What are the historical inaccuracies in the book of Judith?
- Thread starter NathanH83
- Start date
pinacled
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,862
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
The historicity of the book of judith has nothing to do with "Christian Theolgy"
Perhaps a rephrase of your que is in order so that others are able to join in an honest discourse.
Or are there ulterior motives intended?
pinacled
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,862
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
In an hr the this post time stamp will change from 11:32 to 12:32
NathanH83
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 2,278
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
I’m not taking about the Judge Judy TV show, and you know that.
pinacled
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,862
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
I see more than you are able to comprehend.
NathanH83
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 2,278
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Ok, then answer the question. What mistakes are there in the book of Judith?
pinacled
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,862
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Judy is an actor
NathanH83
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 2,278
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Again, I’m not talking about the TV show. Please stop trolling.
pinacled
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,862
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Like maccabees she is a theatrical work meant for entertainment
pinacled
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,862
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Like achilliese heal
NathanH83
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 2,278
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
What are you talking about? Maccabees is real history, confirmed even by secular historians. Please stop trolling, and list an actual historical mistake in Judith.
NathanH83
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 2,278
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Historical mistakes in Judith.
pinacled
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2015
- Messages
- 2,862
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Non-Denominational
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
NathanH83
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 2,278
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Name 1 mistake in the book of Judith
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Messages
- 13,927
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Lutheran
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
Let's say there ARE historical inaccuracies in a book.... or not.... what great consequence would that have to you? Is it only a matter of history or something more? Do you theorize that any book containing accurate history ergo must be accepted by all people of faith for thousands of years as the inerrant, canonical, inscripturated words of God and thus Scripture?
.
Andrew
Matt 18:15
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
- Messages
- 6,645
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Messages
- 13,927
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Lutheran
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
No. Four books with the common title of "Maccabees" are BOOKS. They CONTAIN history, as millions upon millions of books do. I think many view at least some of that history as factual, as is the case with millions of other books that contain history.
I suspect you are speaking of a specific book with a popular moniker of Judith. That books CONTAINS history (as millions and millions of other books). Some may be factual, perhaps some not.
You seem very, very focused on some books. You bring some up a lot, in thread after thread. Never disclosing your point. Okay, I guess.... we could have a discussion of To Kill a Mockingbird... and include a discussion of how accurate it is portraying history of the south at that time. But I kind of agree with pinacle in asking why is this discussion in the Christian Theology forum? And wondering if you have a point (I've asked many times).
.
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Messages
- 13,927
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Lutheran
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
PERHAPS the point is: Why are we discussing the historicity of a book in THIS specific forum? We could discuss "To Kill a Mockingbird" (a very popular, award winning book) that contains a lot of history, accurate at that, indeed the entirety of the book is a comment on history. But is that specifically Christian Theology?
While I at times disagree with this poster, I think pinacle asked a valid question: Why is the historicity of some book a specific CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY issue? And I don't see what this has to do with the Eastern Orthodox churches.
I'm not a "forum nazi" (LOL) but when I saw the opening post, I had the exact same reaction as pinacle did: why is this specifically CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY? Not that that's a critical thing.... we're lax here at CH (and that's good).
Blessings to you in this holy Easter season....