NathanH83
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 9, 2019
- Messages
- 2,278
- Age
- 42
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
My thoughts on the subject are typed up in a PDF, available here:
Welcome to Christianity Haven, thank you for visiting! If you have not already, we invite you to create an account and join in on the many discussions we have!
All who die in God’s grace, but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation; but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven (1030).
And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come (Matthew 12:32, emphasis added).
The very first thing I noticed was this demonstrably false claim.
After all, out of the oldest copies of the Greek Septuagint, all of them contained these
books. Whether it’s Codex Vaticanus from the 4th century, or Codex Alexandrinus from
the 5th century, or Codex Sinaiticus from the 4th century. These are all ancient copies of
the Septuagint, and they contain these “Apocryphal” books.
(1) All the books of the Maccabees are missing in Codex Vaticanus.
(2) Codex Sinaiticus contains ONLY 1st Maccabees and 4th Maccabees.
(3) Codex Alexandrinus contains 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Maccabees.
Thus 2 Maccabees is missing from two of the above codices.
I know.Origen, it's annoying how you point out facts.![]()
The very first thing I noticed was this demonstrably false claim.
After all, out of the oldest copies of the Greek Septuagint, all of them contained these
books. Whether it’s Codex Vaticanus from the 4th century, or Codex Alexandrinus from
the 5th century, or Codex Sinaiticus from the 4th century. These are all ancient copies of
the Septuagint, and they contain these “Apocryphal” books.
(1) All the books of the Maccabees are missing in Codex Vaticanus.
(2) Codex Sinaiticus contains ONLY 1st Maccabees and 4th Maccabees.
(3) Codex Alexandrinus contains 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th Maccabees.
Thus 2 Maccabees is missing from two of the above codices.
Not really. Finding demonstrably false claims lets everyone know the poor academic quality of the work.A technicality that is irrelevant to the discussion about how 2 Maccabees endorses purgatory.
Not really. Finding demonstrably false claims lets everyone know the poor academic quality of the work.
Of course it's a wholesome and saintly thought to pray for mercy on the dead, it shows compassion and honest hope ...but that is all it is.. a thought... it does not say that it's a holy and wholesome practice or sacrament, act or gesture to pray for the dead.2 Maccabees 12:46
It is therefore a holy and wholesomethought to pray for the dead, that they may be loosed from sins.
those in heaven have no sin, those in hell are eternally lost, hence purgatory!