Imalive
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2017
- Messages
- 2,315
- Gender
- Female
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
Welcome to Christianity Haven, thank you for visiting! If you have not already, we invite you to create an account and join in on the many discussions we have!
I wonder if.... years from now..... our society will look back at this aspect of our nation today.... in much the same way as we look back at the Salem witch thing.... American culture then viewed witches even more seriously than we do sexual inappropriateness, and it was the same "guilty/condemned if accused" and "guilty unless you can prove yourself innocent which isn't permitted" mentality. The same silence for years and then, suddenly, out of the blue, here flood all the accusers with NOTHING but their accusation. The difference is we don't crush the victims to death... but their lives are ruined.
We need to find a way to address this with equal fairness to both sides. I don't have the answer with how to handle this. Obviously sexual sin is a problem and its very nature is that it tends to be private. And it certainly has a huge psychological component that can make this difficult. I'm not diminishing any of that. On the other hand, we KNOW that memories can be very flawed..... the Rule of Law holds that the accused is 100% innocent until PROVEN guilty..... and in all other things, there is a statue of limitations. We need to fine some way to address this with equal fairness to both sides (and I admit, I don't know how that would be done). What we have now are witch trials - worse than Salem in that often there is no trial at all, the accused is just condemned by society. MORALLY (since this thread has stressed that point), we are called to defend justice - not burn any accused of something.
The other point that is entirely lost in this situation. What is and is not acceptable in this area is CULTURAL. And it's WRONG to impose a different culture/time/morale upon a different one. In 1979 in Alabama, the LEGAL age of marriage without parental consent for girls was 14, and so what was culturally acceptable in dating was acceptable at that age. It was not at all unusual for men in the 30's to date girls in their teens, even younger teens. Men kissing girls and teens (on the mouth) was fully acceptable (I'm told by a co-worker who grew up in Georgia). That's NOT the culture now..... but it was then.
I know that there are women who would do this and others that would pile on and in the meantime they are guilty even if they artent. I think that eventually some will get caught up in their lies and then maybe there will not be such a rush to judgement, Ipray so anyway. It is rediculous men are all of a sudden modern day lepers
ROFL:lol:We should get those warning bells again and yell: unclean! unclean! if one approaches.
It seems to me the "let's be fair" argument has gone ENTIRELY, EXCLUSIVELY to one side (no matter what) and we've thrown out the Rule of Law in the process, creating a "witch hunt" mentality.
And it often seems VERY political. How many dozen women accused Bill Clinton of this? All we heard is, "but that was YEARS ago" and "but there's no evidence!" There was at least one case where I think 99.9% of even the liberals concluded he was guilty but no one cared, didn't matter, boys will be boys.... Ah the hypocrisy of it all (often, not always).....
I DO think we need to find some balance here..... we need to end the Salem Witch approach... but we can't go to the radical other end and just categorically dismiss accusations, either. How to do that - with justice for all, under the Rule of Law where the accused is innocent until proven guilty.... I don't know.