Search results

Never claimed I could. Could you please my questions. How does that change the vast majority Greek manuscript evidence? Should the Greek N.T. and our translations of the Greek N.T. be changed because of Cyprian a Latin source?

lol Again I ask: How does that change the vast majority Greek manuscript evidence? Should the Greek N.T. and our translations of the Greek N.T. be changed because of Cyprian a Latin source?

How does that change the vast majority Greek manuscript evidence? Should the Greek N.T. and our translations of the Greek N.T. be changed because of Cyprian a Latin source?

The Johannine Comma is NOT found in the vast majority of manuscripts. In fact of the ca. 490 manuscripts of 1 John 5, the Comma is found in only 10. These are: 629, 61, 429, 918, 2473, 2318, 177, 221, 88, 636 Of those 10 manuscripts, the Comma is found as a margin reading (not the body of the...

Hello and welcome

Hello and welcome

All four are translations of the Hebrew and Greek texts. It really depends on which translation method is being used. Formal-equivalence translations attempt to translate each word in the original language into an equivalent English word. Dynamic-equivalence translations attempt to translate...

Early in her career she did a cover of Bob Dylan's "If Not for You" which I like very much.

Yes, I was a Boy Scout, and I am an Army veteran.

Hello and welcome

What they said!

Hair

Bercot list common mistakes made by readers. This is number one on his list (p. xii). The last sentence is very telling giving what is being claimed concerning the beliefs of the early church.

That is an excellent point. I could not agree more. Messianism was a major reoccurring theme in the second temple period literature. Take this example from the Testament of Judah 24:1-6. "And after these things a star will arise to you from Jacob in peace, and a man will arise from my seed...

The above claim, like so many others made by Nathan, makes zero sense and is clearly false. First, I NEVER claimed Peter quotes Deuteronomy word for word or that a word for word quote was necessary. Second, in fact I emphatically state that Peter did NOT quote Deuteronomy word for word. Third...

For you, no doubt. Then by all means produce Jude's copy of Enoch (or any copy of Enoch for that matter) which is word for word just like Jude's quotation so that others make check the veracity of your claim.

There is no double standard concerning your claim. You were very clear about it. Here is your statement word for word, verbatim. Your post is nothing more than inadequate attempt to change the subject away from your demonstrably and utterly false claim.

I know exactly what my point is. The point is you made a claim. This is the claim you made. That claim is demonstrably and utterly false. Now you want to back peddle on your initial claim for very obvious reasons.