So interesting when people who are not Lutherans quote him as the infallible, authoritative one.....
When quoting Luther, it's always good to note not only where but when he said that - and in what context. Luther was a Catholic for good portion of his life, and there were many years of transition.
Of course, I've quoted Luther (with a date) when he very clearly states that the unique set of Deutero/Apocrypha books typically included in the lectionary and Catholic Bibles in GERMANY during his years as a Catholic teacher which Luther included with the Scriptures in his German tome, he clearly stated "these are not canonical." He encourages people to read "them" he says they are "useful" and of course "they" are IN his German Bible (one MORE OT book than modern Catholic Bibles) but he makes it clear that in his personal opinion, they are not canonical; good to include with the Scriptures but not canonical. My study Bible has a LOT of stuff in it included with the Scriptures that not one person on the planet considers canonical (Maps, etc.)
I reject the premise that if something is good to read, ERGO it must be the inerrant, divinely and verbatlly inspired words of God and thus canonical for Chrsitian teaching/doctrine. I can think of a few hundred books I'd recommend every Christian read but I wouldn't regard a single word in any of them to be the inscripturated words of God OR canonical.
Is the Prophecy of Daniel 11 fulfilled in some book? No. Is it POSSIBLE that something mentioned in a book is the fulfillment of such? Sure, it's POSSIBLE. Even if that book were NOT at all Scripture or canonical. Why..... how many books talk about
Christmas (many canonical Books prophecy that event) but does that make every book and song and poem about Christmas ERGO canonical inspired words of God of EXACTLY the same nature and use as say the Letter to the Romans in our NT?