Horror of Horrors! You may already be chipped!

[Stravinsk]

Just thought I'd throw this out there to see if anyone here has seen/can get similar results.

Despite "fact checkers" denying vaccinated people can be detected via bluetooth searching devices, I've found no other explanation for it. When I search for available devices to pair with my phone, scores of them come up when I am in a public place.

When I walk through my neighborhood, several often come up for each house I pass.

Sometimes, they are obviously a bluetooth ready piece of equipment, as the name indicates, such as a television.
Bluetooth ready phones display a distinct phone icon, so it's obvious they are a phone.

However, most of the devices that come up have no name, just a mac address and a bluetooth signal. These are "unknown" bluetooth devices, and by my observation of the numbers of them (public place vs less public place) they appear to be people. When I am alone in my home no bluetooth devices show up except my phone itself.

Here's how to scan if you are using an Android phone. First you must allow your phone to pick up non-named blue-tooth devices. Here's how to do that:


A) Settings/System/AboutPhone
B) Scroll to "Build Number"
C) Tap this 7 times
D) Enter Pin when asked
E) Now your /System has "Developer Options"
F) Select "Show Bluetooth devices without names" from the Developer options menu.

Here's how to see all bluetooth devices (known and unknown):

Go to settings, then Bluetooth and device connect, then bluetooth
Select "pair new device"

All bluetooth devices within range will register. Phones will display a "phone" icon and are usually named. Other normal bluetooth devices (such as Televisions etc) usually also have a name.

The ones you are looking for are the unknown devices that only show a bluetooth symbol and a MAC address such as: DC:9A:06:32:06:B0

 

[Stravinsk]

So...

I needed to go out again today, a little later in the evening, when there were much less people about in the shopping center I was at earlier in the day.

I parked in the same area and checked available bluetooth devices. There were a few cars around but no people (I am in the parking lot). Nothing showed up on a scan. Contrast to earlier in the day, multiple un-named MAC addresses had popped up.

Next, I went to a nearby grocer a block or so away. Sat in my car and scanned for un-named MAC addresses. This was more interesting. More people were coming and going here so I could see if MAC addresses would appear and disappear as they got within range then out of range. My phone doesn't stop showing a device when it's out of range, I have to re-scan.

An old man walks from the grocery store. Within maybe 30 or so feet from my car I get a new un-named MAC address. I take note of the numbers. He got in his car and drove away. This was ideal as no one else came near or left at this time. I re-scanned and the MAC address was now gone.

A family pulled up and parked next to my car. I noticed 2 new MAC addresses (un-named) and a phone icon (named). They went into the grocery store. I re-scanned and the MAC addresses were now gone and so was the phone. Several minutes later they returned, and I re-scanned. Sure enough, 2 more MAC addresses were present as well as the same (named) phone.

I sat in my car just doing this for maybe 30 minutes, watching as a new un-named MAC address would show up and I'd lift my head to see a car pass behind me, or a person walk by. A Taxi pulled close. Another un-named MAC address, and also...a computer icon (named) and phone icon (named). My guess is that this was all from the taxi, the driver, his taxi computer and personal phone.

A year ago, I had seen this and thought "hmm...interesting but maybe far fetched?" What I've learned since is that at the time this was hitting the internet, people would search for Bluetooth devices to pair and were surprised to see masses of un-named MAC addresses. Since that time Android released a system upgrade that eliminated this feature and put it behind the "Developer Options" I mentioned in the first post. This is why one must either use an older version of Android or know how to access Developer Options. Without that feature turned on, only named devices show up (like phones, computers, tv's etc).

 

[1689Dave]

So...

I needed to go out again today, a little later in the evening, when there were much less people about in the shopping center I was at earlier in the day.

I parked in the same area and checked available bluetooth devices. There were a few cars around but no people (I am in the parking lot). Nothing showed up on a scan. Contrast to earlier in the day, multiple un-named MAC addresses had popped up.

Next, I went to a nearby grocer a block or so away. Sat in my car and scanned for un-named MAC addresses. This was more interesting. More people were coming and going here so I could see if MAC addresses would appear and disappear as they got within range then out of range. My phone doesn't stop showing a device when it's out of range, I have to re-scan.

An old man walks from the grocery store. Within maybe 30 or so feet from my car I get a new un-named MAC address. I take note of the numbers. He got in his car and drove away. This was ideal as no one else came near or left at this time. I re-scanned and the MAC address was now gone.

A family pulled up and parked next to my car. I noticed 2 new MAC addresses (un-named) and a phone icon (named). They went into the grocery store. I re-scanned and the MAC addresses were now gone and so was the phone. Several minutes later they returned, and I re-scanned. Sure enough, 2 more MAC addresses were present as well as the same (named) phone.

I sat in my car just doing this for maybe 30 minutes, watching as a new un-named MAC address would show up and I'd lift my head to see a car pass behind me, or a person walk by. A Taxi pulled close. Another un-named MAC address, and also...a computer icon (named) and phone icon (named). My guess is that this was all from the taxi, the driver, his taxi computer and personal phone.

A year ago, I had seen this and thought "hmm...interesting but maybe far fetched?" What I've learned since is that at the time this was hitting the internet, people would search for Bluetooth devices to pair and were surprised to see masses of un-named MAC addresses. Since that time Android released a system upgrade that eliminated this feature and put it behind the "Developer Options" I mentioned in the first post. This is why one must either use an older version of Android or know how to access Developer Options. Without that feature turned on, only named devices show up (like phones, computers, tv's etc).

Do you think this is the Mark of the Beast? The Mark has been recognizable since the 10th century when Catholics first realized the Papacy was the Antichrist.

 

[Stravinsk]

Do you think this is the Mark of the Beast? The Mark has been recognizable since the 10th century when Catholics first realized the Papacy was the Antichrist.

At the present time, I can still buy and sell as a vaccine-free person. However, not long ago the powers that be in my area were requiring proof of vaccination to just about everywhere but grocery stores. This has stopped, for now. So if this was it - then it either had to refer to a short period of time, or a time in the future when such technology is used to enforce financial transactions.

So, I don't know for sure. I have come across some very intriguing (beyond the scope of this thread for sure) ponderings that relate to the vaxx, DNA altering, the original number of genes said to be in the human genome (by the discoverer of the double Helix structure of Human DNA) along with the Mark as it relates to 666 - but, intriguing as they may be, it's hard for me to dogmatically state I believe one way or the other. If in the future I am required to get a DNA altering jab to buy and sell, then I'd lean more toward that. At present my thoughts are that this is something very close, if it isn't it. Perhaps the real thing or perhaps a prelude to it. I'm undecided, tbh.

 

[1689Dave]

At the present time, I can still buy and sell as a vaccine-free person. However, not long ago the powers that be in my area were requiring proof of vaccination to just about everywhere but grocery stores. This has stopped, for now. So if this was it - then it either had to refer to a short period of time, or a time in the future when such technology is used to enforce financial transactions.

So, I don't know for sure. I have come across some very intriguing (beyond the scope of this thread for sure) ponderings that relate to the vaxx, DNA altering, the original number of genes said to be in the human genome (by the discoverer of the double Helix structure of Human DNA) along with the Mark as it relates to 666 - but, intriguing as they may be, it's hard for me to dogmatically state I believe one way or the other. If in the future I am required to get a DNA altering jab to buy and sell, then I'd lean more toward that. At present my thoughts are that this is something very close, if it isn't it. Perhaps the real thing or perhaps a prelude to it. I'm undecided, tbh.

My wife and I do not trust the present top medical establishment so we are sheltering in place rather than vaxxing. But the Mark of the beast is not a chip, it's a mindset many already have and have had since the first century.

 

[tango]

So...

I needed to go out again today, a little later in the evening, when there were much less people about in the shopping center I was at earlier in the day.

I parked in the same area and checked available bluetooth devices. There were a few cars around but no people (I am in the parking lot). Nothing showed up on a scan. Contrast to earlier in the day, multiple un-named MAC addresses had popped up.

Next, I went to a nearby grocer a block or so away. Sat in my car and scanned for un-named MAC addresses. This was more interesting. More people were coming and going here so I could see if MAC addresses would appear and disappear as they got within range then out of range. My phone doesn't stop showing a device when it's out of range, I have to re-scan.

An old man walks from the grocery store. Within maybe 30 or so feet from my car I get a new un-named MAC address. I take note of the numbers. He got in his car and drove away. This was ideal as no one else came near or left at this time. I re-scanned and the MAC address was now gone.

A family pulled up and parked next to my car. I noticed 2 new MAC addresses (un-named) and a phone icon (named). They went into the grocery store. I re-scanned and the MAC addresses were now gone and so was the phone. Several minutes later they returned, and I re-scanned. Sure enough, 2 more MAC addresses were present as well as the same (named) phone.

I sat in my car just doing this for maybe 30 minutes, watching as a new un-named MAC address would show up and I'd lift my head to see a car pass behind me, or a person walk by. A Taxi pulled close. Another un-named MAC address, and also...a computer icon (named) and phone icon (named). My guess is that this was all from the taxi, the driver, his taxi computer and personal phone.

A year ago, I had seen this and thought "hmm...interesting but maybe far fetched?" What I've learned since is that at the time this was hitting the internet, people would search for Bluetooth devices to pair and were surprised to see masses of un-named MAC addresses. Since that time Android released a system upgrade that eliminated this feature and put it behind the "Developer Options" I mentioned in the first post. This is why one must either use an older version of Android or know how to access Developer Options. Without that feature turned on, only named devices show up (like phones, computers, tv's etc).

Back when people were first talking about tracking chips in the vaccine I wondered whether it was technically possible. The biggest question I'd have is how such a device would be powered, given it needs enough power to transmit a radio signal. I'm not sure how, or even whether, you could build something with a long-term power source, unique ID and radio transmitter that was small enough it could fit through a needle. You'd also need to be able to separate the unique IDs, which I can't see how you'd do if you've got multiple doses of a vaccine inside a single vial.

These days there are so many things that connect via Bluetooth it could be just about anything. The old man you mentioned could have any combination of a cellphone, smartwatch, headphones etc. If only a single device showed up when he was nearby my guess would be a phone or a smartwatch.

 

[Stravinsk]

Back when people were first talking about tracking chips in the vaccine I wondered whether it was technically possible. The biggest question I'd have is how such a device would be powered, given it needs enough power to transmit a radio signal. I'm not sure how, or even whether, you could build something with a long-term power source, unique ID and radio transmitter that was small enough it could fit through a needle. You'd also need to be able to separate the unique IDs, which I can't see how you'd do if you've got multiple doses of a vaccine inside a single vial.

The human body is not just biological, but electrical. We can be killed by an outside electrical force because we conduct it and it's used throughout to send signals for various purposes. Even me sitting here typing this involves electrical impulses from my brain to my fingers. It is not hard for me to imagine a way was found to power something so tiny as nanotechnology using nothing but the human body. The stuff they are finding in some of vaxxed is called graphine oxide - which by the way, is a super-conductor of electricity.

ID separating would be simple if the tech is designed to alter DNA (which is the whole point - mRNA - (modify)RNA)), as DNA is unique to individuals this would be done in vivo. Although I don't know specifics, this seems like the logical choice.

These days there are so many things that connect via Bluetooth it could be just about anything. The old man you mentioned could have any combination of a cellphone, smartwatch, headphones etc. If only a single device showed up when he was nearby my guess would be a phone or a smartwatch.

Except on my scan phones show up as phones. Headsets show up as headsets. All the commercial bluetooth devices almost always have names. His didn't.

The Taxi driver, when he pulled up next to me, 3 bluetooth devices immediately showed up:

1) A computer icon with name (his taxi computer, almost certain)
2) A phone icon with name (his personal phone)
3) An unknown bluetooth address (that is likely to be him, as he had no passengers).

 

[tango]

The human body is not just biological, but electrical. We can be killed by an outside electrical force because we conduct it and it's used throughout to send signals for various purposes. Even me sitting here typing this involves electrical impulses from my brain to my fingers. It is not hard for me to imagine a way was found to power something so tiny as nanotechnology using nothing but the human body. The stuff they are finding in some of vaxxed is called graphine oxide - which by the way, is a super-conductor of electricity.

ID separating would be simple if the tech is designed to alter DNA (which is the whole point - mRNA - (modify)RNA)), as DNA is unique to individuals this would be done in vivo. Although I don't know specifics, this seems like the logical choice.

Yes, but you still need to make something that is small enough to fit through a hypodermic needle and still powerful enough to power itself, identify itself and broadcast itself over Bluetooth.

Except on my scan phones show up as phones. Headsets show up as headsets. All the commercial bluetooth devices almost always have names. His didn't.

The Taxi driver, when he pulled up next to me, 3 bluetooth devices immediately showed up:

1) A computer icon with name (his taxi computer, almost certain)
2) A phone icon with name (his personal phone)
3) An unknown bluetooth address (that is likely to be him, as he had no passengers).

If you assume your theory about being chipped is true then the unknown address might be him.

I've seen several Bluetooth devices over the years that don't identify themselves but turn out to be phones, keyboards, headsets etc, so I don't think a few things that don't identify themselves is necessarily proof of anything in particular.

 

[Stravinsk]

Yes, but you still need to make something that is small enough to fit through a hypodermic needle and still powerful enough to power itself, identify itself and broadcast itself over Bluetooth.

Nanotechnology/Graphine Oxide based. Doesn't need to power itself, as I said before, it uses the host's power like a parasite. This stuff is so small it can be powered by light and small magnetic forces.

It seems to me like you are new to this information. You might be surprised it's actually starting to make it to the mainstream:

What’s inside the Jabs? The Truth Continues to Emerge

If you assume your theory about being chipped is true then the unknown address might be him.

I've seen several Bluetooth devices over the years that don't identify themselves but turn out to be phones, keyboards, headsets etc, so I don't think a few things that don't identify themselves is necessarily proof of anything in particular.

One incident is not proof of anything in particular, but I dare say it's a stretch to believe that large groups of people automatically = large amounts of MAC addresses because they are all using bluetooth tech as they walk/drive around? Even a phone isn't going to register unless it's turned on.

All one needs to do is find 1 vaccinated person who isn't wearing a smartwatch, carrying a turned on phone, wearing headsets etc in an area with no bluetooth devices around. If they emit a MAC address, it proves the "theory". As I sit here typing this in my home, I have a computer, keyboard, mouse, modem, extra storage drives etc. They are relatively modern. No bluetooth connectivity at all. I have to buy a special usb for this. The only thing giving off a MAC address is my phone (which is named as most are).

 

[Lamb]

Do you think the other bluetooth devices could be Fitbits or something similar? My Fitbit has bluetooth capabilities, but I don't use it that way because it made my data rates on my phone go too high.

 

[Stravinsk]

Do you think the other bluetooth devices could be Fitbits or something similar? My Fitbit has bluetooth capabilities, but I don't use it that way because it made my data rates on my phone go too high.

I don't know what Fitbits are. I don't know if they show up on bluetooth scans (as un-named devices). What I know is that I can sit in my car in a near empty parking-lot and my phone sees no mysterious MAC addresses. When the parking lot has people in it, my phone can see MAC addresses. If this is all innocent, then I must make the assumption that every person has some device on them that broadcasts through bluetooth. I find this assumption very illogical and unlikely.

 

[Lamb]

I don't know what Fitbits are. I don't know if they show up on bluetooth scans (as un-named devices). What I know is that I can sit in my car in a near empty parking-lot and my phone sees no mysterious MAC addresses. When the parking lot has people in it, my phone can see MAC addresses. If this is all innocent, then I must make the assumption that every person has some device on them that broadcasts through bluetooth. I find this assumption very illogical and unlikely.

I'll have to check later how Fitbits show up. They're to track steps and miles for activity.

 

[tango]

Nanotechnology/Graphine Oxide based. Doesn't need to power itself, as I said before, it uses the host's power like a parasite. This stuff is so small it can be powered by light and small magnetic forces.

It seems to me like you are new to this information. You might be surprised it's actually starting to make it to the mainstream:

What’s inside the Jabs? The Truth Continues to Emerge

I'm not up to date on nanotechnology but still don't find it entirely credible that such a device could be produced, let alone produced in such a way that each person gets one and only one such tracker and that it continues to function reliably over an extended period. When the first rumblings about people being chipped emerged I talked to a friend of mine who is a doctor of microbiology, albeit not in the field of nanotechnology, and he shared my skepticism.

One incident is not proof of anything in particular, but I dare say it's a stretch to believe that large groups of people automatically = large amounts of MAC addresses because they are all using bluetooth tech as they walk/drive around? Even a phone isn't going to register unless it's turned on.

Hence my first assumption would be that it's far more likely to be a smartwatch, headphone, speaker or something else rather than anything to do with the vaccine. I don't know what your area is like but around here it seems more or less everybody wears a smartwatch. If someone is into fitness they could conceivably also have any combination of heart rate monitor, foot pod, running dynamics tracker, temperature sensor, bike speed sensor, bike cadence sensor, bike power meter etc etc etc. Many of these communicate using ANT rather than Bluetooth but some of them use Bluetooth or have capabilities to use either.

All one needs to do is find 1 vaccinated person who isn't wearing a smartwatch, carrying a turned on phone, wearing headsets etc in an area with no bluetooth devices around. If they emit a MAC address, it proves the "theory". As I sit here typing this in my home, I have a computer, keyboard, mouse, modem, extra storage drives etc. They are relatively modern. No bluetooth connectivity at all. I have to buy a special usb for this. The only thing giving off a MAC address is my phone (which is named as most are).

The things you have listed don't necessarily use Bluetooth. I have a wireless keyboard that connects via a USB dongle that doesn't use Bluetooth. I'm typing this on a Bluetooth keyboard that definitely does.

My laptop is Bluetooth enabled although it's usually switched off. My phone and tablet are BT enabled, as is the keyboard I use for the tablet that I just mentioned. My wife also has a phone and tablet, and we both have smartwatches. We also have a couple of Bluetooth speakers around the house, and a spare cellphone that's more for visitors to use than anything else but that is also BT enabled.

It would certainly be harder to explain if people who are vaccinated clearly do have a MAC address if people who are unvaccinated do not. I don't know I'd regard the theory as proven either way on the basis of one person though - people have been experimenting with implanted chips and the like for at least 20-30 years. If a person who emitted a MAC address turned out to be something like, say, a cybernetics professor who had implanted a chip under their own skin as an experiment might be emitting a MAC address through nothing more unexpected than their own experimentation.

Incidentally, are you assuming a vaccinated person who has been chipped would only emit one MAC address? If someone is vaccinated and boosted, how do you propose the multiple chips they presumably received would know which one was to be dominant so the others could fall silent?

 

[tango]

As an aside, it's a shame the video producers couldn't be bothered to print the text sufficiently clearly to easily read it, or indeed to just post a transcript since at least the first minute or two seems to be nothing more than someone reading the blurry text on the screen.

 

[Stravinsk]

As an aside, it's a shame the video producers couldn't be bothered to print the text sufficiently clearly to easily read it, or indeed to just post a transcript since at least the first minute or two seems to be nothing more than someone reading the blurry text on the screen.

The video host (odysee) frequently has this issue. I've found that setting the playback to a higher resolution usually fixes it.

The article can be found here: Wot’s in the shots? | The Spectator Australia

And archived here: Wot’s in the shots? | The Spectator Australia

 

[tango]

The video host (odysee) frequently has this issue. I've found that setting the playback to a higher resolution usually fixes it.

The article can be found here: Wot’s in the shots? | The Spectator Australia

And archived here: Wot’s in the shots? | The Spectator Australia

Thanks, I can read the article and get an idea of what they are saying now.

 

[tango]

It's a shame they didn't post the video so people could see what they were describing.

From what I can tell of the description it could be something sinister but could also be something utterly unremarkable.

 

[Stravinsk]

It's a shame they didn't post the video so people could see what they were describing.

From what I can tell of the description it could be something sinister but could also be something utterly unremarkable.

Note: If Odysee video is blurry, set the resolution to 720 or higher and not "Auto". This should fix this problem.


Dr. Andreas Noack , German (deceased) released just days
after his death (world expert in graphene oxide). 2021 (re-upload today)

Vaxx_microscope_(German)

By Dr. Ariyana Love

odysee.com

Apologies most of the English translation comes through but do to formatting some was lost on the peripherals.

Report from New Zealand

New Zealand vaccine discovery

A scientist explaining the what was found in the vaccines in New Zealand

odysee.com

Teaser shots (David Nixon)

Dark field microscopy by Dr David Nixon

Source: TEAM ENIGMA (Sasha Latypova)

odysee.com

Interview with David Nixon:
Pfizer Vials Under Microscope - Structures Grow in Electromagnetic Field - Dr. David Nixon

There are several others, most not in English, but you can watch the "Report from New Zealand" for more names to investigate if interested.