Yes it is true much to your amazement I am sure, now quit with all your disparagement of brace men and women
Try going to the site of the twin towers, get to know someone who went through it and then say it wasnt real.
You aren't aware of what I believe, psalms. What is undeniably real is that 3 buildings fell that day (2 that we were shown over and over and over and over), and one (WTC7) that we weren't shown over and over(incidentally, also wasn't said to have been hit by a plane). I'm sure some people were hurt/killed - and I'm sure there were firefighters/police that may have/did lose their lives.
I don't believe I have ever argued those points, but I haven't been specific in what I don't believe. So here are a few examples.
1) Planes DID NOT hit the buildings. No, it is not possible that what we were shown on "live TV" is the truth. Why? Because while a fighter plane can fly at the speeds shown/reported at the low altitude required to hit the towers, a large passenger airline such as a 767 cannot. That type of jet simply cannot do it due to the amount of air density at those altitudes. They are not built to fly at those speeds at those altitudes, but at 20,000 feet - they cannot even approach the speeds shown at those altitudes without breaking up and tearing apart!
But the major media isn't counting on most people knowing this.
2) Many of the victims are photo-shopped and a lot of mistakes were made on the "remembrance" sites hosted by the likes of CNN. The people involved in posting those photos made a lot of mistakes - and when it was pointed out on the internet - all of a sudden those photos started disappearing from those sites.
Why create victims? Because the amount of real victims is likely to be far far less than what were told. 3,000 families grieving from the loss of loved ones (what, maybe 9-12k people NOT including their extended relatives) is a greater force to be reckoned with - a force the powers that orchestrated this are not likely to want to reckon with. Not to mention most of the victims aren't even on the Social Security Death Index. That's important. I found my grandfather on that index and although he was an American Citizen, he did not die in the USA- he died in Holland after living there for quite a few years.
3) The various angle shots of the planes are inconsistent with each other - that is to say - one shot will show a plane "dive bombing" from above in a short distance to hit a tower - while another shot shows the same plane going perfectly straight over the same distance. The logical conclusion is that one or both of the shots must be faked.
4) In some videos sounds of an explosion after plane impact can be heard far before it should be heard from the distance of the camera to the distance of the building. Either it was dubbed in or we throw some physics out the window.
5) A small army of engineers, airline pilots, experts in demolition and others in related fields have created multiple websites and documentaries putting their reputations as professionals on the line - all to educate the public on the monstrosity of the official version - why the buildings are supposed to have fallen, how it is possible that they did in the way they did, how those kinds of planes cannot fly at those altitudes, and even the difficulty of manually directing them the towers even if they could - so on and so forth.
The information is out there - you just have to look, and be open to reason.
ray: