Seems that the Nicene Creed is much better.
Does not include the dubious statement of descent into Hell. Also a bit more detailed that the Apostles' Creed.Why is it better?
Does not include the dubious statement of descent into Hell. Also a bit more detailed that the Apostles' Creed.
I was not aware of this verse for the subject question at the time I posted. However, I am not convinced this is saying He descended into Hell. Lower parts of the land or earth might simply be saying that he came down from Heaven (the incarnation). His birth was in the lower parts of society (horse barn in town instead of a castle). So, I don't know.“I, therefore, the prisoner of the Lord, beseech you to walk worthy of the calling with which you were called, But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of Christ’s gift. Therefore He says: “When He ascended on high, He led captivity captive, And gave gifts to men.” (Now this, “He ascended” —what does it mean but that He also first descended into the lower parts of the earth? He who descended is also the One who ascended far above all the heavens, that He might fill all things.)”
-Ephesians 4:1,7-10 - Bible Gateway passage: Ephesians 4:1, Ephesians 4:7-10 - New King James Version
I was not aware of this verse for the subject question at the time I posted. However, I am not convinced this is saying He descended into Hell. Lower parts of the land or earth might simply be saying that he came down from Heaven (the incarnation). His birth was in the lower parts of society (horse barn in town instead of a castle). So, I don't know.
Here's an excellent article on this.... I know you've said you don't have interest in reading anything beyond the very short (and this is 9 pages long) but if you actually are interested in the question, it is very good.
The usual text here is 1 Peter 3:18-20. But as the above article explains, it's interpretation is varied and a bit controversal. The article explores that.
No one knows WHY this got into the creed.... obviously, early Christians must have considered this very important but WHY is ... well.... not clear.
And there has been MUCH discussion as to WHY this happened (if it literally did)... WHAT was the purpose. And that too is simply not known (although theories abound)
.
I suppose if we had the understandings of people who lived at the time it was written, we could just read it and know what it means, but remember there is over 1900 years between our culture and the culture in which the New Testament was written. Meanings and phrases have changed. To make it more complicated, some of this has to be sorted out in the translation and it does not always sort out so well. For example, what exactly does "heart of the earth (land)" mean to a man in the first century? Probably need to go to a Jewish man in the first century to get a good understanding. But I have read that it means the land in which Jerusalem sits.Why not just believe what it plainly says?
“For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the belly of the great fish, so will the Son of Man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth.”
-Matthew 12:40 - Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 12:40 - New King James Version
I suppose if we had the understandings of people who lived at the time it was written, we could just read it and know what it means, but remember there is over 1900 years between our culture and the culture in which the New Testament was written. Meanings and phrases have changed. To make it more complicated, some of this has to be sorted out in the translation and it does not always sort out so well. For example, what exactly does "heart of the earth (land)" mean to a man in the first century? Probably need to go to a Jewish man in the first century to get a good understanding. But I have read that it means the land in which Jerusalem sits.
Josiah posted up a good link in defense of the clause "He descended into Hell." So for contrast and to get both sides of the story, here is an article that takes the opposite side:
HE DID NOT DESCEND INTO HELL, A PLEA FOR FOLLOWING THE SCRIPTURE INSTEAD OF THE APOSTLES CREED
What do you mean?The title of this thread makes it sound like Jesus went to hell while he was still on the cross. But that's not the case according to the creed
died, and was buried; he descended to hell
There are two places in scripture that refer to Jesus' descent into hell:
1 Peter 3:18-20; Colossians 2:15
For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit. 19 After being made alive,[a] he went and made proclamation to the imprisoned spirits— 20 to those who were disobedient long ago when God waited patiently in the days of Noah while the ark was being built. In it only a few people, eight in all, were saved through water,
15 And having disarmed the powers and authorities, he made a public spectacle of them, triumphing over them by the cross.
What do you mean?
If you really want to get technical, then yea "when he was buried" is what I meant.
What's the difference? He was buried when he died on the cross.
I don't understand what you're getting at.
It's like me saying "I went to a hotel when I landed in Chicago"
And then you correct me, "No, you went to the hotel when you left the airport, not when you landed."
Ok?
We're just playing the game of technicalities now?
Thanks for telling me. I wouldn't have known otherwise.Jesus wasn't buried on the cross. He actually was taken to a tomb.
Jesus wasn't buried on the cross. He actually was taken to a tomb.