Welcome to Christianity Haven, thank you for visiting! If you have not already, we invite you to create an account and join in on the many discussions we have!
It wasn't regional, the entire world was transformedLiteral occurrence in history. Whether the flood was worldwide or regional is something I wonder about but I don't question the overall account. I also tend to believe the account as there are a number of flood 'narratives' in different cultures, First Nations in particular
It's not just a "story". If we start thinking that every event in the bible is just a story then why would we trust that the crucifixion and resurrection actually happened too?
It wasn't regional
the entire world was transformed
In order for it to be literal a multitude of miracles would have to have taken place.
It wasn't regional, the entire world was transformed
Cool! Like what?
The article ends with the question: "If God is omnipotent, why not kill what He wanted killed directly? Why resort to a roundabout method that requires innumerable additional miracles?"
That question is interesting, I didn't read the article btw because that question alone sounds like a complaint against God, I mean seriously as Christians we know for a fact that the lake of fire is reserved for the devil and his angels and followers and that it exists so why should we have doubts about a former judgment?
The article ends with the question: "If God is omnipotent, why not kill what He wanted killed directly? Why resort to a roundabout method that requires innumerable additional miracles?"
It would certainly seem to be unless a slew of miracles were performed over the years of the construction and gathering of the animals.So do you believe that Noah’s Ark was just a figurative story?
Why or why not?