Search results

How futile would that be? Yet all I show is Jesus refuting him.

For their rewards, not for Hell.

But you cannot understand the teaching unless you think like them. Americanised "Christianity" is in over its head thinking as they do.

So if he paid for all sins, including the sin of rejecting Him, Why the Judgement on the last day?

I have many proofs of Christ's deity found in scripture. I wonder how many of them you are aware of?

You say he died for everyone's sins. But all are not saved. No Judgement day if you are right, and we know this is not true.

Is it a matter of reading our faults into others and assuming their motives are the same as ours?

The debate problem stems from the Institutional churches that separate from the Church along the lines of the false doctrines they hold. Paul forbids it yet the debate swells. It's best just to avoid them.

But you must think like a Hebrew of the first century to understand it. Died for all who are saved. If he died for all as you say, ALL are saved.

No. I do not say a word. I point to two scriptures spoken by Jesus that prove universal free will atonement is wrong. And patiently wait for someone to refute his words.

But the truth remains, we need your scriptures that refute Jesus in Jn. 10. There is no debate here, just a desire to see you refute Jesus. It's Jesus doing all the talking, not me. I just point to what He says.

Try reading without distraction.

It seems Free Will universal atonement buffs promote most of this.

So the audience is not important when trying to understand it as they would? And then to criticize scholarship as a form of ignorance? Wow....

Who made up the audience in Hebrews? It was the Hebrews that knew salvation is only for the Jews. So who would be the ALL men the writer is referring to? Would it not be the Gentiles promised to Abraham? Americanised "Christianity" places all on the wrong foot every time.

Isn't it obvious we are not talking about Unitarian Universalism? But Arminian Universalism?

I avoid both Catholicism and Protestantism. But I've studied Protestant doctrines in depth weeding out the unscriptural component. When I got thrown off the Evangelical/Pentecostal bandwagon, I looked at the Reformation thinking that was the epitome of debate and refined truth. So I went as far...

“Then opened he their understanding, that they might understand the scriptures,” Luke 24:45 (KJV 1900) This is tricky. I found that God sometimes places me in situations that open the word to me. Not to be understood otherwise. It was a supernatural revelation of Limited Atonement, under the...

They were under the law and knew very little about the expected New Covenant. But the few born-agains among them were saved.

None can believe and repent but the elect from the ends of the earth. “All that the Father giveth me shall come to me; and him that cometh to me I will in no wise cast out.” John 6:37 (KJV 1900)