Walking away.

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,208
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
John 6:60-69 After hearing his doctrine many of the followers of Jesus said, ‘This is intolerable language. How could anyone accept it?’ Jesus was aware that his followers were complaining about it and said, ‘Does this upset you? What if you should see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh has nothing to offer. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life.’ ‘But there are some of you who do not believe.’ For Jesus knew from the outset those who did not believe, and who it was that would betray him. He went on, ‘This is why I told you that no one could come to me unless the Father allows him.’ After this, many of his disciples left him and stopped going with him. Then Jesus said to the Twelve, ‘What about you, do you want to go away too?’ Simon Peter answered, ‘Lord, who shall we go to? You have the message of eternal life, and we believe; we know that you are the Holy One of God.’

Many of the disciples walked away after hearing what Jesus taught. In the passage above the doctrine that Jesus taught was about eating his flesh and drinking his blood. Today many treat the passage as a simile that would offend no one. Back when Jesus said the words his disciples did not treat it that way.

In the many centuries since that time other doctrines have been an occasion for people to walk away. "Hell fire" is one such doctrine. There are entire religions and some denominations that walk away from "hell fire". For many reasons people are offended at the idea that God would punish the wicked eternally. They say it would contradict the teaching that God is Love. They say it is cruel. Some have even gone on to walk away from the idea of an immortal soul and think of death as unconscious sleep for the soul and hell-fire as a lake burning with fires into which the wicked are cast and consumed by the fires but the process allegedly takes a finite time and the punishment is 'eternal' only in the sense that it is final and irrevocable.

Some in more recent times have walked away from the doctrine of baptism making baptism into a public proclamation of one's personal faith despite what Jesus says Nicodemus in Saint John's gospel and what saint Paul writes in his letters about baptism. Some have gone on to separate the Holy Spirit's work of regeneration from baptism with water and invented a new baptism which is variously called "Baptism of the Spirit" and "Baptism with the Spirit". Whole denominations and movements have been born from that walk away from what is written in the holy scriptures.

Of course the people in the denominations that walked away have plenty of theology and many verses from holy scripture to defend the new doctrines that arose from walking away.
 
Last edited:

NewCreation435

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
5,045
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
It's important to look at context. Verses 52-58 before the passage you cited says

52 "Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this man give us His flesh to eat?” 53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. 54 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 55 For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. 56 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me, he also will live because of Me. 58 This is the bread which came down out of heaven; not as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever.”

They got offended at Jesus because it sounded to them like he was proposing some type of canibalism and the whole idea of drinking blood was offensive. Because they heard this literally (which is clear from their comments that they were) they got offended.
This passage has nothing to do with baptism.
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,208
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
It's important to look at context. Verses 52-58 before the passage you cited says

52 "Then the Jews began to argue with one another, saying, “How can this man give us His flesh to eat?” 53 So Jesus said to them, “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in yourselves. 54 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 55 For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. 56 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57 As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me, he also will live because of Me. 58 This is the bread which came down out of heaven; not as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever.”

They got offended at Jesus because it sounded to them like he was proposing some type of canibalism and the whole idea of drinking blood was offensive. Because they heard this literally (which is clear from their comments that they were) they got offended.
This passage has nothing to do with baptism.

It was Jesus' disciples who walked away. Not all of them, obviously, since the apostles stayed but the ones that the passage says walked away were disciples.
 

NewCreation435

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
5,045
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
It was Jesus' disciples who walked away. Not all of them, obviously, since the apostles stayed but the ones that the passage says walked away were disciples.

Yep. I wasn't questioning that.
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,208
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Yep. I wasn't questioning that.

Yes, so while they were Jews they were disciples too and more specifically they were followers of Jesus. They were not hostile to Jesus as were Caiaphas and others.
 

NewCreation435

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
5,045
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Yes, so while they were Jews they were disciples too and more specifically they were followers of Jesus. They were not hostile to Jesus as were Caiaphas and others.

Does it say they were hostile? No. I'm not arguing about that either. Not sure where your getting that idea from. As I said originally they walked away because they were offended by the idea of drinking someone's blood or eating flesh.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
John 6:60-69 After hearing his doctrine many of the followers of Jesus said, ‘This is intolerable language. How could anyone accept it?’ Jesus was aware that his followers were complaining about it and said, ‘Does this upset you? What if you should see the Son of Man ascend to where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life, the flesh has nothing to offer. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life.’ ‘But there are some of you who do not believe.’ For Jesus knew from the outset those who did not believe, and who it was that would betray him. He went on, ‘This is why I told you that no one could come to me unless the Father allows him.’ After this, many of his disciples left him and stopped going with him. Then Jesus said to the Twelve, ‘What about you, do you want to go away too?’ Simon Peter answered, ‘Lord, who shall we go to? You have the message of eternal life, and we believe; we know that you are the Holy One of God.’

Many of the disciples walked away after hearing what Jesus taught. In the passage above the doctrine that Jesus taught was about eating his flesh and drinking his blood. Today many treat the passage as a simile that would offend no one. Back when Jesus said the words his disciples did not treat it that way.

In the many centuries since that time other doctrines have been an occasion for people to walk away. "Hell fire" is one such doctrine. There are entire religions and some denominations that walk away from "hell fire". For many reasons people are offended at the idea that God would punish the wicked eternally. They say it would contradict the teaching that God is Love. They say it is cruel. Some have even gone on to walk away from the idea of an immortal soul and think of death as unconscious sleep for the soul and hell-fire as a lake burning with fires into which the wicked are cast and consumed by the fires but the process allegedly takes a finite time and the punishment is 'eternal' only in the sense that it is final and irrevocable.

Some in more recent times have walked away from the doctrine of baptism making baptism into a public proclamation of one's personal faith despite what Jesus says Nicodemus in Saint John's gospel and what saint Paul writes in his letters about baptism. Some have gone on to separate the Holy Spirit's work of regeneration from baptism with water and invented a new baptism which is variously called "Baptism of the Spirit" and "Baptism with the Spirit". Whole denominations and movements have been born from that walk away from what is written in the holy scriptures.

Of course the people in the denominations that walked away have plenty of theology and many verses from holy scripture to defend the new doctrines that arose from walking away.
Seems you completely ignore the fact that Jesus knew who would believe and who would walk away. Election and predestination right in front of your eyes and you miss it. Hmmm....
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,208
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Seems you completely ignore the fact that Jesus knew who would believe and who would walk away. Election and predestination right in front of your eyes and you miss it. Hmmm....

The topic is walking away. Predestination is your theme it seems. The instances of walking away were The Lord's supper, hell-fire, the persistence of the soul, eternal punishment,and baptism. Somehow you missed all that. Predestination wasn't even mentioned as a "walk away" topic.
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,208
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Yes, so while they were Jews they were disciples too and more specifically they were followers of Jesus. They were not hostile to Jesus as were Caiaphas and others.

Does it say they were hostile? No. I'm not arguing about that either. Not sure where your getting that idea from. As I said originally they walked away because they were offended by the idea of drinking someone's blood or eating flesh.

I wrote that they were NOT hostile, meaning the disciples, while the leaders of the Jews were hostile.
 

MennoSota

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 24, 2017
Messages
7,102
Age
54
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Married
The topic is walking away. Predestination is your theme it seems. The instances of walking away were The Lord's supper, hell-fire, the persistence of the soul, eternal punishment,and baptism. Somehow you missed all that. Predestination wasn't even mentioned as a "walk away" topic.

The saints of God will persevere, MC. Jonah gives us an example of how the saints may fight against the bit, but God directs their path regardless of the fight.
If a person truly walks away from Christianity with no tug from the Spirit of God, you can realize, sadly, that such a person was never given saving faith in the first place. Jesus says the he will never leave nor forsake his saints.
It seems our difference is that I am looking at this from a Godward perspective while you are viewing this from a human perspective.
For Jesus knew from the outset those who did not believe, and who it was that would betray him.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
If the largest denomination adds to or changes the faith of the Apostles, that action is the first and most critical “walking away.“

It then forces those believers who want to continue in the original faith to walk away from it.

That is what caused the Eastern Orthodox to leave the Roman Catholic Church--because the latter had left the historic consensus and modified the faith.

The Reformation then later left what remained of the Catholic church of history when further changes and innovations were made by Rome.

This is the historic pattern. When the larger body walks away, it generates a reaction on the part of those who do not agree to that walking away, i.e. to altering the faith. It is a popular pasttime to argue which denomination is better than the others, but this ^ is the historic fact of the matter.






.
 
Last edited:

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,208
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
If the largest denomination adds to or changes the faith of the Apostles, that action is the first and most critical “walking away.“

It then forces those believers who want to continue in the original faith to walk away from it.

That is what caused the Eastern Orthodox to leave the Roman Catholic Church--because the latter had left the historic consensus and modified the faith.

The Reformation then later left what remained of the Catholic church of history when further changes and innovations were made by Rome.

This is the historic pattern. When the larger body walks away, it generates a reaction on the part of those who do not agree to that walking away, i.e. to altering the faith. It is a popular pasttime to argue which denomination is better than the others, but this ^ is the historic fact of the matter.

Okay, everybody has their perspective on who did what and everybody thinks that "the other guy" walked away from "true christianity". That is not the point though is it?
 
Top Bottom