Catholic Church definition of the canonical scriptures.

[Lees]

What is "deception"? (Lees only, please)

See post #(2) and (5).

Lees

 

[NathanH83]

The passages were written by Jews in the centuries before Christ was born. I am confident that no Romans wrote any of them

That’s right. They’re Jewish books, not Roman Catholic books.

 

[MoreCoffee]

That’s right. They’re Jewish books, not Roman Catholic books.

Most ancient Romans were pagans, not Catholics.

 

[Lees]

@MoreCoffee

What's the 'R' stand for in RCC?

Lees

 

[Andrew]

@MoreCoffee

What's the 'R' stand for in RCC?

Look for a 16 Chapter book in your King James NT, I believe it's called "Romans"..

 

[Lees]

Look for a 16 Chapter book in your King James NT, I believe it's called "Romans"..

I know what the 'R' stands for, as does MoreCoffee. I am interested in his refusal to acknowlege it.

Lees

 

[ImaginaryDay2]

See post #(2) and (5).

Lees

I did. Definitions can be subjective. I'd like yours

 

[Andrew]

@MoreCoffee

Your Roman list is incomplete and deceptive.

In the Book of Esther Rome has also added apocryphal writings and deceptively weaved them throughout the book.

In the Book of Daniel, Rome has done the same thing, adding the apocryphal books of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon.

Lees

So you are a King James Only right?
you should be well versed in these books then.

 

[Lees]

I did. Definitions can be subjective. I'd like yours

I gave you mine.

Lees

 

[Lees]

So you are a King James Only right?
you should be well versed in these books then.

What books?

Lees

 

[ImaginaryDay2]

I gave you mine.

Lees

Well, indirect answers is one type. Thanks for the example

 

[Lees]

Well, indirect answers is one type. Thanks for the example

Nothing indirect about it.

Is English your first language? Honest question.

Lees

 

[ImaginaryDay2]

Nothing indirect about it.

Is English your first language? Honest question.

Lees

Since it is, I'm going to try this again, smart guy. What is your definition of "deception". I don't want an example, I want you to tell me your definition.

And where are the moderators on these boards? Is English my first language? Come on...

 

[Lamb]

Since it is, I'm going to try this again, smart guy. What is your definition of "deception". I don't want an example, I want you to tell me your definition.

And where are the moderators on these boards? Is English my first language? Come on...

We have members here from other countries and English is not their first language so his question is valid.

 

[ImaginaryDay2]

We have members here from other countries and English is not their first language so his question is valid.

Following the conversatioin, anyone can see I speak English quite well. But nevermind.

 

[ImaginaryDay2]

(MoreCoffee's) Roman list is incomplete and deceptive.

In the Book of Esther Rome has also added apocryphal writings and deceptively weaved them throughout the book.

In the Book of Daniel, Rome has done the same thing, adding the apocryphal books of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon.

Lees

Let's try this. I've referred to your previous posts. In them you state that Rome has "...added apocryphal writings and deceptively weaved them..."
You've also said, referring to the Book of Daniel, Rome has "...(added) the apocryphal books of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon"

Therefore, please cite these passages, chapter and verse, and explain to me how this is a deception - knowing full well that this is a "Roman Bible" as you refer to it later:

No, it is your Roman list. Which I said, is very deceptive. You try and weave in spurious writings in the Book of Esther and Daniel, and don't want to tell anyone. Which is why they are not listed in your 'Roman' list.

All one has to do is obtain a Roman Bible and see for yourself.

It appears you are confused as to who is deceptive. If you are suggesting MoreCoffee is being deceptive in his list of list of Canonical books, say so. But if one is reading a "Roman Bible", then there is no deception. You go into it with full knowledge of what it is.

 

[Lees]

Let's try this. I've referred to your previous posts. In them you state that Rome has "...added apocryphal writings and deceptively weaved them..."
You've also said, referring to the Book of Daniel, Rome has "...(added) the apocryphal books of Susanna and Bel and the Dragon"

Therefore, please cite these passages, chapter and verse, and explain to me how this is a deception - knowing full well that this is a "Roman Bible" as you refer to it later:


It appears you are confused as to who is deceptive. If you are suggesting MoreCoffee is being deceptive in his list of list of Canonical books, say so. But if one is reading a "Roman Bible", then there is no deception. You go into it with full knowledge of what it is.

Try any thing you like. I have said more than the 'Book of Daniel'. Please keep up.

I have explained the deception. See again post #(2) and (5).

I did say so. See again post #(2) and (5). @MoreCoffee is being deceptive in his list of Canonical books. Do you want me to say it again? Ok. @MoreCoffee is beign deceptive in his list of Canonical books. Do you want me to say it again?

I'm not confused. You're the one confused. Try and keep up.

Lees

 

[Lees]

Since it is, I'm going to try this again, smart guy. What is your definition of "deception". I don't want an example, I want you to tell me your definition.

And where are the moderators on these boards? Is English my first language? Come on...

Glad to hear it....that English is your first language.

Deception means to deceive. That was deep wasn't it? Now...wait for it...you want to know what deceive means? Right?

OK. To one who knows the English language, you are not doing very well....are you? Does 'is' really mean 'is'?

Mr Merriam Webster Dictionary: 1.) ensnare 2.) to be false 3.) cheat 4.) to cause to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid 5.) to while away, to practice deceit.

Hows that? Everything clear now?

Lees

 

[ImaginaryDay2]

Try any thing you like. I have said more than the 'Book of Daniel'.

I have explained the deception. See again post #(2) and (5).

You've given a vague example of where they can be found. I've asked you for specific passages now

I did say so. See again post #(2) and (5). @MoreCoffee is being deceptive in his list of Canonical books. Do you want me to say it again? Ok. @MoreCoffee is beign deceptive in his list of Canonical books.

You did not state this specifically earlier, but thank you for doing so now

 

[ImaginaryDay2]

Mr Merriam Webster Dictionary: 1.) ensnare 2.) to be false 3.) cheat 4.) to cause to accept as true or valid what is false or invalid 5.) to while away, to practice deceit.

Being that you have referenced a "Roman Bible", how is it deception to find things that would reasonably be found there?