Since there’s evidence that 1 Maccabees was probably written in Hebrew originally…

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Then we should avoid the terms “verbatim” and “word for word” wherever they are inappropriate, and stick to making TRUE statements about scripture.

Not all Gospel accounts of the words of Jesus are “verbatim”.
True, but the closest to the letter is typically from the Greek Hebrew source, it's actually the recieved OT source for Jesus and the Apostles. I'm telling you, Rabbanic Judaism altered the prophecies, it's obviously when you compare scripture.
lxx_vs_mt3.jpg
 

atpollard

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
2,573
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
True, but the closest to the letter is typically from the Greek Hebrew source, it's actually the recieved OT source for Jesus and the Apostles. I'm telling you, Rabbanic Judaism altered the prophecies, it's obviously when you compare scripture.
View attachment 1844
Are you really striving to demonstrate that the Greek in the NT is closer to being word for word to the Greek OT than to the Hebrew OT?

Isn’t that to be expected since both are in “Greek”. I bet comparing the KJV with the ESV will show them to be closer to “word for word” than comparing them to a Spanish translation like the RVR60.

Just for the sake of argument, if we assume that the LXX OT is closer to the NT quotation than the MT OT … then my question is: So what?

  • How does this information help me to know Christ as Lord and savior?
  • What does this have to do with Maccabees?
 
Top Bottom