- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 14,695
- Location
- Realms of chaos
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
I've had a few discussions with people about theology and whether particular things are good or bad.
One point that seems to come up depressingly frequently is a question about whether I think their heart is in the right place. It seems to be a classic avoidance mechanism because it challenges the questioner to either condemn the person for deliberately misguiding people, or back away from their questioning. But there's a third option that seems to get overlooked.
Someone can be very passionate in what they believe, their heart can be 100% true to their beliefs and they can have the best of intentions and still be wrong. Jesus said "no-one comes to the Father except through me", so if he was right then Vishnu is not the way to God regardless of how passionately Hindus may believe; Krishna cannot save however fervently the men in orange suits pray to him, and so on.
I've seen one particular web site describe how a prophecy can be tested by whether reading or hearing it gives a burning sensation in the chest. Apparently if it does then that's all the proof you need that the prophecy is sound and came from God. Which is curious, because for me personally that kind of sensation often seems to serve as an early warning that something isn't right (I don't reject something purely based on such a feeling but it does prompt me to test more carefully).
So what do we do when faced with two people who disagree on whether something is sound - one says it feels right and the other says it feels wrong? Well, the obvious thing to do is to go back to the objective truth of Scripture. That means one of them might have to accept they were wrong, but unless we are willing to take things to test them against the eternal truth of Scripture we might as well be a buyer and seller at a market stall arguing over whether the bag of sugar really weighs a pound or not - the buyer insisting it's light and the seller insisting it's correct - but unwilling to put it on a scale to settle the matter.
Sadly good intentions only go so far and can still be very damaging. To quote an unnamed wise saying I read many years ago, "think how well-intentioned the monkey is as he lifts a fish from the river, to save it from a watery grave"
One point that seems to come up depressingly frequently is a question about whether I think their heart is in the right place. It seems to be a classic avoidance mechanism because it challenges the questioner to either condemn the person for deliberately misguiding people, or back away from their questioning. But there's a third option that seems to get overlooked.
Someone can be very passionate in what they believe, their heart can be 100% true to their beliefs and they can have the best of intentions and still be wrong. Jesus said "no-one comes to the Father except through me", so if he was right then Vishnu is not the way to God regardless of how passionately Hindus may believe; Krishna cannot save however fervently the men in orange suits pray to him, and so on.
I've seen one particular web site describe how a prophecy can be tested by whether reading or hearing it gives a burning sensation in the chest. Apparently if it does then that's all the proof you need that the prophecy is sound and came from God. Which is curious, because for me personally that kind of sensation often seems to serve as an early warning that something isn't right (I don't reject something purely based on such a feeling but it does prompt me to test more carefully).
So what do we do when faced with two people who disagree on whether something is sound - one says it feels right and the other says it feels wrong? Well, the obvious thing to do is to go back to the objective truth of Scripture. That means one of them might have to accept they were wrong, but unless we are willing to take things to test them against the eternal truth of Scripture we might as well be a buyer and seller at a market stall arguing over whether the bag of sugar really weighs a pound or not - the buyer insisting it's light and the seller insisting it's correct - but unwilling to put it on a scale to settle the matter.
Sadly good intentions only go so far and can still be very damaging. To quote an unnamed wise saying I read many years ago, "think how well-intentioned the monkey is as he lifts a fish from the river, to save it from a watery grave"