Already it's beginning to look as though having the tax returns made public was the main objective of Trump's enemies, not what's revealed by them.
Most people don't follow the news with real care but instead take what the commentator says about whatever it is. Already in this case, I have heard several talking heads "reporting" that what the tax returns show is ________ (fill in that blank with various "off the cuff" observations).
For example, one said, with great seriousness, that Trump's returns showed him to be a bad businessman, not the business wizard he was thought to be. The evidence? Apparently, he was in the plus column for two of the years in question while he was devoting his time to being president of the United States, but in the red for the other three. However, the purpose for demanding his returns be made public was supposed to be to reveal criminal actions on his part.
And then there is the matter of him promising not to take his salary, or because the Treasury is required by law to send it, of him promising to send it back. While I could find no liberal source that said anything other than that he didn't follow through (Time, WashPost, CNN, etc.), other sources reported that government records from the various government agencies document that he
did make those contributions (back to the government, in other words). See the following report for more:
'$400,000'
checkyourfact.com