World Britain is the least likely EU/NATO country to attack the USA due to the Anglo-American special relationship.

[Bouan Philippe]

Do you agree or not?

 

[JRT]

Do you agree or not?

To be clear, are you speaking of a military attack or of a political disagreement?

 

[Bouan Philippe]

To be clear, are you speaking of a military attack or of a political disagreement?

Presupposing a military attack, then what happens?

 

[Origen]

I vote Luxembourg.

 

[Bouan Philippe]

I vote Luxembourg.

Please clarify this.

How is Luxembourg relevant to this conversation?

 

[Albion]

How is Luxembourg relevant to this conversation?

Your original post asked if there is an EU/NATO nation that is less likely to attack the USA than Britain. Origen nominated Luxembourg, which is a member of both the EU and NATO.

 

[Origen]

Your original post asked if there is an EU/NATO nation that is less likely to attack the USA than Britain. Origen nominated Luxembourg, which is a member of both the EU and NATO.

Thank you.

 

[Bouan Philippe]

Your original post asked if there is an EU/NATO nation that is less likely to attack the USA than Britain. Origen nominated Luxembourg, which is a member of both the EU and NATO.

Luxembourg is different from the other countries which also belong to NATO and the EU, because it's less likely to attack the USA than Germany or France due to its smaller military capability, which is also small compared to the UK.

Membership of NATO and the EU is perhaps less important than the comparative military capabilities of those countries concerned.

 

[Josiah]

Ask the Japanese if it's wise to attack the USA.


I think only an IDIOT would do so.


I do think the UK is among the more "US-Friendly" nations of the world. Denmark is yet another. Canadians have a lively, popular sport of ridiculing the USA but in reality, Canada has been very friendly to the USA as well (at least since the mid-19th Century).



.



.

 

[Bouan Philippe]

Ask the Japanese if it's wise to attack the USA.


I think only an IDIOT would do so.


I do think the UK is among the more "US-Friendly" nations of the world. Denmark is yet another. Canadians have a lively, popular sport of ridiculing the USA but in reality, Canada has been very friendly to the USA as well (at least since the mid-19th Century).



.



.

Firstly, I don't take your advice seriously at all because I suspect that you've been asked to mediate this secret message by the White House based on the assumption that I would assume that YOU yourself are the original source.

Secondly, the Japanese didn't have the means to kill America's entire military personnel nor to neutralise its entire military equipment, which includes its weapons of mass destruction.

Consequently, Joe Biden's attempt to compare my situation with WW2 is not even a bad analogy, because there is no way to compare the two situations.

Whereas, Japan was no match for America during WW2, it is also true to say that America is no match for Jesus Christ and his heavenly armies in the War of Armageddon (Revelation 19:14).

Ultimately, you should tell the US Department of Defence to BRING IT, because I am one hundred percent confident in winning this war, and I know that this will be the death of America's entire history, culture, and civilisation.

For I know that God can wipe out the American people and there will be no mercy at all in this War of Armageddon, because all the enemy combatants will be killed according to Revelation 19:21.

Tell the Pentagon to BRING IT.

 

[Albion]

Luxembourg is different from the other countries which also belong to NATO and the EU, because it's less likely to attack the USA than Germany or France due to its smaller military capability, which is also small compared to the UK.

Membership of NATO and the EU is perhaps less important than the comparative military capabilities of those countries concerned.

Fine, but you didn't ask about military capabilities.

You just asked if the readers agree that there is any EU/NATO country less likely to attack the US than Britain is. I'd add that there are actually quite a few that could be named.

 

[Bouan Philippe]

Fine, but you didn't ask about military capabilities.

You just asked if the readers agree that there is any EU/NATO country less likely to attack the US than Britain is. I'd add that there are actually quite a few that could be named.

Please provide a few examples and the reasons behind it.

 

[Albion]

Please provide a few examples and the reasons behind it.

For example, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, and Ireland do not seem likely to attack, nor do they appear to have any grievances that would tempt them to try it.

 

[Bouan Philippe]

For example, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Slovenia, and Ireland do not seem likely to attack, nor do they appear to have any grievances that would tempt them to try it.

Are you suggesting that Britain attacking the US is not out of the question?

 

[Stravinsk]

I disagree. But only on how you worded your title thread. Here is how I would re-word it:

Britain is on par with other EU/NATO countries as unlikely to attack the USA due to the Economic Conditions of slavery to Rothschild owned central banks in comparison to only a few other countries.​

The USA is the same as Britain insofar as ownership of it's currency to Rothschild/Morgan Banks. Therefore, no threat. In fact, most of the countries the USA have attacked/threatened in the last couple of decades have banks outside of the international system. The people that believe their (western) countries are democracies or even Constitutional Republics are living in a faded area of history. They *used* to be, and are now only as a horse and pony show for the masses, mainly.

You work, sweat and bleed for international bankers, and your children or children's children will be slaves to them.

 

[JRT]

I don't know why the focus is on the UK when Canada is your greatest friend and staunchest ally. We are also so economically integrated that we cannot impose tariffs on each other without slicing our own throats as Trump found out.