Search results

I remember reading somewhere about a similar situation where a certain godly person was accused of commanding demons. How did that go again? [emoji6] Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

You would probably be more blessed if you took the time to study another language. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Don't worry, I reported him to the mods. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Some would suggest your hostile bigotry towards others is demonic. You really need to tone it down. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

MenneSota, why are you so angry and hostile to anyone with a different belief than yours? It isn't natural. It almost seems like you enjoy arguing with other people. Borderline Westborough Baptist Church. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Perhaps I am confused. I am having trouble remembering what you are referencing. Can you tell me which post we are talking about? Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Or you can be a Calvinist who defines tolerance as "accepting someone right to be wrong". [emoji3] Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Because more often than not, there isn't a definitive right or wrong answer. Only possibilities to choose from. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

I don't think you understand the point I was making. If there wasn't so much grey why are there so many denominations and which one is right? Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Sounds about right. Any good commentary will not simply tell you "the right answer". Rather they will give all the possible answers and explain the pros and cons for each. Allowing you to make an informed decision for yourself. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

I don't think anyone here is suggesting this. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. 1 Corinthians 14:33 KJV However: Come, let us go down and confuse their language so they will not understand each other.” Genesis 11:7 NIV Not trying to argue. Just food for thought to emphasize the...

Have you tried looking in a reputable commentary? Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Agreed. After going to seminary I soon realized that theology has a lot of grey. There is very rarely a right or a wrong answer. Only possible answers, each as valid as the other. Which is why systematic theology, hermeneutics, and apologetics are so important. Unfortunately, these topics are...

The NIV is a little more clear. If you see any brother or sister commit a sin that does not lead to death, you should pray and God will give them life. I refer to those whose sin does not lead to death. There is a sin that leads to death. I am not saying that you should pray about that. 1 John...

You are confused. I don't believe in universal salvation. Rather, I don't believe in limited atonement nor dual-predestination. Meaning that everyone has the opportunity to be saved. However, many choose not to take that opportunity. Jesus died for everyone. All means all. Not just the elect...

Darn, you beat me to it. It probably won't matter. Ten posts from now MenneSota will probably claim again that we are not reading our Bibles. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

1 Tim 2:4, 2 Peter 3:9, John 3:16, John 1:29, Romans 11:32, 1 John 2:2 suggests that God desires that all are saved and rejects limited atonement. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Your position is a very valid and respectable position to have. Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Basically, in regards to predestination, there are two schools of thought. Single-predestination (S)and Double-predestination (D). S basically is the belief that everyone is deserving Hell. However, God only predestined those elected to be saved. It would be like as if a hundred people were...