Search results

If he said it? Read the thread before commenting. He is not right, but I'm not getting into a back and forth about what the Bible plainly says. It never says 42 generations in the text. You have to multiply 14x3 to arrive at 42. So the Bible says 14 generations in three lists, not 42 in three...

He said it literally said 42 generations. It doesn't. I did say how one would arrive at the sum of 42, but that doesn't mean Scripture literally says there's 42 generations. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

I use both Brave and DuckDuckGo as my browsers and haven't seen any ads since. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

I'd have to see the whole post for context, but if I had to guess, I would say what that person means is that there isn't any issue serious enough to leave the local church body over. I disagree with that mindset. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

So we don't have to quote Scripture accurately? We can just insert things that aren't there? We can say God said things He never said? That's a dangerous practice. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Still waiting for proof I said people lived for thousands or millions of years. It literally does not mention 42 generations. See for yourself. This is from Matthew 1: 17] So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations; from David to the deportation to Babylon, fourteen...

Show me where I claimed that they did. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Yeah, I've seen that number too. There's just no concensus among a group who believe the geneaologies are clear and definitive. It doesn't make sense. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

When I served on the council there were no women and they also can't vote. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

So you align more with the Protestant teaching that the Lord's Supper is symbolic only, doesn't deliver forgiveness of sin to the believer, and is an act that you do for God to show how faithful you are? Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

It's always been my understanding that the geneaologies in Genesis were written as a record of Jesus' bloodline. They are not proof of the age of the earth. Young Earthers can't even agree on how young Earth is, I've seen people say 6,000 years, I've seen others say 20,000 years. If it's so...

Has he proven the earth is six thousand years old using Scripture? He shouldn't teach a doctrine that has no Scriptural support. I wouldn't suggest going back to the RCC because of the age of the earth and micro-evolution. Now, if you had a crisis of faith over how we are justified or believed...

Sit down with your current pastor and ask him to prove the earth is 6,000 years old. I'm a Lutheran and I've never heard this taught in my church. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

"FWIW, I don't care for the continual attempt to sideline the discussion like that, but the idea that wearing a crucifix rather than a cross minus corpus will surely signal that the wearer is a Christian whereas wearing a cross doesn't do that is just ridiculous." It isn't ridiculous when it's...

That statement wasn't even close to saying people are being forced to do wear a bare cross. It was an expansion upon what you said in an earlier post that touched on intention VS. perception. There's a reason behind what you do and there's a reaction to what you have chosen to do. The bare...

I didn't say they were being forced. So I'll forgive your misunderstanding there, and move on. You make the choice to wear the bare cross of your own free will. Not only are you going along with the secular world, you are most likely doing so because that's too Catholic. [emoji23] Sent from my...

Then that person is grossly misinformed. The crucifix, not just for Roman Catholics anymore. There is only one cross that matters, the one Jesus died upon. Any Christian who won't display that is bending to the secular world by being like them. A lot of people wear the cross as jewelry, not...

The KIA Hamsters Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

Crucifix. It's a more visual reminder of the price Christ paid for my sins. Sent from my SM-G991U using Tapatalk

I don't mind time jumps if you let the viewer know which time period you're in. Also, they didn't need it in this show. They could have easily covered the past in an episode or two and spent the rest of the time in the present. It gets a little better towards the end and I believe Netflix has...