As for the derailing attempt....
The pitch of "I myself alone can't be wrong so I can't be wrong when I claim that I can't be wrong means I can't be wrong" is, undeniably, just a pure circular argument: it is nothing other than an egotistical, power-grabbing, accountability-evading claim of self for self. It don't get no more circular.
Now, it IS true that medieval Catholicism dogmatized that "lord-it-over-others" claim in its struggle first with the Eastern Church (the final split coming in 1054) and with secular governments - all in a struggle for power and lordship. And it was still a often used circular argument in the Reformation. And it's still in the Catechism (see CCC 87 for example). But (as a former Catholic I can tell you), it's been a long time since Catholics have use that outside of itself - it IS a PURE, extreme circular argument (and Catholic apologists took logic in college, LOL they KNOW that).
What our Catholic brother (and he IS my full, unseparated, equal brother with whom I'll be spending eternity in heaven... he IS a full member of the Body of Christ and the one, holy, catholic church) what he is doing is, well, silly and self-defeating. He is 1) Using a Protestant principle Catholicism rejects (Sola Scriptura) to try to show Protestants that the egotistical, power-grabbing medieval claims of the CC for itself is stated in the Bible then PROVES it's not. All he is doing is PROVING to Protestants that the claim is not only radically circular and an egotistical power grab and evasion of accountabilty but NOT shown in Scripture and 2) Showing he doesn't want to discuss the topic here (or any other - in all threads, it's this "let me know you how the Bible states nothing that I do" rubric. The whole point of the circular claim is to avoid apologetics, avoid accountability. "Just docilicly swallow it whole cuz I'm saying it and I'm saying I can't be wrong when I'm saying so there."
Back to the topic of the thread. See posts 1-3
.