Issues of the Reformation: Sacraments

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Sacraments!


Lutherans are “sacramental” (as are Catholics, Eastern Orthodox and Anglican Christians). Understanding such requires a solid embrace of the concepts of God as love and God as the active one - that God blesses us.

“Sacrament” is a theological term loosely referring to any “means of grace.” A “means of grace” is whatever GOD uses to bring faith and strength into our lives - a means through which GOD blesses us. When the Gospel message of the Bible is preached or read or sung or told – it becomes a “tool” of God, something God can use to GIVE us the “gift of faith” and to guide and empower and bless our lives. Yes, our reading or listening or singing involves some “work” on our part (and others) but that’s not the point – GOD is using this like a carpenter using a tool to create something beautiful. While MANY things can be “means of grace” in this loose sense, historically Christians have especially referenced Word and Sacraments as the “Means of Grace.” They are “tools in the hands of the Carpenter” for the granting and strengthening of faith and life.

In and of themselves, they are rather powerless and benign. Like a hammer just lying there. But place that hammer in the hands of a skilled carpenter and GREAT things happen! In the same way, the Bible may seem only like words, Baptism only like water, the Eucharist only like bread and wine. Ah, but they are in the hands of the Carpenter! Who wishes to BLESS us!

In the past 500 years or so, a small minority of Christians have replaced this concept of God blessing us with and opposite concept: “Ordinances”. The focus is placed on man to some extent, where man is the active and critical factor, the emphasis becomes less on God’s unmerited grace and mercy and more on OUR “obedience” and God’s reward of that, thus the redefinition as “Ordinances” (not something God does for us in love but something we do for God in obedience in hopes of reward); OUR jumping through hoops in hopes of pleasing God. Those who see these as Sacraments do so because they see them as Gospel, those that see them as Ordinances do so because they see them as Law. Some Christians “talk past” each other on these points because of this different understanding of God and His grace/mercy.


..... continues in next post




.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
.... continues from above



How Many Sacraments?

Believe it or not, there were literal WARS over this question! An English queen lost her head over this (literally)!

Catholic: Eventually, Christians came to speak of 7 things as especially “Sacraments.” Those 7 are: Baptism, Confirmation, Communion, Confession, Marriage, Ordination and Last Rites/Extreme Unction. In the 16th Century, the RCC declared it a MANDATE that all hold there are EXACTLY seven.

Lutherans: While Lutherans certainly affirm all those (although they don’t necessarily view them all exactly as the Catholic Church does), Luther wouldn’t go along with the “Exactly Seven” mandate. Luther noted that “Sacrament” is a theological term and how you choose to define it impacts how many you come up with. Lutherans define it as especially something instituted by Christ that utilizes some physical means in order to offer or seal His gift of faith and His power in our lives. Catholics now define the word differently. Lutherans don’t dogmatically number them (they don’t dogmatically say how many there are) but historically they've spoken especially of two: Baptism and Holy Communion. But Lutherans “opt out” of the WAR over this question of NUMBER.

Zwingli: He rejected the entire idea of Sacraments (replacing them with “ordinances” – something we do for God, our performance that blessed God). While his followers (some modern “Evangelicals” for example) practice most of the “Seven”, they don’t regard any of them as sacramental and thus teach that there are no Sacraments.


Catholic – Lutheran Agreements and Disagreements

Catholics and Lutherans mostly agree on Baptism and Confession, and they certainly have a mutual very strong embrace of Real Presence in Holy Communion (more on that later). While both Ordain, Lutherans see this primarily as the installation into a divine office whereas Catholics see this as the infusion of special powers and abilities. While both embrace Marriage, Lutherans don’t hold that is a Sacrament since the Father instituted that (not specifically Jesus) and it’s for all people (not just Christians). Both practice Confirmation but Lutherans see that as a time of affirmation and proclamation, Catholics see it as a time of infused power from God. Generally, these disagreements were not “hot button” issues for Catholics and Lutherans and not central to the Reformation. Most of the “debate” was about Transubstantiation….


Catholic and Lutherans on Holy Communion

It’s really important to remember that both Catholics and Lutherans (then and now) stress Christ’s literal, real presence in Communion. Both had a “beef” especially with Zwingli and his “is means isn’t” concept of “symbolic presence” more than they disagreed with each other. For Lutherans and Catholics, the issue was never whether we receive CHRIST in the Sacrament, the issue was whether we should leave the mystery as mystery (and just accept what' said) or substitute some human theory about this. Seems as minor as the whole “how many” issue, doesn’t it? Well, maybe not…


Let’s carefully look at the relevant Scriptures here…

Matthew 26:26-29, “While they were still eating, Jesus took bread, gave thanks and broke it, and gave it to His disciples, saying, ‘Take and eat, this is my body.’ Then He took the cup, (wine) gave thanks and offered it to them saying, ‘Drink from it, all of you. This is my blood of the new covenant which is poured out for many of you for the forgiveness of sins. I tell, I will not drink of this fruit of the vine (wine) again until I drink it anew with you in my Father’s kingdom.”

1 Corinthians 11:23-29, “Jesus took bread, and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, ‘This is my body which is for you, do this in remembrance of me. In the same way, He took the cup saying, ‘This cup is the new covenant in my blood, do this, as often as you drink it, remembering me.’ For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes. Whoever, therefore, eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner is guilty of profaning the body and blood of the Lord. Let a man examine himself, and so eat of the bread and drink of the cup. For anyone who eats and drinks without discerning the body, eats and drinks judgment upon himself.”


.

As Lutherans look at the Scriptures, they believe that the meaning of “is” is “is.” (Yup, it IS just that simple for Lutherans!) Jesus says “This IS my Body… this IS my Blood.” “Is” has to do with reality, existing, being, presence. We believe that Christ is present in the Eucharist, “for real” - and this is the essence of the doctrine of Real Presence. Lutherans accept this “at His word” and as a mystery. They do not even attempt to get into the science or physics of all this (in fact, they totally avoid that; this is mystery, this is a miracle) – they don’t believe we are being cannibals (an early charge against Christians!) and they realize that it doesn’t look or taste like anything other than bread and wine, but they take Jesus at His word – and leave it at that. It’s no more complex than that. Lutherans don’t get into the “when, where, how” of it, the physics or philosophy of it, and they CERTAINLY don’t want to deny any of it. “IS” = is (being, present, exists, real). “Body” = body. “Blood” = blood. Yup.

Now, Lutherans also do not deny that bread and wine are present, too. As they look at the Scriptures, they see that after the Consecration, Lutherans find the realities referred to as bread, wine, body and blood – all FOUR, without any distinction or differentiation, and thus they just accept that all 4 are “real” and “there.” The focus, of course, is entirely on the Body and Blood (so they speak of it as such), the bread and wine are pretty insignificant – maybe even irrelevant (you can have bread and wine any day!) but they accept that bread and wine are “really there,” too. It is only the bread and wine that our senses perceive, but our faith perceives much more!


Transubstantiation?

In the middle ages, some Catholics began to theorize HOW Christ becomes present in the Sacrament. Lots of theories were proposed, and among them was one called “Transubstantiation.” This was not yet dogma in Luther’s time but it was the common “explanation.” Lutherans and Catholics disagreed over it. Essentially, this theory states the bread and wine were converted into the body and blood (in a specific sense) and thus cease to exist in any real or full way (Catholicism says they exist only as an “Aristotelian Accidents” - from the philosopher Aristotle’s theory of accidents); the Catholic Church now speaks only of the “appearance” of bread and wine “remaining” but insists that the bread and wine are not really “there.” The whole point is to deny something being present (something the Bible states after the Consecration). The bread and wine were “transubstantiated” (from the concept of alchemy) into the Body and Blood of Jesus. We should note that the definitive word in the text is not “change” or “into” but “is.” Luther was really uncomfortable with this bold attempt to deny stuff in the text, to mess with the word “is.”

Luther found this theory (coming out of medieval Catholic Scholasticism) to be textually baseless, without Tradition and potentially dangerous. Of course, Lutherans leave the issue exactly where God does, and consider the issue as Mystery, a miracle, but the “danger” comes when “is” doesn’t mean “is’ and stuff in the text must be denied as actually present. It’s too much like Zwingli’s “is means isn’t” view. If we insists that “is” doesn’t mean “is” then we just have various opinions about what Jesus and Paul should have said instead. Luther wanted to protect the “is” as is (real, exists, present) and not endanger that with “is doesn’t mean is but something else.” And of course, that’s exactly what some Christian were saying! Some Protestants eventually embraced the “is doesn’t mean is” view and got caught up in this question Catholics raised: “what actually ISN’T present that the Bible mentions here?” Some Protestants today hold that the bread and wine are “real” but the Body and Blood are not; they are “present” at most in some spiritual or representative or symbolic “sense;” that “is” means “isn’t” and some of what the Bible speaks of “just can’t be present.” Lutherans shiver when hearing that! A “big deal?” I’ll leave that up to you….. Today, Lutherans and Catholics celebrate that they agree on what IS present! Christ! With all His love, mercy, grace, forgiveness and power!


Pax Christi



- Josiah



.
 
Last edited:

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,206
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I am posting this here for information what readers make of it is up to them. I have given the link to the Compendium of the CCC. I hope you benefit from what I've posted and from the link if you click it. God bless

The Compendium of the CCC (Catechism of the Catholic Church) - a summary in question and answer form of the CCC - says

224. What are the sacraments and which are they?
The sacraments, instituted by Christ and entrusted to the Church, are efficacious signs of grace perceptible to the senses . Through them divine life is bestowed upon us. There are seven sacraments: Baptism, Confirmation, Holy Eucharist, Penance, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony.​

225. What is the relationship of the sacraments to Christ?
The mysteries of Christ’s life are the foundations of what he would henceforth dispense in the sacraments, through the ministers of his Church.

“What was visible in our Savior has passed over into his mysteries.” (Saint Leo the Great)​

226. What is the link between the sacraments and the Church?
Christ has entrusted the sacraments to his Church. They are the sacraments “of the Church” in a twofold sense: they are “from her” insofar as they are actions of the Church which is the sacrament of Christ’s action; and they are “for her” in as much as they build up the Church.​

The Seven Sacraments of the Church

The seven sacraments are:
Baptism
Confirmation
Holy Eucharist
Penance
Anointing of the Sick
Holy Orders
Matrimony​
250. How are the sacraments of the Church divided?
The sacraments are divided into: the sacraments of Christian initiation (Baptism, Confirmation, and Holy Eucharist); the sacraments of healing (Penance and Anointing of the Sick);, and the sacraments at the service of communion and mission (Holy Orders and Matrimony). The sacraments touch all the important moments of Christian life. All of the sacraments are ordered to the Holy Eucharist “as to their end” (Saint Thomas Aquinas).​

Other Liturgical Celebrations

THE SACRAMENTALS

351. What are the sacramentals?
These are sacred signs instituted by the Church to sanctify different circumstances of life. They include a prayer accompanied by the sign of the cross and other signs. Among the sacramentals which occupy an important place are: blessings, which are the praise of God and a prayer to obtain his gifts, the consecration of persons and the dedication of things for the worship of God.​
 

TurtleHare

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 29, 2015
Messages
1,057
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
I am posting this here for information what readers make of it is up to them. I have given the link to the Compendium of the CCC. I hope you benefit from what I've posted and from the link if you click it. God bless

The Compendium of the CCC (Catechism of the Catholic Church) - a summary in question and answer form of the CCC - says

224. What are the sacraments and which are they?
The sacraments, instituted by Christ and entrusted to the Church, are efficacious signs of grace perceptible to the senses . Through them divine life is bestowed upon us. There are seven sacraments: Baptism, Confirmation, Holy Eucharist, Penance, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony.​

225. What is the relationship of the sacraments to Christ?
The mysteries of Christ’s life are the foundations of what he would henceforth dispense in the sacraments, through the ministers of his Church.

“What was visible in our Savior has passed over into his mysteries.” (Saint Leo the Great)​

226. What is the link between the sacraments and the Church?
Christ has entrusted the sacraments to his Church. They are the sacraments “of the Church” in a twofold sense: they are “from her” insofar as they are actions of the Church which is the sacrament of Christ’s action; and they are “for her” in as much as they build up the Church.​

The Seven Sacraments of the Church

The seven sacraments are:
Baptism
Confirmation
Holy Eucharist
Penance
Anointing of the Sick
Holy Orders
Matrimony​
250. How are the sacraments of the Church divided?
The sacraments are divided into: the sacraments of Christian initiation (Baptism, Confirmation, and Holy Eucharist); the sacraments of healing (Penance and Anointing of the Sick);, and the sacraments at the service of communion and mission (Holy Orders and Matrimony). The sacraments touch all the important moments of Christian life. All of the sacraments are ordered to the Holy Eucharist “as to their end” (Saint Thomas Aquinas).​

Other Liturgical Celebrations

THE SACRAMENTALS

351. What are the sacramentals?
These are sacred signs instituted by the Church to sanctify different circumstances of life. They include a prayer accompanied by the sign of the cross and other signs. Among the sacramentals which occupy an important place are: blessings, which are the praise of God and a prayer to obtain his gifts, the consecration of persons and the dedication of things for the worship of God.​

Just thinking about this and I wonder could you verify that this is the documentation from the 1500s when the reformation was reforming?
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,206
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Just thinking about this and I wonder could you verify that this is the documentation from the 1500s when the reformation was reforming?

It's from 2005.
 

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

Albion

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
7,760
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Anglican
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The fact is that the 'Seven Sacraments' that have been identified here are a guess. The number of sacraments wasn't decided upon until long after the Christian Church started, and various church leaders speculated that there were somewhere between 2 and 20 or more of them. Finally, the pre-Reformation church settled on 7.

But the bigger point to understand is that there has to be some standard by which to judge. The Catholic Church itself says that the act must have been commissioned by Christ himself, or else it falls into the category (also previously identified here) of a "sacramental" instead of a "sacrament."

The Lord's Supper and Baptism have always been observed in the church as sacraments, and there is no doubt that Christ instituted both of them, regardless of what any of us thinks each of them is all about.

But were the other 5 similarly instituted by Christ himself?
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The fact is that the 'Seven Sacraments' that have been identified here are a guess. The number of sacraments wasn't decided upon until long after the Christian Church started, and various church leaders speculated that there were somewhere between 2 and 20 or more of them. Finally, the pre-Reformation church settled on 7.

But the bigger point to understand is that there has to be some standard by which to judge. The Catholic Church itself says that the act must have been commissioned by Christ himself, or else it falls into the category (also previously identified here) of a "sacramental" instead of a "sacrament."

The Lord's Supper and Baptism have always been observed in the church as sacraments, and there is no doubt that Christ instituted both of them, regardless of what any of us thinks each of them is all about.

But were the other 5 similarly instituted by Christ himself?



Literal WARS have been fought over the number..... Christians have been KILLED for questioning the precise, dogmatic NUMBER.....


Calvin dogmatically insisted there are TWO. The RCC at Trent (a bit after Luther's death) made it DOGMATIC that there are exactly SEVEN. People died as a result. These denominations are now LOCKED into these dogmatic, binding proclamations.


In Luther's day, the general affirmation was the Seven Sacraments - but that number was not dogmatic (it was made so at Trent, the Council to solidify and dogmatize the disagreements with Lutherans). Luther didn't reject the number, only that it's largely a function of how a denomination defines it's own created word and probably doesn't matter THAT much (dogmatically); Luther himself spoke of 2 (Baptism and Communion) AND of 3 (sometimes adding Confession). But the only one from the RCC that Luther rejected as a "Sacrament" is marriage: not at all because he was opposed to marriage but because he didn't consider it something that JESUS instituted nor something ONLY for Christians, he concluded that Jews and even Muslims could be married... and that people were getting married LONG before the birth of Jesus. Other than that, Luther left the issue of "HOW MANY?" open - largely dependent on how the human word is defined. Thus, Lutherans stayed out of the literal WARS that Calvinists and Catholics waged over this. Luther chose not to focus on the NUMBER but the BLESSING.



Pax Christi



- Josiah
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,206
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
This post is for information only. The council of Trent was convened some decades after the excommunication of Martin Luther in 1521 AD which date marks the beginning of formal separation between Martin Luther and his followers from the Catholic Church though informal and actual separation was likely already under way by 1518 or 1519 AD. The council started in 1545 AD and ended in 1563 AD but its sessions were separated by a number of years and wars as well as other upheavals caused the delays evident is its apparent duration. It sat in session December 1545 to March 1547, May 1551 to April 1552, and January 1562 to December 1563.

By 1545 there had already been a peasant's uprising in Austria, parts of Switzerland, and Germany between 1524 and 1525. It resulted in the death of as many as 100,000 peasants at the hands of the armies of the aristocracy. Wikipedia says:

The German Peasants' War, Great Peasants' War or Great Peasants' Revolt (German: Deutscher Bauernkrieg) was a widespread popular revolt in the German-speaking areas of Central Europe from 1524 to 1525. It failed because of the intense opposition by the aristocracy, who slaughtered up to 100,000 of the 300,000 poorly armed peasants and farmers. The survivors were fined and achieved few, if any, of their goals. The war consisted, like the preceding Bundschuh movement and the Hussite Wars, of a series of both economic and religious revolts in which peasants and farmers, often supported by Protestant clergy, took the lead. The German Peasants' War was Europe's largest and most widespread popular uprising prior to the French Revolution of 1789. The fighting was at its height in the middle of 1525.

The war began with separate insurrections, beginning in the southwestern part of what is now Germany and neighboring Alsace, and spread in subsequent insurrections to the central and eastern areas of Germany and present-day Austria. After the uprising in Germany was suppressed, it flared briefly in several Swiss Cantons.

In mounting their insurrection, peasants faced insurmountable obstacles. The democratic nature of their movement left them without a command structure and they lacked artillery and cavalry. Most of them had little, if any, military experience. In combat they often turned and fled, and were massacred by their pursuers. The opposition had experienced military leaders, well-equipped and disciplined armies, and ample funding.

The revolt incorporated some principles and rhetoric from the emerging Protestant Reformation, through which the peasants sought influence and freedom. Historians have interpreted the economic aspects of the German Peasants' War differently, and social and cultural historians continue to disagree on its causes and nature.

There was a rebellion in Munster in 1534 AD and a war between Catholic and German Lutherans between 1546 and 1547. So the historical setting in Europe is useful to know when considering the Council of Trent's canons and decrees.

The following Canons came from the period December 1545 to March 1547.

Canons On The Sacraments In General

Canon 1. If anyone says that the sacraments of the New Law were not all instituted by our Lord Jesus Christ, or that there are more or less than seven, namely, baptism, confirmation, Eucharist, penance, extreme unction, order and matrimony, or that any one of these seven is not truly and intrinsically a sacrament, let him be anathema.

Canon 2. If anyone says that these sacraments of the New Law do not differ from the sacraments of the Old Law, except that the ceremonies are different and the external rites are different, let him be anathema.

Canon 3. If anyone says that these seven sacraments are so equal to each other that one is not for any reason more excellent than the other, let him be anathema.

Canon 4. If anyone says that the sacraments of the New Law are not necessary for salvation but are superfluous, and that without them or without the desire of them men obtain from God through faith alone the grace of justification, though all are not necessary for each one, let him be anathema.

Canon 5. If anyone says that these sacraments have been instituted for the nourishment of faith alone, let him be anathema.

Canon 6. If anyone says that the sacraments of the New Law do not contain the grace which they signify, or that they do not confer that grace on those who place no obstacles in its way, as though they were only outward signs of grace or justice received through faith and certain marks of Christian profession, whereby among men believers are distinguished from unbelievers, let him be anathema.

Canon 7. If anyone says that grace, so far as God's part is concerned, is not imparted through the sacraments always and to all men even if they receive them rightly, but only sometimes and to some persons, let him be anathema.

Canon 8. If anyone says that by the sacraments of the New Law grace is not conferred ex opere operato, but that faith alone in the divine promise is sufficient to obtain grace, let him be anathema.

Canon 9. If anyone says that in three sacraments, namely, baptism, confirmation and order, there is not imprinted on the soul a character, that is, a certain spiritual and indelible mark, by reason of which they cannot be repeated, let him be anathema.

Canon 10. If anyone says that all Christians have the power to administer the word and all the sacraments, let him be anathema.

Canon 11. If anyone says that in ministers, when they effect and confer the sacraments, there is not required at least the intention of doing what the Church does, let him be anathema.

Canon 12. If anyone says that a minister who is in mortal sin, though he observes all the essentials that pertain to the effecting or conferring of a sacrament, neither effects nor confers a sacrament, let him be anathema.

Canon 13. If anyone says that the received and approved rites of the Catholic Church, accustomed to be used in the administration of the sacraments, may be despised or omitted by the ministers without sin and at their pleasure, or may be changed by any pastor of the churches to other new ones, let him be anathema.​
 
Last edited:

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,206
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Here is how The Catechism of the Council of Trent (published 1566 AD) defines the sacraments.

Definition of a Sacrament

Besides the meaning of the word, which has hitherto engaged our attention, the nature and efficacy of the thing which the word signifies must be diligently considered, and the faithful must be taught what constitutes a Sacrament. No one can doubt that the Sacraments are among the means of attaining righteousness and salvation. But of the many definitions, each of them sufficiently appropriate, which may serve to explain the nature of a Sacrament, there is none more comprehensive, none more perspicuous, than the definition given by St. Augustine and adopted by all scholastic writers. A Sacrament, he says, is a sign of a sacred thing; or, as it has been expressed in other words of the same import: A Sacrament is a visible sign of an invisible grace, instituted for our justification.

"A Sacrament is a Sign"

The more fully to develop this definition, the pastor should ex plain it in all its parts. He should first observe that sensible objects are of two sorts: some have been invented precisely to serve as signs; others have been established not for the sake of signifying something else, but for their own sakes alone. To the latter class almost every object in nature may be said to belong; to the former, spoken and written languages, military standards, images, trumpets, signals, and a multiplicity of other things of the same sort. Thus with regard to words; take away their power of expressing ideas, and you seem to take away the only reason for their invention. Such things are, therefore, properly called signs. For, according to St. Augustine, a sign, besides what it presents to the senses, is a medium through which we arrive at the knowledge of something else. From a footstep, for instance, which we see traced on the ground, we instantly infer that some one whose trace appears has passed.

Proof From Reason

A Sacrament, therefore, is clearly to be numbered among those things which have been instituted as signs. It makes known to us by a certain appearance and resemblance that which God, by His invisible power, accomplishes in our souls. Let us illustrate what we have said by an example. Baptism, for instance, which is administered by external ablution, accompanied with certain solemn words, signifies that by the power of the Holy Ghost all stain and defilement of sin is inwardly washed away, and that the soul is enriched and adorned with the admirable gift of heavenly justification; while, at the same time, the bodily washing, as we shall hereafter explain in its proper place, accomplishes in the soul that which it signifies.

Proof From Scripture

That a Sacrament is to be numbered among signs is dearly inferred also from Scripture. Speaking of circumcision, a Sacrament of the Old Law which was given to Abraham, the father of all believers," the Apostle in his Epistle to the Romans, says: And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the justice of the faith. In another place he says: All we who are baptised in Christ Jesus, are baptised in his death, words which justify the inference that Baptism signifies, to use the words of the same Apostle, that we are buried together with him by baptism into death.

Nor is it unimportant that the faithful should know that the Sacraments are signs. This knowledge will lead them more readily to believe that what the Sacraments signify, contain and effect is holy and august; and recognising their sanctity they will be more disposed to venerate and adore the beneficence of God displayed towards us.

"Sign of a Sacred Thing" : Kind of Sign Meant Here

We now come to explain the words, sacred thing, which constitute the second part of the definition. To render this explanation satisfactory we must enter somewhat more minutely into the accurate and acute remarks of St. Augustine on the variety of signs.

Natural Signs

Some signs are called natural. These, besides making themselves known to us, also convey a knowledge of something else, an effect, as we have already said, common to all signs. Smoke, for instance, is a natural sign from which we immediately infer the existence of fire. It is called a natural sign, because it implies the existence of fire, not by arbitrary institution, but from experience. If we see smoke, we are at once convinced of the presence of fire, even though it is hidden.

Signs Invented By Man,

Other signs are not natural, but conventional, and are invented by men to enable them to converse one with another, to convey their thoughts to others, and in turn to learn the opinions and receive the advice of other men. The variety and multiplicity of such signs may be inferred from the fact that some belong to the eyes, many to the ears, and the rest to the other senses. Thus when we intimate any thing to another by such a sensible sign as the raising of a flag, it is obvious that such intimation is conveyed only through the medium of the eyes; and it is equally obvious that the sound of the trumpet, of the lute and of the lyre - instruments which are not only sources of pleasure, but frequently signs of ideas - is addressed to the ear. Through the latter sense especially are also conveyed words, which are the best medium of communicating our inmost thoughts.

Signs Instituted By God

Besides the signs instituted by the will and agreement of men, of which we have been speaking so far, there are certain other signs appointed by God. These latter, as all admit, are not all of the same kind. Some were instituted by God to indicate something or to bring back its recollection. Such were the purifications of the Law, the unleavened bread, and many other things which belonged to the ceremonies of the Mosaic worship. But God has appointed other signs with power not only to signify, but also to accomplish (what they signify).

Among these are manifestly to be numbered the Sacraments of the New Law. They are signs instituted not by man but by God, which we firmly believe have in themselves the power of producing the sacred effects of which they are the signs.

Kind of Sacred Thing Meant Here

We have seen that there are many kinds of signs. The sacred thing referred to is also of more than one kind. As regards the definition already given of a Sacrament, theologians prove that by the words sacred thing is to be understood the grace of God, which sanctifies the soul and adorns it with the habit of all the divine virtues; and of this grace they rightly consider the words sacred thing, an appropriate appellation, because by its salutary influence the soul is consecrated and united to God.

In order, therefore, to explain more fully the nature of a Sacrament, it should be taught that it is a sensible object which possesses, by divine institution, the power not only of signifying, but also of accomplishing holiness and righteousness. Hence it follows, as everyone can easily see, that the images of the Saints, crosses and the like, although signs of sacred things, cannot be called Sacraments. That such is the nature of a Sacrament is easily proved by the example of all the Sacraments, if we apply to the others what has been already said of Baptism; namely, that the solemn ablution of the body not only signifies, but has power to effect a sacred thing which is wrought interiorly by the operation of the Holy Ghost.

Other Sacred Things Signified By The Sacraments

Now it is especially appropriate that these mystical signs, instituted by God, should signify by the appointment of the Lord not only one thing, but several things at once.

All The Sacraments Signify Something Present, Something Past, Something Future:

This applies to all the Sacraments; for all of them declare not only our sanctity and justification, but also two other things most intimately connected with sanctification, namely, the Passion of Christ our Redeemer, which is the source of our sanctification, and also eternal life and heavenly bliss, which are the end of sanctification. Such, then, being the nature of all the Sacraments, holy Doctors justly hold that each of them has a threefold significance: they remind us of something past; they indicate and point out something present; they foretell something future.

Nor should it be supposed that this teaching of the Doctors is unsupported by the testimony of Holy Scripture. When the Apostle says: All we who are baptised in Christ Jesus, are baptised in his death, he gives us clearly to understand that Baptism is called a sign, because it reminds us of the death and Passion of our Lord. When he says, We are buried together with him by baptism into death; that as Christ is risen from the dead by the glory of the Father, so, we also may walk in newness of life, he also clearly shows that Baptism is a sign which indicates the infusion of divine grace into our souls, which enables us to lead a new life and to perform all the duties of true piety with ease and cheerfulness. Finally, when he adds: If we have been planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection, he teaches that Baptism clearly foreshadows eternal life also, which we are to reach through its efficacy.

A Sacrament Sometimes Signifies The Presence Of More Than One Thing

Besides the different significations already mentioned, a Sacrament also not infrequently indicates and marks the presence of more than one thing. This we readily perceive when we reflect that the Holy Eucharist at once signifies the presence of the real body and blood of Christ and the grace which it imparts to the worthy receiver of the sacred mysteries.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom