- Joined
- Jun 12, 2015
- Messages
- 13,927
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Lutheran
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
[MENTION=13]Josiah[/MENTION] writes "See posts 141 and 142. What is posted there (the Lutheran position on justification) is the fundamental disagreement" but MennoSota is not a Lutheran and he did not write posts 141 & 142 MennoSota's disgreement is what he stated it was. Not what Josiah amended it to be in the above quote from Josiah's post. MennoSota is capable of speaking on his own behalf.
The RCC condemned the Lutheran position (see posts 141 and 142), not MennoSota. So the "fundamental disagree" on this issue of Justification is not MennoSota's diversions into some uber-Calvinists views (nor your diversions into things no one disputes) but the issue of the thread: JUSTIFICATION.
If you wish to represent the Catholic perspective, it would be helpful if you would view Posts 141 and 142, copy/paste them, and then CLEARLY indicate (perhaps by embolding or putting into color) the exact statements that are specifically, particularly, clearly "HERESY".... necessitating anathemas, condemnations, and the division of Western Christianity. AGAIN, don't CHANGE the disagreement to: "Yeah, but more should be said - you know, what Lutherans do" but rather "THIS is horrible heresy!" All I see is diversions into issues that are NOT the "fundamental disagreement" on this topic.