Youtube censorship

[Stravinsk]

Has gotten out of control. One of my videos exposing aspects of Charlottesville hoax got removed and many others at the time. A channel I'm subscribed to had a video up for a short few days exposing already public footage hosted on corporate/commercial news(Florida Valentines day shooting), by simply highlighting some things that were said, now the video is gone.

Since youtube was bought, it has become more and more censored and top results for certain types of searches really reveal the Corporate Beast influence exercising it's muscle in certain areas. This in addition to many videos being removed on dubious reasons.

The following, for example is unlikely to stay up on any channel on youtube should it be uploaded there:

https://www.bit-chute.com/video/bSDTKCtohodl/ <----the name of this site doesn't include the hyphen (-) I put in there, because CH's current language filter won't let it post. So if you want to watch the video, simply remove the hyphen between "bit" and "chute" in the link, then copy and post it in a browser.

Since coming under the Corporate Wing, youtube is just likely to continue it's downward spiral of censorship and bias in favorite of already corporate (msm) media.

 

[Lamb]

YouTube doesn't believe in freedom of speech I guess? I know that there were some big videos pulled from the Florida shooting because they claimed that David Hogg was not a student there even though there is evidence that he was (a play he was in the year before).

 

[Andrew]

I don't know what to tell you, someone may have reported it for whatever reason and you would have to fight with them and it would get you no where, just re upload them.
Alan Horvath always gets his videos taken down and so he has a backup at watchalan.com i think.
They attack truthers for sure, I consider Jesus to be the first thruther who taught us to expose evil (yet he IS the truth), the devil tries to censor the truth.



Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk

 

[Andrew]

About the video.
News is literally rumors to me now, I am always working and so I get the news via my dad. That being said, the video makes no sense to me because I haven't seen any footage of the event that happened... its only a rumour to me lol... crazy perspective I have but it seems that the video implies rehearsals that I have seen in the Sandy Hook videos which convinced me that it was a hoax. 911 was rehearsed or fed through by unseen mouths butkeep in mind that whether it be a truth or a lie... "Live" stream is censored for better or worse period.
Again this is not live, which raises suspicion

Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk

 

[Virgil the Socialist]

I know the allure on conspiracy theories. I know what it's like to believe whole heartedly in them. The process of figuring out they are usually BS is not easy. Conspiratorial thinking is the epitome of irrational, non-falsifiable groupthink. It's a disease of the information age. No respectable organization should have to be party to disseminating this kind of destructive drivel. In terms of free speech, absurdities like this are akin to what Justice Holmes said in Schenck v. US, "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

[tango]

I know the allure on conspiracy theories. I know what it's like to believe whole heartedly in them. The process of figuring out they are usually BS is not easy. Conspiratorial thinking is the epitome of irrational, non-falsifiable groupthink. It's a disease of the information age. No respectable organization should have to be party to disseminating this kind of destructive drivel. In terms of free speech, absurdities like this are akin to what Justice Holmes said in Schenck v. US, "The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic."

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

... except you'd probably struggle to objective define the distinction between a conspiracy theory that is demonstrably destructive, and a version of events that differs fundamentally from the official version of events but subsequently turns out to be wholly or partially true.

Just look at the differing versions of events surrounding the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes on the London Underground back in 2005. It's easy to see why the police would take immediate action, two weeks after bombs were detonated on the London Underground, when faced with a man wearing a vest in July (i.e. it's by no means a cold day), with wires protruding from under the vest, who responded to instructions to stop by vaulting the ticket barrier and running.

Except it turned out there were no wires, the guy was Brazilian and therefore more likely to want a warming vest than the average Londoner, it was far from clear whether he vaulted the barriers at all, doubt was cast on whether he even knew the people shouting at him were police officers, and so on. Sadly he did not survive his encounter with the police so was unable to offer his version of events.

 

[Virgil the Socialist]

... except you'd probably struggle to objective define the distinction between a conspiracy theory that is demonstrably destructive, and a version of events that differs fundamentally from the official version of events but subsequently turns out to be wholly or partially true.

Just look at the differing versions of events surrounding the shooting of Jean Charles de Menezes on the London Underground back in 2005. It's easy to see why the police would take immediate action, two weeks after bombs were detonated on the London Underground, when faced with a man wearing a vest in July (i.e. it's by no means a cold day), with wires protruding from under the vest, who responded to instructions to stop by vaulting the ticket barrier and running.

Except it turned out there were no wires, the guy was Brazilian and therefore more likely to want a warming vest than the average Londoner, it was far from clear whether he vaulted the barriers at all, doubt was cast on whether he even knew the people shouting at him were police officers, and so on. Sadly he did not survive his encounter with the police so was unable to offer his version of events.

Well almost by definition a conspiracy theory doesn't have complete factual support. Gaps in what is known are filled in with innuendo and theorized assumptions. An organization with any public platform of media distribution may reasonably come up with a standard to evaluate figures accused of innuendo-driven sensationalism.

Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk

 

[Andrew]

Technically 911 is a conspiracy theory in the official version

Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk

 

[Albion]

What would make the standard explanation, backed with the evidence, a mere theory?

I know that there are people who deny 911 was caused by airplanes, but then what were the planes for?...and there are the inevitable "The USA did it" types, but the evidence for that seems lacking, so all of THAT stuff looks like a Conspiracy Theory all right.

 

[Stravinsk]

YouTube doesn't believe in freedom of speech I guess? I know that there were some big videos pulled from the Florida shooting because they claimed that David Hogg was not a student there even though there is evidence that he was (a play he was in the year before).

Regarding the latter part (Hogg not being a student) it's simple bait and switch, probably the same with the yearbook claims. The media can have fun with it because they are fairly easy to prove/disprove.

Statement 1: David Hogg is a crisis actor
Statement 2: Statement 1 is correct because X where X is easily shown to be in error.

Therefore, David Hogg is true blue. See you silly conspiracy theorists!

It's an effort to divert attention away from obvious clues in various public videos. I spent some time on one going through it point by point, on statements and on indications also of it being done in front of a green screen. Things that might not be obvious to someone lulled by the hypnotic flicker and suggestibility of commercial television. I might still put a video together, but it's pointless to upload it to Youtube at this point, as their vague rules, the application of those rules and the pressure put on them to bend to MSM to conform is quite obvious.

 

[Stravinsk]

What would make the standard explanation, backed with the evidence, a mere theory?

I know that there are people who deny 911 was caused by airplanes, but then what were the planes for?...and there are the inevitable "The USA did it" types, but the evidence for that seems lacking, so all of THAT stuff looks like a Conspiracy Theory all right.

I think what DHoffman is referring to is the conspiracy presented to us by the US government in the official version. A conspiracy that alleges some arabs with box cutters led/influenced by OBL took over multiple aircraft and slammed them into buildings, because they "hate our freedoms".

 

[Andrew]

I think what DHoffman is referring to is the conspiracy presented to us by the US government in the official version. A conspiracy that alleges some arabs with box cutters led/influenced by OBL took over multiple aircraft and slammed them into buildings, because they "hate our freedoms".

Right that is what I was referring too.
People assume too that we went to war for vengeance and what better way to get people involved in a war other than that old fashion draft! But no, we went there for the weapons of mass destruction. Got some oil out of it, oh btw Stravinsk did we ever find the weapons of mass destruction?

Here is the official theory according to the government in under 5 minutes
https://youtu.be/l47D5ISemds

Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk

 

[Stravinsk]

Hmm. Well it seems youtube is slowing down on their censorship of this event, or the computer algorithms aren't catching everything.

LOL.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYVZAJSuuiM

 

[Andrew]

Hmm. Well it seems youtube is slowing down on their censorship of this event, or the computer algorithms aren't catching everything.

LOL.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TYVZAJSuuiM

Ok so here is what I think happened.

He gets the news that 4 of his sisters best friends died.

He then gets the news that 2 came back to life

..and then got the news that one of those two died (again)

...and then he gets the news that another one or perhaps even that same one that recently died came back to life (again?)

...and then he gets the news that another person came back to life once again..

This is logic we are using now, not sure if the video clips are chronologically presented lol but hey news is news right? Like stirring up an ant pile, thats why I longer watch the news, that and because im always working, but all news does is stir people up whether they accept it or accept that its a hoax... its as dangerous as common gossip and makes the other half a bit apathetic to the situation, like a lose lose situation. It's important that we not lose our focus and attention on the word at these moments.
"For you will hear of wars and rumors of wars... "
it stinks both ways IMO you will either accept it or accept a conspiracy either way the devil is conspiring to confuse us all. Spoiler alert, he loses

...

Sent from my LGLS755 using Tapatalk

 

[Stravinsk]

Like stirring up an ant pile, thats why I longer watch the news, that and because im always working, but all news does is stir people up whether they accept it or accept that its a hoax... its as dangerous as common gossip and makes the other half a bit apathetic to the situation, like a lose lose situation.

I don't watch corporate news because most of it is garbage by corporations who are mandated by law to look after their bottom line first, and answer to their stockholders, creditors and advertisers to keep that bottom line in the black.

Corporate news is manufactured news. One generally does not get truth from it. If there is truth, it is tainted by lies and bias and agendas of those in control of the corporations.

The truth comes out, often by brave individuals acting on their own. For example, we didn't learn of the truth of what was going on in Vietnam or the real motivations for it from corporations, but from brave individuals willing to take a risk to get it to the public. That's generally how it works in all events involving public policy. Unfortunately, as is too often the case, the truth comes out later, after the blood has been spilled and lives lost and people suffering and policies in place and to those who benefited financially who have already been paid - then it doesn't matter all that much. Wait and see - they'll fool the masses again some other way.

 

[Stravinsk]

Natural News is now gone from Youtube, axed just earlier this month.

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-03...t-politically-motivated-censorship-purge.html

YouTube is Corporate Censorship Tube, beholden to it's corporate masters and the banks that hold the controlling amount of shares in those corporations and anything that rocks their bottom lines or their agendas is now up for deletion and censorship.