Search results

In the account of Daniel the 3 are called by their new names while tempered with a circumcision of the heart. In maccabees this basic hebrew tenet is entirely glossed over when the author claims that their hebrew names were in the kiln. Do you understand?

I said no such thing. ["Anyone recognize the first 3 names? I dont]"

Apply the same measure of scrutiny to the book of maccabees as you have my words . Blessings Always

Hebrews are very strict with accuracy. The book of maccabees fails a fundamental premise.

Context sir. I suppose you couldn't find what I asked

His body "Was" always immortal.

Leave the repetition aside please. What I see and believe is that intimacy is a beautiful reminder of the sanctity of marriage. In my opinion its against Torah when denying such to yosef and miriam. And teaching others to denigrate their (yosef and miriams) relationship to celibate partners is...

I'll concede if you can find a version of maccabees that states their other names.

I changed the of meaning virgin just as you changed the meaning of wife, husband, and brothers. Do you understand?

Lammchen clarified precisely what I stated. And I'm thankful for her witness. When conveying words in english letters/language. Perhaps there is an issue in translation software. Do speak and type in English?

True, They are not mentioned by those names when cast into the 7fold fired kiln. And there is a principle lesson in why their hebrew names are not mentioned in this very specific account. Something of which a Torah observant hebrew would understand. For the author of maccabees to make such a...

No. And please refrain from manipulating my words.

There is a distinction between Faith(trust) and Integrity in hebrew. כד בֵּאדַיִן מַלְכָּא, שַׂגִּיא טְאֵב עֲלוֹהִי, וּלְדָנִיֵּאל, אֲמַר לְהַנְסָקָה מִן-גֻּבָּא; וְהֻסַּק דָּנִיֵּאל מִן-גֻּבָּא, וְכָל-חֲבָל לָא-הִשְׁתְּכַח בֵּהּ--דִּי, הֵימִן בֵּאלָהֵהּ. 24 Then was the king exceeding glad...

Point being is that a Torah observant hebrew would of known not to make such a blatant mistake. ט בֵּאדַיִן נְבוּכַדְנֶצַּר הִתְמְלִי חֱמָא, וּצְלֵם אַנְפּוֹהִי אשתנו (אֶשְׁתַּנִּי), עַל-שַׁדְרַךְ מֵישַׁךְ, וַעֲבֵד נְגוֹ; עָנֵה וְאָמַר, לְמֵזֵא לְאַתּוּנָא, חַד-שִׁבְעָה, עַל דִּי חֲזֵה...

Another discrepancy is found in ch 2 of 1 maccabees that conflict with the writings of Daniel. [ 59 Hananiah, Azariah, and Mishael were saved from the flames because they had faith. 60 Daniel was a man of integrity, and the Lord rescued him from the mouth of the lions.] Anyone recognize the...

A very disturbing last sentence. Blasphemy far as I can see. 1 maccabees [ 59 On the twenty-fifth of the month, these same evil people offered sacrifices on the pagan altar erected on top of the altar in the Temple. 60 Mothers who had allowed their babies to be circumcised were put to death in...

Who is the "early church"? Sources please

Who do you assume told me to be "against" maccabees?

I haven't accused! A closer definition would be scrutinized or criticized. I do find relevant historical accounts while reading maccabees that closely relate to the miracle of oil. But as a whole. It is Lacking in veracity.

Exactly. If out of context it depends on what version of Roman's a person reads in order to glean the spiritual meaning. https://www.bibleref.com/Romans/2/Romans-2-25.html