• Welcome to Christianity Haven, thank you for visiting! If you have not already, we invite you to create an account and join in on the many discussions we have! 

    • Please be aware that when registering you must not register while using a VPN. Any registrations made using a VPN will be rejected.
    • Additionally, registration emails are not being sent out which is an issue that is being worked on. Your registration may go into an approval queue for admin approval. We work to send manual emails to the email on file, so please ensure the email you use is one you can readily access! 

What do you think the cup used at the Last Supper was made from?

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,376
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
What do you think the cup used at the Last Supper was made from?

Could it be wood, pottery, bronze, silver, gold, stone. a mix of some of these?
 

Frankj

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2024
Messages
923
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Non-Denominational
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I imagine it was whatever was in common use and meant for the general public daily life, probably wood or pottery.

I doubt it would be anything particularly decorative, what would archeological finds from sites of that era indicate?
 

NewCreation435

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
5,190
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
since scripture doesn't tell us then it would be impossible to say
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,376
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
since scripture doesn't tell us then it would be impossible to say
I agree that we do not KNOW of what material the cup was made, but surely, we can use reason and history to arrive at possible materials and to exclude impossible ones.
 

tango

... and you shall live ...
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
15,341
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
We can speculate but will probably never know for sure. Does it even matter?
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,376
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
We can speculate but will probably never know for sure. Does it even matter?
The cup is part of the gospel story, and a very significant part at that. But the material from which it was made is not made specific in the story. So yes, it matters, and no it is not "essential", but for my part I prefer a non-minimalist approach.
 

NewCreation435

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
5,190
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
We can speculate but will probably never know for sure. Does it even matter?
No, it doesn't. If it did then scripture would tell us
 

tango

... and you shall live ...
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
15,341
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The cup is part of the gospel story, and a very significant part at that. But the material from which it was made is not made specific in the story. So yes, it matters, and no it is not "essential", but for my part I prefer a non-minimalist approach.

The cup is a part of the story but I'm not sure why the composition of the cup matters. As NewCreation said, if it was important we might expect it to be written down. Does it matter what the plates were made of, what wood the table was made of, how thick the cloth of their clothes was, whether their hair was parted on the left or the right? At what point do we conclude that the event matters but many of the fine details do not?
 

BruceLeiter

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 11, 2024
Messages
853
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Widow/Widower
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The Bible doesn't say, I don't care, and it doesn't matter in the way the Bible presents the truth.
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,376
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
The Bible doesn't say, I don't care, and it doesn't matter in the way the Bible presents the truth.
you seem so sure of your opinion.
 

tango

... and you shall live ...
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
15,341
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,376
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
If it mattered don't you think at least one of the gospel writers would have written it down?
no.

I say no because the gospels do not tell us from what material tables, boats, or clothing were made nevertheless it is understood that boats were made from wood, tables from wood most of the time, clothing from wool or other natural fibres available in that time. So, history and archeology can tell us from what material a cup for use in a Passover meal in the upper room would most likely be made.

Here’s a clear, historically grounded picture of what cups at a first‑century Jewish Passover meal were likely made of, drawing on what we know from archaeology, Jewish purity law, and the social context of the period.

🏺 Materials Used for Cups in First‑Century Jewish Passover Meals​

Archaeology and rabbinic sources give us a surprisingly rich picture of everyday and ritual vessels in Second Temple Judaism. While none of the search results directly list cup materials, they do emphasize that ritual vessels were expected to be made of pure or noble materials, which aligns with what we know from broader scholarship.

🍶 1. Stone (Especially Limestone)​

Most characteristic of Jewish ritual life in the period.
  • Stone vessels were widely used because they were considered incapable of contracting ritual impurity under Jewish law.
  • Archaeological finds from Jerusalem and Galilee include stone cups, mugs, and goblets.
  • Wealthier households often used carved limestone goblets for festival meals.

🏺 2. Pottery (Ceramic)​

Common, inexpensive, and widely available.
  • Everyday cups were often ceramic.
  • However, pottery could become ritually impure and could not be purified, so some households avoided pottery for sacred meals like Passover.
  • Poorer families—explicitly mentioned in the Mishnah as still being provided with four cups of wine—likely used ceramic cups if stone was unavailable.

🥛 3. Glass​

Becoming more common in the first century.
  • Glass production expanded in the late Hellenistic and early Roman periods.
  • Glass vessels were considered less prestigious than metal but more refined than pottery.
  • Some rabbinic discussions treat glass similarly to pottery for purity purposes, but it was still used for drinking vessels.

🥇 4. Metal (Bronze, Copper, Silver)​

Used by wealthier households or for special occasions.
  • Bronze and copper cups were common in Greco‑Roman dining culture and present in Judea.
  • Silver cups appear in elite contexts.
  • Metal vessels could be purified, making them suitable for festival use.

🌿 5. Wood​

Less common for cups but not impossible.
  • Wooden bowls and ladles are attested, though wooden cups are rarer.
  • Wood could contract impurity but was still used in poorer households.

🧭 Putting It Together: What Would a Passover Table Look Like?​

A typical first‑century Passover meal might include:
  • Stone cups in households concerned with purity (very common in Judea).
  • Ceramic cups in poorer homes or rural areas.
  • Glass or metal cups in wealthier or urban households.
  • Silver cups only for the elite.
The Mishnah’s insistence that even the poorest person must receive four cups of wine implies that the material of the cup was flexible—ritual obligation rested on the wine, not the vessel.
 
Last edited:

tango

... and you shall live ...
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
15,341
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
All this is great, but you still didn't address why it matters what the cup was made of.

Maybe boats were made of wood. What difference does it make? If it was common for cups to be made of stone does that mean this specific cup must have been made of stone? It might have been made of something else entirely. It isn't written down, so we can't be sure.

Nowadays most wine glasses are made of, well, glass. But I have a set that are made from agate. An unusual set that I picked up because they caught my eye. If someone wrote down a load of details about my life, including the time my wife and I had our daughter for dinner and we drank wine, you'd be entirely reasonable in assuming that we drank the wine from vessels made of glass. But we didn't, we used the unusual set for no reason other than that we felt like it. So your assumption would be entirely reasonable, but still wrong.
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
34,524
Age
59
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
What do you think the cup used at the Last Supper was made from?

Could it be wood, pottery, bronze, silver, gold, stone. a mix of some of these?

Jesus, born poor, probably used materials that were also for the poor, is my opinion. Whether that's wood, pottery or stone, I'm not sure, but I think metal might have been costly?
 

MoreCoffee

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
19,376
Location
Western Australia
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Jesus, born poor, probably used materials that were also for the poor, is my opinion. Whether that's wood, pottery or stone, I'm not sure, but I think metal might have been costly?
The upper room that he and the disciples used for the last supper seems to be the same upper room mentioned in the account of Pentecost, and if that is so then it was a large room probably in the house of a well-off person perhaps one of the wealthy women who was a disciple of the Lord.

Here’s a clear, historically grounded synthesis of what scholars know—and what remains uncertain—about the Upper Room (also called the Cenacle) associated with Jesus and the disciples at the Last Supper. I’ll weave together the strongest evidence from archaeology, textual history, and tradition, drawing on the sources you triggered in search.


🕍 The Upper Room: What History Can Actually Tell Us

📍 1. Location and Identification

The traditional site of the Upper Room is on Mount Zion, just outside Jerusalem’s Old City walls. This site has been venerated since at least the 4th century CE, when early Christian pilgrims began identifying it as the place of the Last Supper.

The building known today as the Cenacle sits above a space long associated—incorrectly but persistently—with the Tomb of David. This layered religious significance (Christian, Jewish, Muslim) has shaped the building’s history and architecture over centuries.


🧱 2. What the Current Structure Actually Is

The room you can visit today is not the original first‑century room.

Instead, the present structure is:
  • A medieval Crusader-era hall, likely built in the 12th–14th centuries
  • Constructed in Gothic style, with ribbed vaults and pointed arches
  • Built atop earlier Byzantine and possibly Roman-period layers
Archaeologists have identified over 40 medieval inscriptions and graffiti carved into the walls—some by notable pilgrims—attesting to its long devotional use.

So: the tradition is ancient, but the building is medieval.


📜 3. Biblical and Early Christian Evidence

The New Testament describes the Last Supper as taking place in a large upstairs room (Greek: anagaion, hyperōion) prepared for Jesus and the disciples (e.g., Luke 22:12).

The same location is also associated with:
  • Post‑resurrection gatherings
  • The selection of Matthias to replace Judas
  • Pentecost, where the Holy Spirit descends on the apostles (Acts 1–2)
Early Christian tradition strongly links all these events to a single Jerusalem house owned by followers of Jesus—possibly the family of John Mark, though this is not provable.


🏺 4. Archaeological Layers Beneath the Cenacle

While excavation is limited (the site is politically and religiously sensitive), scholars have identified:
  • Byzantine foundations (4th–6th century)
  • Possible remains of a first‑century Jewish-Christian meeting place
  • A long history of rebuilding after earthquakes, conquests, and fires
The layering suggests continuous veneration of the site from late antiquity onward, even if the exact first‑century room cannot be archaeologically confirmed.


🧭 5. Why the Site Became the “Official” Upper Room

By the 4th century, Christian pilgrims were already being shown this location as the site of the Last Supper. This early attestation is significant: it places the tradition within living memory of the earliest church buildings in Jerusalem.

Reasons the site became fixed in tradition:
  • It was located in the early Christian quarter on Mount Zion
  • It was associated with the first Christian synagogue-church (the “Church of the Apostles”)
  • Pilgrims consistently reported it as the authentic site
  • Byzantine and Crusader authorities built churches around it
Even if the exact room cannot be proven, the continuity of memory is unusually strong for a Jerusalem holy site.



🕯️ 6. The Cenacle’s Multi‑Religious History

The building has served many identities:

PeriodUse
1st centuryPossible private home of early disciples (traditional)
4th–6th centuryByzantine church complex
12th–14th centuryCrusader chapel (basis of current room)
Ottoman periodConverted into a mosque; Arabic inscriptions added
Modern eraAdministered by Israeli authorities; shared pilgrimage site

This layered history explains the unusual mix of architectural and religious features.


🧩 7. What We Can Say With Confidence

Historically solid:
  • The Last Supper took place in an upper room in Jerusalem.
  • Early Christians venerated a site on Mount Zion as that room.
  • The current Cenacle preserves medieval architecture built atop older layers.
  • The site has been a major pilgrimage destination for over 1,600 years.
Historically uncertain:
  • Whether the current site is the exact house used by Jesus.
  • The precise layout or appearance of the original first‑century room.
Most scholars treat the Cenacle as a strong traditional site, not an archaeologically verified one.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom