Matt 27:50-53

[Odë:hgöd]

.
• Matt 27:50-53 . . And when Jesus had cried out again in a loud voice, he gave up
his spirit.

. . . At that moment the curtain of the temple was torn in two from top to bottom.
The earth shook and the rocks split. The tombs broke open and the bodies of many
holy people who had died were raised to life. They came out of the tombs, and after
Jesus' resurrection they went into the holy city and appeared to many people.

When those people went into town, they likely went directly home to their families
and/or their kin; which would've been folks who attended their funerals so there
would be no mistaking they were back from the dead.

It would've helped the credibility of Jesus' resurrection quite a bit had he gone into
Jerusalem after his resurrection and shown himself alive to Pontius Pilate and the
Jews' religious authorities instead of keeping his recovery private.

It's curious why Jesus didn't stage a public appearance after his crucified dead body
was successfully restored to life. Why only his followers? Why not to all the Jews?
_

 

[Albion]

.
• Matt 27:50-53 . . .
It would've helped the credibility of Jesus' resurrection quite a bit had he gone into
Jerusalem after his resurrection and shown himself alive to Pontius Pilate and the
Jews' religious authorities instead of keeping his recovery private.

It's curious why Jesus didn't stage a public appearance after his crucified dead body
was successfully restored to life. Why only his followers? Why not to all the Jews?
_

The Bible states that he was seen by over five hundred people (!) on one occasion between his Resurrection and the Ascension, and we know that he was also seen by others during those weeks.

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
• Mark 16:9 . . Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he
appeared first to Mary Magdalene.

• 1Cor 15:5-8 . . He appeared to Peter, and then to the twelve. After that, he
appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of
whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James,
then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one
abnormally born.

Why didn't Jesus show himself alive to all the Jews instead of only his followers?
_

 

[Lees]

.
• Mark 16:9 . . Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he
appeared first to Mary Magdalene.

• 1Cor 15:5-8 . . He appeared to Peter, and then to the twelve. After that, he
appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of
whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James,
then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one
abnormally born.

Why didn't Jesus show himself alive to all the Jews instead of only his followers?
_

Because He didn't want to show Himself to all the Jews.

Do you have a problem with why Jesus did what He did? If so...you have a real problem.

Lees

 

[Albion]

.
• Mark 16:9 . . Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he
appeared first to Mary Magdalene.

• 1Cor 15:5-8 . . He appeared to Peter, and then to the twelve. After that, he
appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of
whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James,
then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one
abnormally born.

Why didn't Jesus show himself alive to all the Jews instead of only his followers?
_

"All the Jews?" What is so critical about doing that, and what is left undone by him showing himself to (only) hundreds of believers and non-believers over the course of a few weeks?

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.

and what is left undone by him showing himself to (only) hundreds of believers and
non-believers

According to 1Cor 15:5-8 Jesus showed himself alive only to the apostles and to
"the brothers" i.e. the brethren; which always identifies believers rather than non
believers. The only non-believer listed is Paul.

What is so critical about doing that

Well; I don't know about the critical angle, but it sure is intriguing. There just has
to be a theological reason behind Jesus not going into Jerusalem to show himself
alive; at the very least to Pilate and the religious authorities.
_

 

[Albion]

.
According to 1Cor 15:5-8 Jesus showed himself alive only to the apostles and to
"the brothers" i.e. the brethren; which always identifies believers rather than non
believers. The only non-believer listed is Paul.

However, there are other verses that bear upon the subject.

Well, I don't know about the critical angle, but it sure is intriguing. There just has
to be a theological reason behind Jesus not going into Jerusalem to show himself
alive; at the very least to Pilate and the religious authorities.
_

I guess I don't see that need. We might, by the same token, ask why every resident of Bethlehem wasn't ushered to the stable to see the newborn king on the occasion of his birth. Or wonder why Jesus didn't cure more people than he did, or why he didn't preach the Sermon on the Mount to other audiences. We can wonder, all right, but there is no real reason for him to have done anything other than what he did.

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.

there is no real reason for him to have done anything other than what he did.

.Jesus' itinerary was micro-managed viz: he didn't come into the world as an
independent agent, instead; he came as a servant.

• Phil 2:7-8 . . He made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the form of a
servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in fashion as a
man, he humbled himself, and became obedient

• John 4:34 . . My food, said Jesus, is to do the will of him who sent me

• John 6:38 . . I have come down from heaven, not to do my own will, but the will
of Him who sent me.

• John 8:28 . . I do nothing on my own initiative

• John 8:29 . . He that sent me is with me: the Father hath not left me alone; for I
do always those things that please Him.

• John 14:31 . . I do exactly what my Father has commanded me.

So then, the decision not to show himself alive in Jerusalem wasn't Jesus' decision
to make. And as I assume that everything God directed His son to do was
appropriate, intelligent, and wise, then I believe there is a valid theological reason
why Jesus avoided Jerusalem after his crucified dead body was restored to life.

I think I've figured out what that reason is but I'm not ready to share my thoughts
just yet.
_

 

[Albion]

So then, the decision not to show himself alive in Jerusalem wasn't Jesus' decision
to make. And as I assume that everything God directed His son to do, was done
according to intelligence and good judgment, then I believe there is a valid
theological reason why Jesus was a no-show in Jerusalem after his crucified dead
body was restored to life.

It's right to say that Jesus was not making these choices willy-nilly, so I hope that means we can put that issue aside, but as for the rest of your post, I have to disagree with the notion that he was any kind of "no show" when Scripture testifies that he appeared to more than 500 people prior to the Ascension.

And then there was my earlier mention of the fact that while some of these were his disciples, although we aren't told how many, it's almost certain that quite a few others were not his followers since it is estimated that, at that time, his followers in the entirety of the Holy Land numbered only in the hundreds.

 

[Odë:hgöd]

.
• Matt 23:37-39 . . O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and
stones God's messengers! How often I have wanted to gather your children
together as a hen protects her chicks beneath her wings, but you wouldn't let me.
And now look, your house is left to you empty and desolate. For I tell you this, you
will never see me again until you say; "Blessed is the one who comes in the name
of The Lord!"

That passage is loaded with goodies; and I'm pretty sure it's best to regard it as not
just Jesus speaking for himself, rather, speaking for God.

• John 3:34-35 . .He is sent by God. He speaks God's words, for God's spirit is upon
him without measure or limit.

• John 8:26 . .He that sent me is true; and I speak to the world those things which
I have heard of Him.

• John 12:49 . . I have not spoken of myself; but the Father which sent me, He
gave me a commandment, what I should say, and what I should speak.

• John 14:24 . .The word which you hear is not mine, but the Father's who sent
me.

• Heb 1:1-2 . . In the past God spoke to our forefathers through the prophets at
many times and in various ways, but in these last days He has spoken to us by His
son

So; the first half of Jesus' lament speaks of Old Testament events; the middle
speaks of the Temple, and the last part speaks of Christ's return when the whole
city inside will welcome him instead of only the folks who welcomed him outside the
city per Matt 21:1-10

In a nutshell; Matt 23:37-39 says God would've liked for Jesus to stay and set up
the Messianic kingdom, viz: Jerusalem's association with Him back then, prior to
Jesus' crucifixion and resurrection, had the potential to become permanent, but
instead was cut short. The way Jerusalem went about eliminating Jesus was not
only the last straw, but also the last that city would see of him for quite a while.

• Hos 3:4-5 . . For the Israelites will live many days without king or prince, without
sacrifice or sacred stones, without ephod or idol. Afterward the Israelites will return
and seek The Lord their God and David their king. They will come trembling to The
Lord and to His blessings in the last days.
_