Recent content by kiwimac

Twaddle. Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk

Still twaddle.

Really, from my point of view, this is very simple: No 10-year-old child should be expected to carry a pregnancy to It's end. Especially a pregnancy which has been started by an act of violence: the child's body is not ready for the strain, it is a very bad idea psychologically for the child and...

Twaddle. Most abortions occur while it is indeed a clump of cells. If you can't deal with that that's your problem not mine. Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk

Twaddle. But what I've come to expect! A clump of cells vs a fully grown, functioning woman. You and yours can rack off. I shake the dust from my sandals at you. Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk

"Abortion Industry" hmm. A person can have an abortion for a number of reasons, none of which need bother you unless you are the one having the abortion. It simply is not your business. We have no rights ,as Christians, to deal with humans from any other place than the ones we are commanded...

There are words for what you've written here. None of which I can mention here. It is, frankly, [staff edit]. Until a ZEF has made it through the vicissitudes of gestation it remains a potential. As for the "sucking it's thumb" nonsense most abortions take place long before there is a thumb to...

Response to #34 FIRST: SCIENCE. A ZEF is a potential human being, in the same way that an acorn is a potential oak tree. Put another way, they are 'foetuses' that will, in time and all things being equal will become a human / Oak tree. And THAT is the science of the matter. SECOND: NOT...

Twaddle. I will reply when I've had some sleep but your argument is heiferdust. Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk

It is long overdue for America to grow up. It is no one's business whether another person has or does not have an abortion. And the prurient interest you have about what others do sexually is seriously creepy. Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk

We will see, I have little hope in the sensibility of the members of SCOTUS.

Page 119 of the decision indicates that Clarence Thomas, at least, believes that "... Thomas wrote, was the right for married couples to buy and use contraception without government restriction, from the landmark 1965 ruling in Griswold v. Connecticut. “In future cases, we should reconsider all...

Shall I quote from the Scotus decision? Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk

Scotus has already mentioned it wants to look at both contraception and Gay marriage. I think you (plural) simply do not care that others will suffer. Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk

Not at all. This has made it much harder for women to access abortion services and is likely to lead to many more maternal deaths. Sent from my ELE-L09 using Tapatalk