My Choice for President

[MS140ukn]

i will vote for clinton too.. forget about the email controversy..she has a level headed approach to tackling issues better than trump. he has an aggressive "gung-ho" attitude..he would not hesitate to go to WWlll if needs be..while clinton would find a more neutral solution. trump can go back to his casinos.

 

[psalms 91]

Yes, I will vote Clinton as well

 

[Highlander]

i will vote for clinton too.. forget about the email controversy..she has a level headed approach to tackling issues better than trump. he has an aggressive "gung-ho" attitude..he would not hesitate to go to WWlll if needs be..while clinton would find a more neutral solution. trump can go back to his casinos.

Are you talking about the same Hillary who left our men to die on the battlefield in Bengazhi?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who illegally confiscated over 900 FBI files on her political opponents to use against them?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who stalled for several years from surrendering the Rose Law Firm records that would incriminate her by claiming she could not find them?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who finally DID "find them" after the statute of limitations expired and they suddenly "appeared" on her coffee table?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who claimed she had never seen those records, didn't know how they "appeared" on her coffee table?
Are you talking about the same Hillary whose fingerprints were found on those records on the coffee table?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who personally destroyed every woman who had an affair with her husband so that they could harm their political agenda?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who stated that a woman must be believed when claiming a sexual assault?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who intimidated Juanita Brodderick into silence after she reported that she had been raped in a hotel room by Bill Clinton?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who, along with Obama, virtually CREATED ISIS by abandoning/reversing our victory in Iraq?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who has promised to give us "Obama's" THIRD term as she would continue on with his policies that have brought America to its knees?

Nah, you must be talking about some other person named Clinton. Perhaps Roger or Chelsea???

 

[MoreCoffee]

Whoever is chosen in the November 2016 presidential election will be chosen by the majority of voters who turn out to vote on that day. Christians ought to pray for a good and godly outcome. Providentially the one whom God intends to be president will become president. But I urge prayer that whoever becomes president will be a good president who serves the needs and aspirations of the nation faithfully and well.

 

[MoreCoffee]

Hillary is pro Muslim. I don't want any more venturing into Muslim religous politics in our land. She will bring in Sharia Law and more Muslim immigrants.. yeeesh.. Can I vote for Ted Cruz or Gowdy?

After reading this post I wish there was a "dislike" button.

 

[MarkFL]

Yes, I will vote Clinton as well

Yes, I will too. A vote for Clinton will do more to keep Trump from winning than a write-in vote could do. A loose cannon like Trump in the Oval Office is the last thing the world needs.

 

[psalms 91]

Yes, I will too. A vote for Clinton will do more to keep Trump from winning than a write-in vote could do. A loose cannon like Trump in the Oval Office is the last thing the world needs.

Totally agree

 

[tango]

Yes, I will too. A vote for Clinton will do more to keep Trump from winning than a write-in vote could do. A loose cannon like Trump in the Oval Office is the last thing the world needs.

Not that I get a vote but of the two I'd prefer Donald. Honestly I think Hillary represents just about everything that is wrong with Washington. Although Donald's main attraction is they he isn't Hillary.

I'd rather have Donald, but in the same way I'd rather have a broken leg than a heart attack.

 

[Josiah]

I cannot vote for anyone who passionately supports the murder of innocent, defenseless babies in abortion-on-demand: well over one million murders every year just in the USA. Can 't do it. I would NOT have voted for any candidate before 1865 who actively, passionately supported slavery, and I will not vote for any today who actively, passionately supports abortion.

Plus.... I think Hillary is a liar who makes Nixon and her husband look innocent..... and I think it's unwise to have a president who has been officially declared an extremely poor security risk. And ... I have a hard time forgiving her for throwing Monica under the bus as a victim of sexual abuse simply to protect the political future of her husband and herself... I think it reveals WELL how she views women and how she'll throw any under the bus to advance her own power. I can't see how ANYONE (especially women) can have any respect for her at all. Not that The Donald is necessary better - but that's why I'm voting for Ronald Reagan. IF I was FORCED to vote for one or the other, I'd go with Trump on the pro-life issue alone and because there will be Supreme Court appointments during the next 4 years (one is already pending).



- Josiah




.

 

[Lamb]

Yes, I will too. A vote for Clinton will do more to keep Trump from winning than a write-in vote could do. A loose cannon like Trump in the Oval Office is the last thing the world needs.

Loose cannon! I think I prefer that actually LOL

Which one would terrorize the terrorists the most? It's gotta be Trump!

 

[MarkFL]

Yes, look how effective the trillions of dollars we have sunk into the so-called war on terror has been. I'd like to see more attention focused on domestic affairs, rather than trying to police the world (and look how the world loves us for it). Think of all the money wasted on putting boots on foreign soil, and what effect that could have had on education. But, I digress.

 

[Josiah]

Are you talking about the same Hillary who stated that a woman must be believed when claiming a sexual assault?

She threw Monica under the bus..... showing women are lairs and female sexual victims are never to be believed (if it could hurt the political power of one with "Clinton" as a last name)


Oh, and you forgot some:

Are you talking about the same Hillary who was officially declared to be an extremely bad security risk (and therefore is disqualified to be president)?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who said she needed her own email account because she only can use one phone... then admitted she has 4?
Are you talking about the same Hillary who said under oath she never sent top secret stuff then was proven she did?





.

 

[tango]

Loose cannon! I think I prefer that actually LOL

Which one would terrorize the terrorists the most? It's gotta be Trump!

Whatever Trump's shortcomings (and there's no point pretending he's a saint) I think Hillary has shown such an appalling lack of judgment to date that I struggle to see how anyone can take her seriously. I think the only thing she has going for her is the fact she isn't Donald Trump. If you or I did what she did with her email we'd be subject to a federal investigation so intrusive we'd struggle to run a whelk stall let alone a presidential campaign. Then when the FBI director said that it was clear she had broken the law it should really have ended her candidacy right there, but of course the "no prosecution" line effectively provided all the ammunition needed for the people to claim it was a non-issue.

Seriously, a presidential candidate demonstrates a total lack of honor and integrity regarding the rules and national security and people still think she's fit to be president?

I really don't think a loose cannon like Trump would be a good thing to have in the Oval Office, but frankly if the alternative is Hillary I'd rather see a turnip in office. Although thinking about it, maybe a turnip would be better than either of the mainstream candidates.

Oh to have a "none of the above" option that would invalidate the whole election, disqualify the candidates from standing again, and reopen the field for a new election.

 

[MarkFL]

...Oh to have a "none of the above" option that would invalidate the whole election, disqualify the candidates from standing again, and reopen the field for a new election.

Yes, that would be great! I think, at least going by the people I know, that would win by a landslide.

I certainly don't want Clinton in office, it's just that I want Trump in office even less. It's a real shame that we don't have anyone on the ticket that's not such a bad choice. Your analogy of a broken leg vs. a heart attack is a good one.

 

[tango]

Yes, that would be great! I think, at least going by the people I know, that would win by a landslide.

I certainly don't want Clinton in office, it's just that I want Trump in office even less. It's a real shame that we don't have anyone on the ticket that's not such a bad choice. Your analogy of a broken leg vs. a heart attack is a good one.

Seems like my stance but the other way around. I don't want Trump in office, I'd just rather have him than Clinton.

As was said over the water during the 2000 Gush/Bore election - the country has 250,000,000 people, surely it can find better candidates than these two?

 

[MoreCoffee]

With regard to presidential candidates in the USA presidential elections due later this year. It is worth remembering that there are seven things that Jehovah hates and it appears that chief among them is "he who sows dissent among the brethren". Surely the disputes between worldly political parties ought not cause dissent among the brethren because worldly politics will come to an end in time and has no place in eternity. There is no Republican heaven nor a Democrat heaven just the Kingdom of God which is neither a republic nor democratic.

 

[MoreCoffee]

This is chuckle worthy

 

[MarkFL]

LOL! The stuffed weasel named "Caligula" was quite appropriate!

I love his last protest to the security person pushing him away from the podium too. :rofl3:

 

[tango]

With regard to presidential candidates in the USA presidential elections due later this year. It is worth remembering that there are seven things that Jehovah hates and it appears that chief among them is "he who sows dissent among the brethren". Surely the disputes between worldly political parties ought not cause dissent among the brethren because worldly politics will come to an end in time and has no place in eternity. There is no Republican heaven nor a Democrat heaven just the Kingdom of God which is neither a republic nor democratic.

We should avoid dissent but as long as we can disagree on issues while still respecting the fact that other people have different viewpoints I think we're good. Having different opinions isn't a problem, it just becomes a problem when people start assuming that someone else isn't a proper Christian (whatever form of words they use) because they voted a certain way.

In some ways this coming election could be hugely polarising but it could be refreshingly honest. As far as I can see the primary thing that Donald Trump offers is that he's not Hillary Clinton and the primary thing that Hillary Clinton offers is that she's not Donald Trump. If people can agree that both candidates are dismal and it's just a question of which is the lesser evil it might, just might, short-circuit some of the polarisation associated with the concept that my candidate is all but the Messiah reborn and your candidate is all but the antichrist incarnate.

 

[MarkFL]

Those are some mighty words of wisdom there. :thumbsup: