Alithis
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 2,680
- Location
- New Zealand
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Pentecostal
- Marital Status
- Married
ok so follow this if you can .. its a scenario from some time back that raised my eyebrow and ..haha my eyebrow hasn't dropped back down yet .
party #1 .. begins attending a small baptist church .
after about 2 years others new folks join in also .some come some leave , as happens .
party#1 meet new party #2 and a new friendship begins to quickly form .
party #1 learns that party@ is expecting a child and is not in a strong financial position .
so Party #1 decides to hold a baby shower to bless party#2 because party#2 really have next to nothing (being new to the country -refugees out of what was Burma)
party#1 gives out invites to every one at the little church and throws a great little baby shower a few weeks later and party #2 is blessed and openly gives glory to God ,for they were praying fervently for the things they did not have and needed with a new baby on the way and ALL those prayers got answered .
and all is well... THEN- ( and this part is a lesson in the harmful danger of GOSSIP of ANY KIND ) -party numberr#1 gets told by parties #3 & #4 .. that other parties, being elders in the church, are very unhappy that said baby shower was organized without their foreknowledge or approval ...
PArty#1 is stunned to hear this and very confused - party number #1 met a new friends ,saw a need and responded to the need in Love -party#1 is oblivious to any requirement to seek prior acknowledgement and approval to act out of love toward new friends( ..being partry#2 )
Is this a normal demand made upon baptist congregational attendees ? or is there an underlying "control issue" present .. ? ? ?
as far as i understand, a pastor's job is to prepare the flock to do the ministry of the lord to every one else and the elders assist in thos b ministering to the flock . in which case the elder should be rejoicing that part#1 was doing exactly what ALL congregational parties should be doing .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(footnote: parties #3 & #4 were SO WRONG to repeat that information to parties #1 ... but its suspected it was said to them in hope that it would get back to Party#1 - and it did .
party #1 .. begins attending a small baptist church .
after about 2 years others new folks join in also .some come some leave , as happens .
party#1 meet new party #2 and a new friendship begins to quickly form .
party #1 learns that party@ is expecting a child and is not in a strong financial position .
so Party #1 decides to hold a baby shower to bless party#2 because party#2 really have next to nothing (being new to the country -refugees out of what was Burma)
party#1 gives out invites to every one at the little church and throws a great little baby shower a few weeks later and party #2 is blessed and openly gives glory to God ,for they were praying fervently for the things they did not have and needed with a new baby on the way and ALL those prayers got answered .
and all is well... THEN- ( and this part is a lesson in the harmful danger of GOSSIP of ANY KIND ) -party numberr#1 gets told by parties #3 & #4 .. that other parties, being elders in the church, are very unhappy that said baby shower was organized without their foreknowledge or approval ...
PArty#1 is stunned to hear this and very confused - party number #1 met a new friends ,saw a need and responded to the need in Love -party#1 is oblivious to any requirement to seek prior acknowledgement and approval to act out of love toward new friends( ..being partry#2 )
Is this a normal demand made upon baptist congregational attendees ? or is there an underlying "control issue" present .. ? ? ?
as far as i understand, a pastor's job is to prepare the flock to do the ministry of the lord to every one else and the elders assist in thos b ministering to the flock . in which case the elder should be rejoicing that part#1 was doing exactly what ALL congregational parties should be doing .
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(footnote: parties #3 & #4 were SO WRONG to repeat that information to parties #1 ... but its suspected it was said to them in hope that it would get back to Party#1 - and it did .