It wasn't regional, the entire world was transformedLiteral occurrence in history. Whether the flood was worldwide or regional is something I wonder about but I don't question the overall account. I also tend to believe the account as there are a number of flood 'narratives' in different cultures, First Nations in particular
It's not just a "story". If we start thinking that every event in the bible is just a story then why would we trust that the crucifixion and resurrection actually happened too?
It wasn't regional
the entire world was transformed
In order for it to be literal a multitude of miracles would have to have taken place.
It wasn't regional, the entire world was transformed
Cool! Like what?
The article ends with the question: "If God is omnipotent, why not kill what He wanted killed directly? Why resort to a roundabout method that requires innumerable additional miracles?"
That question is interesting, I didn't read the article btw because that question alone sounds like a complaint against God, I mean seriously as Christians we know for a fact that the lake of fire is reserved for the devil and his angels and followers and that it exists so why should we have doubts about a former judgment?
The article ends with the question: "If God is omnipotent, why not kill what He wanted killed directly? Why resort to a roundabout method that requires innumerable additional miracles?"
It would certainly seem to be unless a slew of miracles were performed over the years of the construction and gathering of the animals.So do you believe that Noah’s Ark was just a figurative story?
Why or why not?