• Welcome to Christianity Haven, thank you for visiting! If you have not already, we invite you to create an account and join in on the many discussions we have! 

    • Please be aware that when registering you must not register while using a VPN. Any registrations made using a VPN will be rejected.
    • Additionally, registration emails are not being sent out which is an issue that is being worked on. Your registration may go into an approval queue for admin approval. We work to send manual emails to the email on file, so please ensure the email you use is one you can readily access! 

Search results

  1. J

    What Did Jesus Shorten The Great Tribulation To?

    Daniel 9:24-27 is all about Jesus, not that nonsense you are assembling from the words of Paul. You follow Paul, I follow Jesus.
  2. J

    Mark 13:10

    lol and you want to be spoon fed. So you have evidence that John Mark wrote it? I'd be interested in seeing what has you believing it because I did my homework and found none.
  3. J

    Mark 13:10

    On the contrary. The evidence proves that Nicodemus, and eyewitness wrote Matthew, and that James the brother of John wrote Mark. There are three eyewitness testimonies proving Jesus as the Messiah and God in accordance with the Law of God specified in Deuteronomy.
  4. J

    Mark 13:10

    Nope, I gave you the process on how you can prove it for yourself. I did my homework, if you are that interested follow my steps and I will help you along the way. I'm not going to read you the sections in the Bible that address Nicodemus either. It has everything to do with Matthew. Matthew...
  5. J

    Mark 13:10

    It is questionable because John doesn't mention Matthew and the false teachers changed the name in a copied account. But let's say he is and you are trying to prove he's the author. When were those dated and how many years after they were written are those documents? A second century person...
  6. J

    Mark 13:10

    lol. So what portion of my analysis of Matthew 16 as it applied to the foundation of the Catholic Church did you disagree with and why?
  7. J

    Mark 13:10

    Spoken like a true Catholic--attack the messenger rather than the message. When I started my investigation I didn't know where it would lead, but as with all my investigations, I was out to find and report the truth. You may not like the truth, but I present my findings and YOU are...
  8. J

    The Holy Trinity and the Incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ

    It's only a weak part if proven wrong. I've been over the numbers numerous times. They add up, make sense, and I'm a math wiz and can't find anything wrong with them. I am pretty good at searching for and finding information that I need. I have not seen another analysis of the numbers of...
  9. J

    Crazy Christian Theology

    In the general scheme of things, this is all that matters and I am 100% with Jesus and stand with you. I've enjoyed your thoughtful questions and I know this is a very tough subject. I think I know why the Lord picked me to fight this battle because this has been my job in the public and...
  10. J

    Mark 13:10

    It is in the Bible, but how does that prove Matthew wrote the Gospel of Matthew? There is no evidence for it. You want some proof that Nicodemus wrote the Gospel start with the post I just explained to Bruce. It proves the author of Matthew copied from Mark then the foundation of the Catholic...
  11. J

    Mark 13:10

    I haven't been through all of Peter's mentions in Matthew and I don't expect all of them to be "Peter-promoting," but I went through several events and found a pattern. Nicodemus copied from the Gospel of Mark. All events will either have proof of copying or not. Those that do if they have...
  12. J

    Mark 13:10

  13. J

    Mark 13:10

    Like I said, if your interested you will find the directions on how to prove Nicodemus wrote the Gospel of Matthew in my posting. If you search for it and can't find it I will repost it for you. You gave no evidence of Matthew. A few vague words that counter many scholars.
  14. J

    Mark 13:10

    Of course you thoroughly reviewed why I concluded that and compared notes, otherwise you wouldn't be so confident. What part of my analysis do you disagree with? John said those they were turning the Church over too were false teachers (1 John 2:18-19). That about fits the timeframe for the...
  15. J

    Mark 13:10

    Everything seems ridiculous to a person who doesn't seek the truth. You seem convinced about Matthew. Feel free to present the evidence you have for Matthew so that I can also be convinced he was the author and reconsider my conclusions.
  16. J

    Mark 13:10

    Never said it was widely distributed after he wrote it. It is my conclusion based on the Gospel documentation that Nicodemus did write the Gospel of Matthew. Prophecy tells you the word of God will be corrupted, so I don't know that it really isn't a theory, it's considering what is written...
  17. J

    The end of the world

    Sorry, but I wasted enough time trying to address some of your theology this morning. We'll have to address it here. For starters, you've used the copied version of the account of the Olivet Discourse and there are certain words in the copy that weren't in the original written in the Gospel of...
  18. J

    The end of the world

    I went to that post this morning and spent an hour disagreeing with your theology based on your assumptions. It wouldn't let me post anything or even copy it. In summary, your theology is full of holes and I see you didn't address my comments earlier in this post. It's clear that Jesus, in...
  19. J

    The end of the world

    I agree. Every word of God is intentional and meaningful. Actually Matthew's author Nicodemus was not present for this discourse so he copied it from Marks author James,. who was there. So you are saying God provided end of time details so we would watch out not to be deceived? That makes no...
  20. J

    Crazy Christian Theology

    Jezebel was before the woman was introduced so never associated it with the woman. Babylon is representative of the church a# a whole—full of corruption. New Jerusalem is the eternal Kingdom after the old is destroyed. I thought I had found a huge church that I initially thought met Jesus...
Top Bottom