non-sin
Is that to excuse the watching of those that are deliberately malintentioned and either subtly or openly normalize the acceptance of the listed abominations to God in the Bible so the we accept them and indirectly participate in them by doing so? Those that teach the practice of these things on an unconscious mechanism of our mind that is activated through video presentations?Sin is everywhere. Even the most well-intentioned tv shows will have some sort of sin by addition or omission.
Watching Church sermons on TV in pursuit of a Godly life would certainly not be a sin, but how about watching shows that portray sin -everything from magic and witchcraft to sexual deviance- as good, acceptable and even desirable?Watching TV is not a sin. TV shows could lead people into sin, and be stumbling blocks and/or give someone false perspectives.
Watching Church sermons on TV in pursuit of a Godly life would certainly not be a sin, but how about watching shows that portray sin -everything from magic and witchcraft to sexual deviance- as good, acceptable and even desirable?
Would you consider watching things like men kissing men, women kissing women, and bedroom scenes of them doing this to be a sin or not, and why? would you consider watching shows based on portrayals of casual sexual relations between unmarried men and women to be sinful or not? And further, would you find it acceptable to support those producing such things financially to be sinful or OK in the sight of God?
This is how the Devil (the one behind it IMO) unconsciously preconditions us to accept wrong as right, evil as good, so that we embrace it when we encounter it (and that is scientifically supportable if you want to pursue the unconscious preconditioning mechanism of it, not just a supposition).
When we say watching TV isn't a sin we should not be considering the watching of it but the nature of what we watch and financially support as being or not being a sinful activity.
The Title of the Thread is "What "Allowed Tv." Allowed. Are you under the law?
It seemed good to the Holy Spirit and to us not to burden you with anything beyond the following requirements: 29 You are to abstain from food sacrificed to idols, from blood, from the meat of strangled animals and from sexual immorality. You will do well to avoid these things. (Acts 15:28,29)
Watching Church sermons on TV in pursuit of a Godly life would certainly not be a sin, but how about watching shows that portray sin -everything from magic and witchcraft to sexual deviance- as good, acceptable and even desirable?
Would you consider watching things like men kissing men, women kissing women, and bedroom scenes of them doing this to be a sin or not, and why? would you consider watching shows based on portrayals of casual sexual relations between unmarried men and women to be sinful or not? And further, would you find it acceptable to support those producing such things financially to be sinful or OK in the sight of God?
This is how the Devil (the one behind it IMO) unconsciously preconditions us to accept wrong as right, evil as good, so that we embrace it when we encounter it (and that is scientifically supportable if you want to pursue the unconscious preconditioning mechanism of it, not just a supposition).
When we say watching TV isn't a sin we should not be considering the watching of it but the nature of what we watch and financially support as being or not being a sinful activity.
It's easy to draw a line and say that it's good to watch a sermon presenting God's word rightly divided. In between is a world of gray.
So what is the Biblical reference you use to establish that 'shade of gray' thing and what did Jesus teach about it?
Personally, I've never found anything Jesus said -or that the Bible says- to be ambiguous and subject to interpretation according to what your desire for it to mean is at the time you desire it.
But I'm willing to learn and change, at least if you can show me something solid to base a change in thinking on that is in accord with the teaching of Jesus.
Christianity is standards based. Someone is fail or pass. They are a no-go or a go. They are In darkness of The Light of The Lord. (Ephesians 5:8) There is nothing wrong with seeking. Many people should be seeking. Given someone wasn't there, they dust themselves off and try again. There are no shades of grey. It is back and white.
In the OP, was someone in sin, looking to apply the standard in sin? That would be wrong.
Perhaps you would gain more by being introspective than defensive.Did I say anything about our desires? You're throwing up strawmen.
Try what Paul said about meat offered to idols, or what James said about knowing what we should do and not doing it.
Alternatively feel free to quote chapter and verse for every one of the assertions you're making.
I absolutely agree with you on this even though there was a time when I was younger that I would have argued against it.Christianity is standards based. Someone is fail or pass. They are a no-go or a go. They are In darkness of The Light of The Lord. (Ephesians 5:8) There is nothing wrong with seeking. Many people should be seeking. Given someone wasn't there, they dust themselves off and try again. There are no shades of grey. It is back and white.
In the OP, was someone in sin, looking to apply the standard in sin? That would be wrong.