Search results

Whether Tobit is or is not teaching sorcery and therefore endorsing sin, that’s involved in Christian Theology. Put it in whatever category you like. I think I’ve made my case that medicine is not magic.

It’s about whether or not Tobit is teaching magic (or sorcery)

“Afterward they traveled on together till they were near Media. The boy asked the angel this question: ‘Brother Azariah, what medicinal value is there in the fish's heart, liver, and gall?’ “ -Tobit 6:7 (NAB) “as for the gall, if you rub it on the eyes of a man who has cataracts, blowing into...

Because people say the book of Tobit is “teaching magic” for saying that they used fish guts to heal cataracts. I’m showing that it’s legitimate useful medicine, just like Tobit says.

Have you heard of Lanomax? https://www.lanomax.com/ Lanomax is an eye drop invented by medical professionals and scientists. It is being tested out on animals such as dogs and rabbits. It clears away cataracts in their eyes. Cataracts are like a white film that covers their eye and prevents...

You think I'm obsessed with the Apocrypha. But I'm not. I've probably been much more obsessed with the 2000 Mules election fraud issue. I've been listening to Dinesh D'Souza's podcast every day. That's what I'm obsessed with at the moment.

Why are shekels of silver involved in the trespass offering? “If a person commits a trespass, and sins unintentionally in regard to the holy things of the Lord, then he shall bring to the Lord as his trespass offering a ram without blemish from the flocks, with your valuation in shekels of...

Exodus 30 says that money makes atonement. "The rich shall not give more and the poor shall not give less than half a shekel, when you give an offering to the Lord, to make atonement for yourselves. And you shall take the atonement money of the children of Israel, and shall appoint it for the...

I definitely don’t see a huge contradiction. That’s for sure.

“Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? Of works? No, but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith apart from the deeds of the law.” -Romans 3:27-28 “just as David also describes the blessedness of the man to whom God imputes righteousness apart...

Daniel says to break off your sins by being righteous and showing mercy to be poor. Tobit says the same thing. There’s no difference.

The book of Daniel does. “Therefore, O king, let my advice be acceptable to you; break off your sins by being righteous, and your iniquities by showing mercy to the poor. Perhaps there may be a lengthening of your prosperity.” -Daniel 4:27...

Tobit lived in Old Testament times. Can’t condemn him for wanting to follow the law of Moses.

When Paul says “not by works” he’s talking about obeying Old Testament law. The Old Testament clearly commands to obey Old Testament law. “Behold, all souls are Mine; The soul of the father As well as the soul of the son is Mine; The soul who sins shall die. But if a man is just And does what...

So? Tobit was an Old Testament Israelite. He wanted to keep all the law. What’s so surprising about that?

People say that Tobit teaches a works salvation. Then they quote Ephesians which says that we're "saved by faith and not by works lest any man should boast." However, when Paul said "Not by works" he was talking about the Old Testament Jewish ceremonial laws, like circumcision, dietary laws...

2000 Mules

Here’s Steven Anderson saying the Apocrypha is trash:

Here’s bible teachers saying the Apocrypha is good to read. But there’s still people out there who think it’s Satanic.

Here’s another one.