Search results

I skipped breakfast today and lunch was quite light. Just some ham and a wrap with a bit of tomato. It was tasty and refreshing.

If one's beliefs ultimately rest on some internal experience that one associates with the Holy Spirit then isn't one's faith subjective and hence not really transmissible or defensible except by making an appeal to one's feelings as the foundation for faith?

Tuesday, 28th July 2015 Morning Walk in love. Eph. 5:2 A new commandment I give unto you, That ye love one another; as I have loved you, that ye also love one another. John 13:34 Above all things have fervent charity among yourselves: for charity shall cover the multitude of sins. I Pet...

A dogma of the faith is binding only on those who are in full communion with the Catholic Church. Lutherans are not in full communion with the Catholic Church so nobody is asking you to be bound by Catholic dogma as long as you remain Lutheran. Mind you, since dogmas are true the truth of them...

I suspect that is why they are Lutherans. Catholics are not asking Lutherans to accept any dogma of the faith that they do not want to accept. But let's stick to the four dogmas that this thread is about. And remember that this is the Catholic subforum. It isn't the appropriate place for the...

it was yummy :)

If what is passed as 'tongues' in today's Chrismatic meetings were a real language and not gibberish then somebody who knows the language could translate it but the stuff that is uttered is not translatable so it isn't a language.

Well, your post seems to be assuming a whole lot that simply is not the truth.

My PC uses Windows 7, my tablet uses Android 4.2.2 (or something like that), my netbook uses Windows XP, and my phone uses Android 5.0.2 ... quite a lot of operating systems but all are fairly easy to use.

I have a PC and a netbook and a tablet and a smart phone (smart phones are kind of evil).

Yes, smart phones.

Lunch was good. We had Shepherd's pie Quiche Sausages and rolls And some coffee with a vanilla and butter cake

So you can agree with only one dogma about Mary; specifically that she is the mother of the Lord (mother of God). Yet you say you agree with the perpetual virginity of the Blessed Virgin Mary and you seem accepting of the assumption of Mary. That looks like two or three dogmas :)

Since your reply didn't address any of the points raised in my post I wonder what purpose your reply is intended to serve?

Monday, 27th July 2015 Morning Christ, who is the image of God. II Cor. 4:4 The glory of the LORD shall be revealed, and all flesh shall see it together. Isa. 40:5 No man hath seen God at any time; the only begotten Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, he hath declared him. And the...

I use MS Security Essentials ... and Malwarebytes ... they do a good job.

You are welcome. It is worth remembering that Enoch was assumed into heaven without having died and that the same appears to be true of Elijah.

Well, since the dogmatic definition says “We pronounce, declare and define it to be a divinely revealed dogma that the immaculate Mother of God, the ever Virgin Mary, having completed the course of her earthly life, was assumed body and soul to heavenly glory.” I do not see the difficulty...

Hello CF :) May God grant you a pleasant stay here and welcome to Christian Haven.

Good. :)