The Final Solution. A dream by a Jew, not a Nazi

[Stravinsk]

So, learn something new every day.

The term "the final solution" was in fact penned by Theodore Kaufman, an American Jew, in his book "Germany must Perish!", and it referred not to Jews, but to Germans - the total extermination of them!

Prior to Kaufman, the term "the final solution" was used regularly in Zionist literature referring to a Jewish state in Palestine.


‘The Final Solution’ Did Not Come From Hitler - It Came From American Jew Theodore Kaufman

 

[Josiah]

Well, maybe that English phrase.....

But I doubt that some Jew invented the idea of killing millions of Jews in gas chambers.

 

[Stravinsk]

Well, maybe that English phrase.....

But I doubt that some Jew invented the idea of killing millions of Jews in gas chambers.

Leaving aside the question of "if", I'd rather focus temporarily on "why", this may have happened. The reason is, the question of "if" has already been settled in my mind, but I do realize that the research I've done not everyone bothers to do, and the conclusions of that research go up against a generation of popular film/entertainment and otherwise accepted history taught in western public schools.

So getting to "why" this could have happened:

The story of 6 million suffering Jews has had the following effects:

Germany, that is, it's people, have had to pay:

1. Wiedergutmachung (Compensation): Germany paid billions (est 100 billion) of Deutsche Marks in individual compensation to Holocaust survivors through the Wiedergutmachung program.
2. Luxembourg Agreement: In 1952, Germany agreed to pay Israel for Jewish property seized during the Holocaust. The initial agreement involved a payment of 3 billion Deutsche Marks.
3. Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility, and Future" (EVZ): This foundation, established in 2000, had a fund of around 10 billion Deutsche Marks, contributed by the German government and companies, to compensate forced laborers.

For the war "they" supposedly started.

The Allies (including Communist Russia) pay nothing.

Psychological:

Westerners (including yours truly) are taught primarily about the so called horrors of the Holocaust when they learn basic (government funded) history about this time. What they are not taught:

Jewish Bolshevism in Russia that killed 100's of millions of people, mostly Christians and other non-Jews.
Russian Red Army treatment of Germans after the war. The stories of mass rape, multiple rapes of German women (including young girls) and murder does not touch on western history/entertainment. So also one does not hear about the murder of German men or them being sent to Siberia to work them to death as slave labor.

Psychological 2: The primary focus on victim hood is of 6m Jews, everyone else during the period is largely forgotten about. This not only served to justify the Jewish State of Israel, but it is also used constantly to re-direct accusations against Jews. For example, Israel (the modern state) has been guilty of more war crimes than all other nations put together according to the UN since it's inception. Yet, none of these stick because the US has veto power, and it simply vetoes any declaration of guilt or any action of punishment. This is great deal for any State that wants to do whatever it wants to other people's/ nations.

Indeed, we are even seeing it now. There is a mass murder of Palestinians going on (around 75% of that population is under 24 and 50% are children). Israel is committing war crimes but it's unlikely to be held to account. And why not? Because of two psychological factors 1) The Terrorist Card and 2) The anti-semite/Holocaust denier card.

Psychological 3:

The story of the Holocaust puts Israel as the "suffering servant" - the poor so called "chosen ones" who paid the sins for the non-Jewish beasts of other nations (particularly Germany), putting them, as a people as a sort of replacement for Christ. This story extends beyond the Holocaust - because a Jew will readily tell you that they have suffered for generations (kicked out of Europe scores of times), because of their Jewishness, not because of predatory lending practices, influencing war behind the scenes, taking over banking and major media industries, corruptions of nations (Weimar Germany and even the USA today) and other sins. No, to bring that up would be "anti-semetic".

 

[Stravinsk]

More reasons why winning nations want a manufactured Holocaust:

1. It alleviates them from the obvious burden of the mass murder inflicted because of the war. They can say to their children "Look what the nazi's did to those 6 million Jews. This was a "good" war because we saved the day. Oh and btw you'd be speaking German today if not for us. " All BS of course. The Nazis did not want to take over the world, but what they did want was to save Germany and the rest of Europe from the horrors that had previously been inflicted on Russia by the Jewish Bolsheviks, while also removing the corruption that Jewish owned industry had fostered on them (all kinds of sexual perversion, including for children) and poverty. Hint hint, USA. This is you now with your transgender garbage, children being groomed/sexualized at a young age, gender surgeries, 100 genders etc. Tons of homeless everywhere in the cities. Bank runs and failures. This is YOU. You are the new Weimar Republic in the making.

2. The Nazi regime is NEVER to be remembered as in any way successful. Hitler's form of National Socialism worked, and it worked very well for the people of Germany. While the rest of the world was still suffering through the Depression, Germany became a powerhouse. How? Hitler did what Abe Lincoln did - freed his nation from the power of the money lenders, and implemented all forms of changes that were positive for the German people.

Independent nations (truly independent) are not wanted in the NWO scheme. There's only a few nations left now that don't have a Rothschild central bank, and they are demonized. Iran is one.

 

[Jason_76]

All this stuff ignores the fact Germany wanted land to the east to be stolen for Germany with the reasoning that the natives were inferior. This is true regardless of whatever Stalin did, no matter how bad.

Lincoln freed the US from money lenders? This is interesting. I thought white nationalists were for the south.

 

[Stravinsk]

All this stuff ignores the fact Germany wanted land to the east to be stolen for Germany with the reasoning that the natives were inferior. This is true regardless of whatever Stalin did, no matter how bad.

That's actually not true, but I can already see based on a variety of your posts that you've got your mind made up.

Lincoln freed the US from money lenders? This is interesting. I thought white nationalists were for the south.

Into the mind of a modern American with the learning and biases given to them by their handlers in public school education and popular entertainment.

 

[Jason_76]

That's actually not true, but I can already see based on a variety of your posts that you've got your mind made up.


Into the mind of a modern American with the learning and biases given to them by their handlers in public school education and popular entertainment.

It's probably a mixed bag. Some call Lincoln Joe Stalin, but others see him standing up to the rich elite, which I assume they think are Jewish.

 

[Josiah]

Leaving aside the question of "if", I'd rather focus temporarily on "why", this may have happened. The reason is, the question of "if" has already been settled in my mind, but I do realize that the research I've done not everyone bothers to do, and the conclusions of that research go up against a generation of popular film/entertainment and otherwise accepted history taught in western public schools.

So getting to "why" this could have happened:

The story of 6 million suffering Jews has had the following effects:

Germany, that is, it's people, have had to pay:

1. Wiedergutmachung (Compensation): Germany paid billions (est 100 billion) of Deutsche Marks in individual compensation to Holocaust survivors through the Wiedergutmachung program.
2. Luxembourg Agreement: In 1952, Germany agreed to pay Israel for Jewish property seized during the Holocaust. The initial agreement involved a payment of 3 billion Deutsche Marks.
3. Foundation "Remembrance, Responsibility, and Future" (EVZ): This foundation, established in 2000, had a fund of around 10 billion Deutsche Marks, contributed by the German government and companies, to compensate forced laborers.

For the war "they" supposedly started.

The Allies (including Communist Russia) pay nothing.

Psychological:

Westerners (including yours truly) are taught primarily about the so called horrors of the Holocaust when they learn basic (government funded) history about this time. What they are not taught:

Jewish Bolshevism in Russia that killed 100's of millions of people, mostly Christians and other non-Jews.
Russian Red Army treatment of Germans after the war. The stories of mass rape, multiple rapes of German women (including young girls) and murder does not touch on western history/entertainment. So also one does not hear about the murder of German men or them being sent to Siberia to work them to death as slave labor.

Psychological 2: The primary focus on victim hood is of 6m Jews, everyone else during the period is largely forgotten about. This not only served to justify the Jewish State of Israel, but it is also used constantly to re-direct accusations against Jews. For example, Israel (the modern state) has been guilty of more war crimes than all other nations put together according to the UN since it's inception. Yet, none of these stick because the US has veto power, and it simply vetoes any declaration of guilt or any action of punishment. This is great deal for any State that wants to do whatever it wants to other people's/ nations.

Indeed, we are even seeing it now. There is a mass murder of Palestinians going on (around 75% of that population is under 24 and 50% are children). Israel is committing war crimes but it's unlikely to be held to account. And why not? Because of two psychological factors 1) The Terrorist Card and 2) The anti-semite/Holocaust denier card.

Psychological 3:

The story of the Holocaust puts Israel as the "suffering servant" - the poor so called "chosen ones" who paid the sins for the non-Jewish beasts of other nations (particularly Germany), putting them, as a people as a sort of replacement for Christ. This story extends beyond the Holocaust - because a Jew will readily tell you that they have suffered for generations (kicked out of Europe scores of times), because of their Jewishness, not because of predatory lending practices, influencing war behind the scenes, taking over banking and major media industries, corruptions of nations (Weimar Germany and even the USA today) and other sins. No, to bring that up would be "anti-semetic".

Two wrongs don't make a right.

OF COURSE, Stalin was also a monster. The Soviet Union in the 30's and 40's ALSO did horrible, horrible things. That doesn't make Hitler nice or moral. IMO, honest historians do not deny what Hitler (and some Germans) did because Stalin (and some Russians) did much the same thing.

Rather than try to defend Hitler and condemn Jews with this made-up "history", it makes more sense to me to affirm the truth: Hitler and Stalin both did horrible, horrible things....

As an American, it smacks a bit of those who try to defend slavery and portray slave owners as the victims and slaves as blessed.



.



.

 

[Stravinsk]

Two wrongs don't make a right.

OF COURSE, Stalin was also a monster. The Soviet Union in the 30's and 40's ALSO did horrible, horrible things. That doesn't make Hitler nice or moral. IMO, honest historians do not deny what Hitler (and some Germans) did because Stalin (and some Russians) did much the same thing.

Rather than try to defend Hitler and condemn Jews with this made-up "history", it makes more sense to me to affirm the truth: Hitler and Stalin both did horrible, horrible things....

As an American, it smacks a bit of those who try to defend slavery and portray slave owners as the victims and slaves as blessed.



.



.

No, two wrongs don't make a right, and Stalin doing horrible things doesn't make Hitler a saint. Who actually uses that logic?

What "made up history" are you talking about?