• Welcome to Christianity Haven, thank you for visiting! If you have not already, we invite you to create an account and join in on the many discussions we have! 

    • Please be aware that when registering you must not register while using a VPN. Any registrations made using a VPN will be rejected.
    • Additionally, registration emails are not being sent out which is an issue that is being worked on. Your registration may go into an approval queue for admin approval. We work to send manual emails to the email on file, so please ensure the email you use is one you can readily access! 

In what ways does the Apocrypha point to Jesus as Savior?

jswauto

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2025
Messages
874
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

The Greek Septuagint: Origins, Structure, Influence, and Modern Status

Introduction

The Greek Septuagint (LXX) is one of the most influential texts in the history of Judaism and Christianity. Produced between the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC in Alexandria, it represents the earliest major translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek — the lingua franca of the ancient Mediterranean world. More than a translation, the Septuagint is a window into Second Temple Judaism, a foundational text for early Christianity, and a critical witness for modern biblical scholarship. Its contents, language, translators, and transmission shaped how Scripture was read by Hellenistic Jews, quoted by New Testament authors, and interpreted by early Church Fathers. Today, the Septuagint remains essential for textual criticism, canon studies, and understanding the theological world of Jesus and the apostles.

Overview table

AspectKey Points
Origin & historyBegan in Alexandria, 3rd–2nd c. BC, under Ptolemaic rule
ContentsGreek translation of Hebrew Bible + additional books (Apocrypha/Deuterocanon)
Language & dialectKoine Greek with Semitic influence, varying by book and translator
Translators/authorsMultiple Jewish translators over time, anonymous, working in stages
Historical impactUsed by Hellenistic Jews, New Testament writers, early Church Fathers
VerifiabilitySupported by ancient manuscripts, citations, and textual comparison
Status todayCritical text for OT studies; liturgical Bible in Eastern Orthodoxy

1. History and origin

The Septuagint (often abbreviated LXX) is the earliest substantial translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek. It arose in Alexandria, Egypt, between roughly the 3rd and 2nd centuries BC, in a context where many Jews were Greek‑speaking and no longer fluent in Hebrew. The traditional story in the Letter of Aristeas claims that 72 Jewish scholars translated the Torah for the library of Ptolemy II Philadelphus; while legendary in detail, it reflects a real historical process: the Pentateuch was translated first, then other books followed over the next century or so. The Septuagint was thus born out of diaspora Jewish life, imperial politics, and the need for Scripture in the lingua franca of the eastern Mediterranean.

2. Contents: what’s actually in the Septuagint

The Septuagint is not just a Greek Old Testament identical to the later Hebrew Masoretic Text. Its contents include:
  • Pentateuch: Genesis–Deuteronomy
  • Historical books: Joshua, Judges, Ruth, 1–4 Kingdoms (Samuel–Kings), 1–2 Chronicles, Ezra–Nehemiah, etc.
  • Wisdom and poetry: Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, Wisdom of Solomon, Sirach (Ecclesiasticus)
  • Prophets: Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, the Twelve Minor Prophets
  • Additional books: Tobit, Judith, Baruch, 1–4 Maccabees, additions to Daniel (Susanna, Bel and the Dragon, Prayer of Azariah), additions to Esther, and others depending on manuscript tradition.
These “extra” books are what later Protestants call the Apocrypha and Catholics/Orthodox call the Deuterocanonical books. In antiquity, they circulated alongside the other books in Greek Jewish and Christian communities, and the boundaries of the canon were not yet fixed in the way they later became.

3. Location and transmission: where it lived and how it spread

The Septuagint’s birthplace was Alexandria, but its life extended across the entire Hellenistic world. Greek‑speaking Jews in Egypt, Syria, Asia Minor, and beyond used it in synagogue and study. By the 1st century AD, it was widely available enough that New Testament authors could quote from it naturally. After the rise of Christianity, the Septuagint became the Old Testament of the early Church, copied in major codices like Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus, and Codex Alexandrinus. These manuscripts, preserved in Rome, Sinai, London, and elsewhere, are key witnesses to its text. Over time, Jewish communities moved toward revised Greek versions (Aquila, Theodotion, Symmachus) and eventually toward the Masoretic Hebrew text, while Christians continued to transmit the Septuagint as their primary Old Testament.

4. Language and dialects: how the Septuagint “sounds”

The Septuagint is written in Koine Greek, the common Greek of the Hellenistic and Roman periods. However, its style varies:
  • Pentateuch and historical books: often more literal, with strong Semitic influence, calques, and Hebraisms.
  • Wisdom literature: sometimes more idiomatic Greek, closer to contemporary philosophical and literary style.
  • Later books and additions: can show freer translation, paraphrase, or expansion.
Different translators worked on different books, so you can feel distinct “voices” and translation philosophies. Overall, the Septuagint is a bridge language: Greek vocabulary and syntax carrying Hebrew thought‑forms and theology.

5. Translators and “authors”: who produced it

The Septuagint was produced by Jewish translators, not Christians, and not by a single committee at one time. The Pentateuch likely had a more organized translation project; other books were translated later, perhaps by different groups or individuals. Their names are unknown, and the tradition of “72 translators” is symbolic rather than historical detail. These translators were:
  • Fluent in Hebrew and Greek
  • Embedded in Hellenistic Jewish culture
  • Working with Hebrew source texts that sometimes differ from the later Masoretic tradition
They are not “authors” in the sense of composing new Scripture, but they are interpreters, and their choices sometimes reveal how Second Temple Jews understood the Hebrew text.

6. Historical figures and movements affected by the Septuagint

The Septuagint shaped:
  • New Testament writers: Many OT quotations in the NT follow the Septuagint wording rather than the Masoretic Hebrew. This affects Christology, ecclesiology, and prophecy interpretation.
  • Jesus and the apostles: In Greek‑speaking contexts, Scripture citations would naturally align with the Septuagint.
  • Early Church Fathers: Irenaeus, Athanasius, Origen, Chrysostom, Augustine, and many others relied heavily on the Septuagint as their Old Testament.
  • Jewish–Christian debates: Differences between Septuagint and Hebrew texts became points of controversy, leading to Origen’s Hexapla and later textual work.
  • Canon formation: The presence of Deuterocanonical books in Septuagint manuscripts influenced which books were considered Scripture in various Christian traditions.
In short, the Septuagint is woven into the theological DNA of both Judaism (in its early phases) and Christianity (especially in its formative centuries).

7. Verifiability and textual reliability

The Septuagint’s existence and character are highly verifiable:
  • Manuscripts: Major codices (Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus) and numerous papyri preserve its text.
  • Ancient references: Jewish and Christian writers from the 2nd century BC onward refer to and quote it.
  • Textual comparison: Modern scholars compare Septuagint readings with the Masoretic Text, Dead Sea Scrolls, and other witnesses to reconstruct earlier Hebrew forms and translation practices.
While the Septuagint is not uniform in quality—some books are very literal, others freer—it is a critical textual witness. In some cases, its readings align with Hebrew variants found at Qumran, suggesting it preserves older or alternative Hebrew traditions. In other cases, it reflects interpretive translation. So its reliability is not “perfect,” but it is indispensable for serious Old Testament textual criticism.

 

jswauto

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2025
Messages
874
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

8. Status today: how the Septuagint is viewed and used

Today, the Septuagint holds different statuses in different communities:
  • Eastern Orthodox Church: It is effectively the official Old Testament, used liturgically and doctrinally.
  • Roman Catholic Church: It recognizes the Deuterocanonical books and often considers Septuagint readings in translation and theology, though the Hebrew Masoretic Text is also central.
  • Protestant traditions: Historically prioritized the Masoretic Text, but modern scholarship increasingly values the Septuagint for textual criticism and understanding NT use of the OT.
  • Academic biblical studies: The Septuagint is a primary tool for reconstructing the history of the biblical text, studying Second Temple Judaism, and analyzing how Scripture was understood in the Hellenistic world.
Modern critical editions (like Rahlfs–Hanhart and the Göttingen Septuagint) provide scholarly texts; modern translations (e.g., NETS) make it accessible in English. Far from being a curiosity, the Septuagint is a living, studied, and debated text that continues to shape theology, exegesis, and canon discussions.

Summary

The Septuagint began as a Jewish translation project in Alexandria, driven by the needs of Greek‑speaking Jews who no longer understood Hebrew. Its contents include the full Hebrew Bible as well as additional books that later became known as the Deuterocanon or Apocrypha. Written in Koine Greek with strong Semitic influence, the Septuagint reflects multiple translators working across different eras, producing a text with varied styles and translation philosophies. Historically, it shaped the thought world of early Judaism, influenced major figures such as Philo and Josephus, and became the Old Testament of the early Christian Church. The New Testament writers frequently quote the Septuagint, making it central to Christian theology and exegesis.
The Septuagint’s verifiability is supported by major manuscripts (Vaticanus, Sinaiticus, Alexandrinus), early citations, and comparison with Hebrew sources such as the Masoretic Text and Dead Sea Scrolls. Today, it remains the liturgical Old Testament of the Eastern Orthodox Church, a key textual witness for scholars, and an indispensable resource for understanding how ancient communities interpreted Scripture. Far from being a relic, the Septuagint continues to shape modern biblical studies, canon debates, and theological reflection.

Side‑by‑Side Comparison: Septuagint (LXX) vs Masoretic Text (MT)

Key Passages Where the Readings Diverge Significantly

1. Isaiah 7:14 — Virgin Birth Prophecy

Masoretic Text (MT)

“Behold, a young woman (ʿalmāh) shall conceive…”

Septuagint (LXX)

“Behold, a virgin (parthenos) shall conceive…”

Significance

The LXX uses parthenos (“virgin”), which is the exact word Matthew quotes in Matthew 1:23. The MT’s “young woman” is less specific. This is one of the most famous theological divergences.

2. Psalm 22:16 — Crucifixion Imagery

Masoretic Text (MT)

“…like a lion are my hands and my feet.”

Septuagint (LXX)

“They pierced my hands and my feet.”

Significance

The LXX reading matches Christian interpretation of crucifixion and is quoted in early Christian writings. The MT reading is awkward and difficult (“like a lion”). Dead Sea Scrolls support the LXX‑type reading (“pierced”).

3. Psalm 40:6 — Incarnation and Hebrews 10

Masoretic Text (MT)

“You have dug/opened my ears.”

Septuagint (LXX)

“A body you prepared for me.”

Significance

The author of Hebrews quotes the LXX directly (Heb. 10:5). The LXX reading supports the incarnation; the MT reading does not. This is a major theological divergence.

4. Deuteronomy 32:43 — Messianic and Angelic Worship

Masoretic Text (MT)

Shorter version; lacks references to angels and nations worshiping.

Septuagint (LXX)

“Rejoice, O heavens, with Him; let all the angels of God worship Him; let all the sons of God strengthen themselves in Him…”

Significance

Hebrews 1:6 quotes the LXX line: “Let all the angels of God worship Him.” This line does not exist in the MT. Huge Christological importance.

5. Jeremiah 31:31–34 — New Covenant Structure

Masoretic Text (MT)

Standard Hebrew version.

Septuagint (LXX)

Jeremiah is arranged differently; chapter numbers differ; wording varies slightly.

Significance

The NT quotes the LXX‑style Jeremiah extensively (Hebrews 8–10). The LXX preserves a different textual tradition of Jeremiah — often shorter and more coherent.

6. Amos 9:11–12 — Gentile Inclusion

Masoretic Text (MT)

“…that they may possess the remnant of Edom…”

Septuagint (LXX)

“…that the remnant of mankind may seek the Lord…”

Significance

James quotes the LXX in Acts 15:17. The MT reading (“Edom”) is ethnic; the LXX reading (“mankind”) is universal. This affects the theology of Gentile inclusion.

7. Proverbs 17:8 — Different Meaning Entirely

Masoretic Text (MT)

“A bribe is a charm to its giver…”

Septuagint (LXX)

“A precious stone is a good gift to him who receives it…”

Significance

The LXX avoids endorsing bribery; the MT is more literal. Shows how translators sometimes softened problematic Hebrew idioms.

8. Daniel 9:24–27 — Messianic Timeline

Masoretic Text (MT)

Standard Hebrew version.

Septuagint (LXX)

The Greek version of Daniel is Theodotion’s revision, not the original LXX Daniel. Original LXX Daniel differs significantly in wording and structure.

Significance

Early Christians used the Greek Daniel heavily. Theodotion replaced the older LXX Daniel in Christian manuscripts because it aligned better with Hebrew tradition.

9. Genesis 4:7 — Sin and Mastery

Masoretic Text (MT)

“…sin is crouching at the door… but you must rule over it.”

Septuagint (LXX)

“…sin is crouching at the door… but it desires you, and you must master it.”

Significance

The LXX emphasizes sin’s desire for Cain, paralleling Genesis 3:16. Shows early Jewish interpretive tradition.

10. Job — Entire Book Differences

Masoretic Text (MT)

Longer, more complex Hebrew poetry.

Septuagint (LXX)

About 15% shorter, with rearranged sections.

Significance

Shows that Job circulated in multiple Hebrew forms. LXX Job is often clearer and smoother.
 
Last edited:

jswauto

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 19, 2025
Messages
874
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

Summary of Key Differences

The Septuagint often:

  • preserves older Hebrew readings (supported by Dead Sea Scrolls),
  • uses clearer or more theological language,
  • aligns with New Testament quotations,
  • includes additional books and expansions,
  • reflects Second Temple Jewish interpretation.

The Masoretic Text often:

  • reflects later standardized Hebrew tradition (7th–10th century AD),
  • is more literal and conservative,
  • lacks some messianic or angelic lines found in the LXX,
  • differs in order, length, and vocabulary in several books.

New Testament writers overwhelmingly quote the Septuagint, not the Masoretic Text.

This is why the Septuagint is essential for:
  • Christian theology
  • Messianic prophecy
  • textual criticism
  • canon studies
  • understanding the apostles’ Bible
 
Top Bottom