Site Rule Addition - Please read

[Lamb]

We have added the following addition to our site rules:

Rejection of any of the 66 traditional books of the Holy Bible will give cause to have that member placed in the Unorthodox usergroup, and the member will not be able to post in the Christian only sections of this site. This includes anti-Pauline theology.

We encourage our members to fully embrace the word of God so that they may grow in faith.

 

[JustTheFacts]

We have added the following addition to our site rules:

Rejection of any of the 66 traditional books of the Holy Bible will give cause to have that member placed in the Unorthodox usergroup, and the member will not be able to post in the Christian only sections of this site. This includes anti-Pauline theology.

We encourage our members to fully embrace the word of God so that they may grow in faith.

So the Christian Theology section is limited to only those whose theology matches the prescribed theology? In other words a Christian who doesn‘t agree with the prescribed theology can not have a theological exchange with other Christians?

 

[Lamb]

So the Christian Theology section is limited to only those whose theology matches the prescribed theology? In other words a Christian who doesn‘t agree with the prescribed theology can not have a theological exchange with other Christians?

The Christian theology forum is not for people who try to turn Christians away from any parts of Holy Scripture (there are 66 books total, and some denominations believe in other apocryphal books, but for our purposes we state the traditional 66).

 

[JustTheFacts]

The Christian theology forum is not for people who try to turn Christians away from any parts of Holy Scripture (there are 66 books total, and some denominations believe in other apocryphal books, but for our purposes we state the traditional 66).

I haven’t been turning anybody away from those books. My results show they are not the word of God, but if Im wrong, I want to know. I asked for proof and so did you and we both have received nothing in response. With no proof that the words of Paul are the word of God, they are theology and not the word of God. It’s a valid question for believers, but one that Christians want to ignore—example, me being evicted for simply asking the question.

 

[Lamb]

I haven’t been turning anybody away from those books. My results show they are not the word of God, but if Im wrong, I want to know. I asked for proof and so did you and we both have received nothing in response. With no proof that the words of Paul are the word of God, they are theology and not the word of God. It’s a valid question for believers, but one that Christians want to ignore—example, me being evicted for simply asking the question.

Members have told you about the canon process for those books and you still reject that. I'm closing this thread as this is not going to be up for debate.