean ALL.
 

Messy

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 18, 2023
Messages
1,553
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I'm going to try this again

He died for half a bride?
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Did He not die for those He foreknew would believe, for those He predestined to life?...


@prism Yes, and for those He knew would not. The Bible says "ALL".

Here's what God literally, flat-out, verbatim, in black-and-white, repeatedly states:

1 John 2:2 He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.

John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

Hebrews 2:9 But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.

2 Corinthians 5:14 For the love of Christ controls us, because we have concluded this: that one has died for all

2 Corinthians 5:15 And he died for all.

1 Timothy 2:6 "Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all.

There are more.

There are NO verses that state, "No, Jesus did not die for all but only for some."

The reason some are not personally justified is NOT that the Bible is wrong about Jesus dying for all but rather because the Bible is right about faith not being in all. Yes, not all are appointed to believe but Jesus did die for all, at least that's what God says and what Christianity believed for 1600 years (and nearly all still does).



Acts 13:48 ESV
And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.

Yes, the Bible repeatedly says that some are appointed to believe. It does not state, "Jesus died ONLY for them" it repeatedly, verbatim, flat-out STATES He died for all.



...'as many as', doesn't mean ALL.


No one claims that "ALL" are appointed to believe. And that's not the issue here. The issue is the "L" of TULIP, the dogma that Jesus did NOT die for all (as the Bible repeatedly, verbatim states) but ONLY for some few. Try to stay on topic; you keep trying to change the subject to different issues, issues that no one disputes. You bring up a verse about believing and then try to apply it to an entirely, completely different issue.


Blessings on your Easter celebration.


- Josiah



.
 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
If some are predestinated to life, it seems to be a moot point to argue that Christ died for all unless one is willing to ludicrously say that God predestined all.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
If some are predestinated to life, it seems to be a moot point to argue that Christ died for all unless one is willing to ludicrously say that God predestined all.


Predestination refers to the gift of faith, not the Cross.

No one claims that all are predestined to be given faith. But virtually all Christians accept the Bible is correct when it says that Jesus died for all.


.
 

spasausinh

New member
Joined
Apr 20, 2023
Messages
1
Location
Viet Nam
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Buddhist
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Your article is very interesting, I got a lot of useful information from it, I look forward to your next articles. Thank.
 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Predestination refers to the gift of faith, not the Cross.
How in the world do you separate faith from the cross?
Can you separate Christ from His Work?

Do you have Scriptural backup for your statement? "Predestination refers to the gift of faith, not the Cross."?

And even if predestination refers to faith, it would still leave us with limited atonement...designed for those who were predestined to faith.
 
Last edited:

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
How in the world do you separate faith from the cross?


@prism


Because they aren't the same thing.

TWO things are required for personal justification:
1. The Cross (the atoning work of Christ - His incarnation, death and resurrection)
2. Personal faith that apprehends/relies/applies the above to self.
It's not either/or. It's both/and.
BOTH are necessary for personal justification, although they are not the same thing.

While the Bible specifically, verbatim, flat-out, repeatedly STATES that Jesus died "FOR ALL", it also states that faith is not found in all.
The first is universal, the second is not.
The reason some are not personally justified is that some don't have faith. The reason is the absence of faith, not Christ.



limited atonement...designed for those who were predestined to faith.


1. The ONLY ones who insist that all are personally justified are radical Calvinists who invented universalism because like other radical Calvinists, they hold that faith is irrelevant and that if Christ died for you then you are justified - even if you repudiate and reject and deny Christ rather than have faith. You seem to be confusing those radical Calvinists with biblical Christianity.

2. No one here is stating that personal justification is universal.

3. You keep TRYING to change the subject. The issue is this: Did Jesus died for all as the Bible repeatedly, verbatim, flat-out states? OR is that not true and rather Jesus died ONLY for some unknown few? @prism, that is the issue. That's what the invention of the "L" in TULIP is all about, rejecting that Jesus died for all.




Here's what God literally, flat-out, verbatim, in black-and-white, repeatedly states:

1 John 2:2 He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.

John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

Hebrews 2:9 But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.

2 Corinthians 5:14 For the love of Christ controls us, because we have concluded this: that one has died for all

2 Corinthians 5:15 And he died for all.

1 Timothy 2:6 "Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all.

There are more.

There are NO verses that state, "No, Jesus did not die for all but only for some."

The reason some are not personally justified is NOT that the Bible is wrong about Jesus dying for all but rather because the Bible is right about faith not being in all. Yes, not all are appointed to believe but Jesus did die for all, at least that's what God says and what Christianity believed for 1600 years (and nearly all still does).




.
 
Last edited:

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Predestination refers to the gift of faith, not the Cross.

No one claims that all are predestined to be given faith. But virtually all Christians accept the Bible is correct when it says that Jesus died for all.


.
So you are trying to say that Jesus died for all, but predestined some to faith?
What in the world does that mean?
Faith in what/who?
God regenerates those who He predestined to faith only to allow them to walk away?
That doesn't sound like any kind of predestinated faith to me.

Acts 13:48 ESV
And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.

You keep TRYING to change the subject.
That's because I can't reconcile Christ dying 'for all's on the one hand, and 'predestinating some' on the other hand...

Romans 8:29-30 ESV
For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. [30] And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
So you are trying to say that Jesus died for all, but predestined some to faith?
There's nothing impossible or even difficult in that. IF predestination is a fact, God's choice would be for his Elect to receive Faith, which is the vehicle that saves, and for him to not make that same decision in the case of other people.

God regenerates those who He predestined to faith only to allow them to walk away?
That doesn't sound like any kind of predestinated faith to me.
We accept that it does not sound right to you...because you've told us this more than once. But the way you insist upon paraphrasing what Josiah and other people have explained before replying is not helping. We recognize that it's possible to argue that some POV is illogical or wrong if you change it somewhat and then declare it to be unpersuasive.

And even if predestination refers to faith, it would still leave us with limited atonement...designed for those who were predestined to faith.
No, it wouldn't. It would leave us with limited salvation, or to put it better, it would leave us with a predetermined limit on the number of people who will be saved.

Regardless of which side of the issue one takes, until the terms (justification, atonement, salvation, faith, etc.) are understood as separate, not interchangeable, concepts...there's not going to be anything resolved here.
 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
There's nothing impossible or even difficult in that. IF predestination is a fact, God's choice would be for his Elect to receive Faith, which is the vehicle that saves, and for him to not make that same decision in the case of other people.
IOW, only the elect are saved, known only by God before the foundation of the world. Therefore, in time, during His Incarnation, He died knowing whom the Father had given Him. His death was for the elect.
But then again you placed a big IF before predestination. Why?
But the way you insist upon paraphrasing what Josiah and other people have explained before replying is not helping
Your answering for Josiah is also not helpful.
We recognize that it's possible to argue that some POV is illogical or wrong if you change it somewhat and then declare it to be unpersuasive.
What have I changed or misparaphrased? Maybe I can clarify.
No, it wouldn't. It would leave us with limited salvation, or to put it better, it would leave us with a predetermined limit on the number of people who will be saved.
Am I hearing you say that predestined faith applies to groups and not individuals? Please explain.
Regardless of which side of the issue one takes, until the terms (justification, atonement, salvation, faith, etc.) are understood as separate, not interchangeable, concepts...there's not going to be anything resolved here.
Yes, and predestination is not limited to faith...

Romans 8:29-30 ESV
For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers. [30] And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
IOW, only the elect are saved, known only by God before the foundation of the world.
That is the theory.
Therefore, in time, during His Incarnation, He died knowing whom the Father had given Him. His death was for the elect.
That is the theory.
But then again you placed a big IF before predestination. Why?
Because it's only a theory. One of the problems with these threads and this topic is that the several posters who believe in the theory, and who post about almost nothing else, can't agree among themselves what, exactly, it is that they believe about it.

Am I hearing you say that predestined faith applies to groups and not individuals? Please explain.
There's nothing special there. The belief is that God preselected those who would be saved, but not that there is a certain number known to us.

Yes, and predestination is not limited to faith...
I'm not even sure what you mean by that. It is believed that those who are predestined will come to the true Faith during their lives and be saved just as the majority of Christians who do not believe in Calvinist predestination accept that salvation is accomplished through Faith in Christ and his sacrifice on Calvary.
 
Last edited:

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
So you are trying to say that Jesus died for all, but predestined some to faith?
What in the world does that mean?

@prism

It means Jesus died for all. As the Bible so clearly, verbatim, repeatedly states. And as Christianity has affirmed (made dogma at an Ecumenical Council).

It means that not all are predestined to have faith.



Acts 13:48 ESV
And when the Gentiles heard this, they began rejoicing and glorifying the word of the Lord, and as many as were appointed to eternal life believed.

Yup. READ what you quoted. What are they appointed to do? Have Jesus die for them or to believe?



That's because I can't reconcile Christ dying 'for all's on the one hand, and 'predestinating some' on the other hand...

That's your problem. Not the Bible's. Not God's. Not Christianity's. I can't "reconcile" how God is one but three either, does that mean it's wrong? Maybe it just means my finite, sinful, limited, puny, fallen brain can't wrap itself around the information I have. My 5 year old son can't reconcile how a planet can rotate around a star.... I've tried to explain it, but....



Here's what God literally, flat-out, verbatim, in black-and-white, repeatedly states:

1 John 2:2 He is the propitiation for our sins, and not for ours only but also for the sins of the whole world.

John 3:16 “For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life.

Hebrews 2:9 But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.

2 Corinthians 5:14 For the love of Christ controls us, because we have concluded this: that one has died for all

2 Corinthians 5:15 And he died for all.

1 Timothy 2:6 "Christ Jesus, who gave himself as a ransom for all.

There are more.

There are NO verses that state, "No, Jesus did not die for all but only for some."


If you need to change the topic AGAIN (this time to predestination) rather than address the issue of this thread, then check this out: https://www.christianityhaven.com/threads/predestination.13697/ BUT, friend, IF you approach it with "it's not true if I can't reconcile everything" then... well... don't bother with this (or pretty much any other doctrine of Christianity).





.


 
Last edited:

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Because it's only a theory. One of the problems with these threads and this topic is that the several posters who believe in the theory, and who post about almost nothing else, can't agree among themselves what, exactly, it is that they believe about it.
So are you saying your 'theory/interpretation' is true while many other theories are lacking because they lack mutual agreement?
There's nothing special there. The belief is that God preselected those who would be saved, but not that there is a certain number known to us.
I don't believe I ever said we know who are the elect. God knows who are His...we don't with any kind of certainty.
I'm not even sure what you mean by that. It is believed that those who are predestined will come to the true Faith during their lives and be saved just as the majority of Christians who do not believe in Calvinist predestination accept that salvation is accomplished through Faith in Christ and his sacrifice on Calvary.
Yes, Calvinism isn't necessary to believe to be saved. We are not saved by our doctrinal theories, they can be useful to make sense of the whole panorama of Scripture.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I don't believe I ever said we know who are the elect. God knows who are His...we don't with any kind of certainty.

Correct. So, if the "L" dogma you promote is true, then no one can know if Christ died for them, if the Gospel is for them, if forgiveness and grace and mercy are available for them, if faith is actually apprehending something that is for them. What a horrible doctrine. But of course, the Bible specifically states the exact opposite of this "L" invention.



.



 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
It means that not all are predestined to have faith.
So those who are not 'predestined to faith', Christ died for?
Yup. READ what you quoted. What are they appointed to do? Have Jesus die for them or to believe?
So how does one obtain eternal life, without Christ dying for their sin?
That's your problem. Not the Bible's. Not God's. Not Christianity's. I can't "reconcile" how God is one but three either, does that mean it's wrong? Maybe it just means my finite, sinful, limited, puny, fallen brain can't wrap itself around the information I have. My 5 year old son can't reconcile how a planet can rotate around a star.... I've tried to explain it, but....
One is a contradiction of human logic, where the Trinity goes beyond human logic.
Here's what God literally, flat-out, verbatim, in black-and-white, repeatedly states:
Ok, He died for all, but chooses some. Makes sense (tongue in cheek)
There are NO verses that state, "No, Jesus did not die for all but only for some."
Yes, but there are many verses that speak in terms of 'predestination', 'election', 'remnant', 'God's choice', 'potter/clay', etc.
 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Correct. So, if the "L" dogma you promote is true, then no one can know if Christ died for them, if the Gospel is for them, if forgiveness and grace and mercy are available for them, if faith is actually apprehending something that is for them. What a horrible doctrine. But of course, the Bible specifically states the exact opposite of this "L" invention.
Those whom Christ dies for, He regenerates and they know beyond a shadow of a doubt. (Something I never learned in the Lutheran Church)...

Romans 8:15-16 ESV
For you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear, but you have received the Spirit of adoption as sons, by whom we cry, "Abba! Father!" [16] The Spirit himself bears witness with our spirit that we are children of God,

2 Corinthians 5:17 ESV
Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come.
 
Top Bottom