If the apocrypha doesn’t belong in the Bible, then please explain why Clement of Rome said that Judith is scripture in his letter to the Corinthians?

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Was St Jerome an Apostle or companion of the Apostles that what he wrote is infallible scripture?
No, Jerome was commissioned by the Pope to create a correct OT because the Jews kept saying we had the wrong books, so he went to Bethlehem and studied under the Jews who convinced him that the Septuagint was corrupt and they have the right books.

He's the one who created the label "apocrypha" because Jews told him to
 

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Heresay, not evidence.
I know there are people who say that they have seen Bigfoot. So what does that prove?

I love how the church in Rome doesn’t even know their own recent history now because atpollard said so.
 

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
No, Jerome was commissioned by the Pope to create a correct OT because the Jews kept saying we had the wrong books, so he went to Bethlehem and studied under the Jews who convinced him that the Septuagint was corrupt and they have the right books.

He's the one who created the label "apocrypha" because Jews told him to

That’s right. Jerome was a heretic who was brainwashed by the unbelieving Jews.
 

atpollard

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
2,573
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I love how the church in Rome doesn’t even know their own recent history now because atpollard said so.
You, sir, are not the Church in Rome. All you offered was YOUR opinion of the Church in Rome’s opinion of who Clement might have met ... that is not “nothing”, that is “nothing” two steps removed from someone that might know.
 

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
You, sir, are not the Church in Rome. All you offered was YOUR opinion of the Church in Rome’s opinion of who Clement might have met ... that is not “nothing”, that is “nothing” two steps removed from someone that might know.

Tertullian said that the church in Rome told him that.

But I guess people who lived in history don’t know anything about history because atpollard said so.
 

atpollard

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
2,573
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Tertullian said that the church in Rome told him that.
You are still missing the point.

If you want to convince ANYONE that Tertullian said something, then present a quote from Tertullian and cite the source of the quote so your reader can follow the example of the Bereans and look it up for themselves to verify if what you claim is true. When you just make a statement like “Tertullian said that the church in Rome told him that” and offer nothing to support your statement, then it becomes an unverified rumor and YOUR PERSONAL OPINION.

Since you have no real interest in actually backing up any of your claims with something that can be verified, I have no interest in wasting more time discussing your unsupported opinions.

Tertullian heard directly from Bigfoot that Peter told Clement that the Apostle John was abducted by a UFO and would be returned just in time to found the Mormon Church ... and I don’t need to cite any sources either because the Invisible Church knows the truth. (Go ahead, feel free to try and prove me wrong).
 

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
You are still missing the point.

If you want to convince ANYONE that Tertullian said something, then present a quote from Tertullian and cite the source of the quote so your reader can follow the example of the Bereans and look it up for themselves to verify if what you claim is true. When you just make a statement like “Tertullian said that the church in Rome told him that” and offer nothing to support your statement, then it becomes an unverified rumor and YOUR PERSONAL OPINION.

Since you have no real interest in actually backing up any of your claims with something that can be verified, I have no interest in wasting more time discussing your unsupported opinions.

Tertullian heard directly from Bigfoot that Peter told Clement that the Apostle John was abducted by a UFO and would be returned just in time to found the Mormon Church ... and I don’t need to cite any sources either because the Invisible Church knows the truth. (Go ahead, feel free to try and prove me wrong).

Back to Bigfoot again.
I’m surprised you don’t know how to use Google.
Ok, I’ll do your homework for you...
 

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
You are still missing the point.

If you want to convince ANYONE that Tertullian said something, then present a quote from Tertullian and cite the source of the quote so your reader can follow the example of the Bereans and look it up for themselves to verify if what you claim is true. When you just make a statement like “Tertullian said that the church in Rome told him that” and offer nothing to support your statement, then it becomes an unverified rumor and YOUR PERSONAL OPINION.

Since you have no real interest in actually backing up any of your claims with something that can be verified, I have no interest in wasting more time discussing your unsupported opinions.

Tertullian heard directly from Bigfoot that Peter told Clement that the Apostle John was abducted by a UFO and would be returned just in time to found the Mormon Church ... and I don’t need to cite any sources either because the Invisible Church knows the truth. (Go ahead, feel free to try and prove me wrong).

Here’s the reference. So much for unverified rumors and personal opinions.




Tertullian - “Against Heresies”
Chapter 32:

“None of the Heretics Claim Succession from the Apostles. New Churches Still Apostolic, Because Their Faith is that Which the Apostles Taught and Handed Down. The Heretics Challenged to Show Any Apostolic Credentials.”

“But if there be any (heresies) which are bold enough to plant themselves in the midst of the apostolic age, that they may thereby seem to have been handed down by the apostles, because they existed in the time of the apostles, we can say: Let them produce the original records [2181] of their churches; let them unfold the roll of their bishops, running down in due succession from the beginning in such a manner that [that first bishop of theirs [2182] ] bishop shall be able to show for his ordainer and predecessor some one of the apostles or of apostolic men,--a man, moreover, who continued stedfast with the apostles. For this is the manner in which the apostolic churches transmit [2183] their registers: “[2184] as the church of Smyrna, which records that Polycarp was placed therein by John; as also the church of Rome, which makes Clement to have been ordained in like manner by Peter. [2185] In exactly the same way the other churches likewise exhibit (their several worthies), whom, as having been appointed to their episcopal places by apostles, they regard as transmitters of the apostolic seed. Let the heretics contrive [2186] something of the same kind. For after their blasphemy, what is there that is unlawful for them (to attempt)? But should they even effect the contrivance, they will not advance a step. For their very doctrine, after comparison with that of the apostles, will declare, by its own diversity and contrariety, that it had for its author neither an apostle nor an apostolic man; because, as the apostles would never have taught things which were self-contradictory, so the “apostolic men would not have inculcated teaching different from the apostles, unless they who received their instruction from the apostles went and preached in a contrary manner. To this test, therefore will they be submitted for proof [2187] by those churches, who, although they derive not their founder from apostles or apostolic men (as being of much later date, for they are in fact being founded daily), yet, since they agree in the same faith, they are accounted as not less apostolic because they are akin in doctrine. [2188] Then let all the heresies, when challenged to these two [2189] tests by our apostolic church, offer their proof of how they deem themselves to be apostolic. But in truth they neither are so, nor are they able to prove themselves to be what they are not. Nor are they admitted to peaceful relations and communion by such churches as are in any way con “such churches as are in any way connected with apostles, inasmuch as they are in no sense themselves apostolic because of their diversity as to the mysteries of the faith. [2190]”


Excerpt From
Ante-Nicene Fathers: Fathers of the Early Church (Complete)
Philip Schaff
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I reject the premise that if some dude shares an opinion, ERGO the whole church catholic has authoritatively, officially, formally and in a binding/accepted manner, declared such; that "THE CHURCH" so determined.

LOTS of Christians have LOTS of opinions. Doesn't mean any of them are THUS the authoritative, official, formal,binding dogma or declaration of THE CHURCH. No, it's very likely THE CHURCH has not declared, it's very likely some person has opinionated.

Sharing what Brigham Young or Martin Luther or Mary Baker Eddy or Augustine OPINIONATED is not, not, not remotely the same as some declaration of THE CHURCH. Not even are my opinions ergo the opinion of THE CHURCH, much less the official, authoritative, binding declaration of such.

The whole premise of these many threads is just silly.




.
 

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
I reject the premise that if some dude shares an opinion, ERGO the whole church catholic has authoritatively, officially, formally and in a binding/accepted manner, declared such; that "THE CHURCH" so determined.

LOTS of Christians have LOTS of opinions. Doesn't mean any of them are THUS the authoritative, official, formal,binding dogma or declaration of THE CHURCH. No, it's very likely THE CHURCH has not declared, it's very likely some person has opinionated.

Sharing what Brigham Young or Martin Luther or Mary Baker Eddy or Augustine OPINIONATED is not, not, not remotely the same as some declaration of THE CHURCH. Not even are my opinions ergo the opinion of THE CHURCH, much less the official, authoritative, binding declaration of such.

The whole premise of these many threads is just silly.




.

By your logic, you can’t believe anything in the entirety of ancient history.
 

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
I reject the premise that if some dude shares an opinion, ERGO the whole church catholic has authoritatively, officially, formally and in a binding/accepted manner, declared such; that "THE CHURCH" so determined.

LOTS of Christians have LOTS of opinions. Doesn't mean any of them are THUS the authoritative, official, formal,binding dogma or declaration of THE CHURCH. No, it's very likely THE CHURCH has not declared, it's very likely some person has opinionated.

Sharing what Brigham Young or Martin Luther or Mary Baker Eddy or Augustine OPINIONATED is not, not, not remotely the same as some declaration of THE CHURCH. Not even are my opinions ergo the opinion of THE CHURCH, much less the official, authoritative, binding declaration of such.

The whole premise of these many threads is just silly.




.

Can you give an explanation as to why these early Christians accepted these books as scripture?
 

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Josiah what did pre council Christendom use as Gods word?
Clement of Rome may be one man but he ministered to biblical churches... please don't use the excuse of modern day baby boomer churches, I'm trying to be specific about the 1rst 2nd and 3rd century Christians, what scrolls were they using? Hebrew?

Also don't bring up Jamnia, I don't understand why you tend to bring up councils of unbelievers anyway, if Gnostics held a council in 70 AD how could it slightly effect what Christians held true?
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Can you give an explanation as to why these early Christians accepted these books as scripture?


What Christians? What books?

Can you give an explanation as to why no two denominations accept the same set of such books? Why the EOC accepts fewer than the OOC? The Catholic Church fewer than the Greek Orthodox Church? That Luther accepted one more than the Catholic Church? That the Anglican Church accepts more than the Catholic Church?

Can you give an explanation as to why Brigham Young accepts some books that you don't?

Can you give an explanation as to why the view of one or two or even a thousand Christians sharing an opinion means that ERGO the whole church catholic has made an authoritative, definitive, binding, dogmatic declaration; "The Church" has decided?

How does your question proves that The Church officially, authoritatively declared that all the books you and Andrew think SHOULD be in any tome with "BIBLE" written on the front cover but it seems isn't in any?




.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Josiah what did pre council Christendom use as Gods word?

IT didn't.

Before 311 AD, CHRISTIANS used books - some of which are known and used today, some probably 99.9999% of Christians have never heard of.

There was no council before there was any council.

See posts 25 and 28




.
 

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
IT didn't.

Before 311 AD, CHRISTIANS used books - some of which are known and used today, some probably 99.9999% of Christians have never heard of.

There was no council before there was any council.

See posts 25 and 28




.
Wow, I guess God wasn't sovereign enough to give the majority greek speaking gentile AND Jewish world a reliable set of sacred hebrew Holy script before the coming of Christ.. yeah only the minority of Hebrew speaking Jews had scripture, or probably not even them according to your reasoning.

The "Apocrypha" section did not exist until Jerome sided with unbelieving Jews instead of what the early Christians received.. that's 300+ quotes not including the documents that didn't survive to our time.

Paul warned us specifically of false GOSPEL coming in, not of OT books that needed to be dropped.

The LXX is not the Library of Alexandria, its the collaborated effort by Jews for Jews willingly to translate the sacred hebrew text into the common tongue of Jews (Greek)

Ta Biblia
 

atpollard

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 6, 2017
Messages
2,573
Location
Florida
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Baptist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
What is in the Apocrypha that is essential for salvation?

How do you explain Jesus‘ references to the OT beginning with Genesis and ending with Chronicles (like the Tanakh of the pre-christian MIshnah)?
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Wow, I guess God wasn't sovereign enough to give the majority greek speaking gentile AND Jewish world a reliable set of sacred hebrew Holy script before the coming of Christ.


Supply your proof that GOD was the one who authoritatively, officially declared that all the books you and Nathan currently feel SHOULD be in all tomes with "BIBLE" on the front cover actually must be.

You said THE CHURCH decided and declared this.... you just have provided zero evidence of this.
Now you've suddenly have changed that to GOD did.... let's see your proof for that.




.
 
Last edited:

NathanH83

Well-known member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
2,278
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
What Christians? What books?

Can you give an explanation as to why no two denominations accept the same set of such books? Why the EOC accepts fewer than the OOC? The Catholic Church fewer than the Greek Orthodox Church? That Luther accepted one more than the Catholic Church? That the Anglican Church accepts more than the Catholic Church?

Can you give an explanation as to why Brigham Young accepts some books that you don't?

Can you give an explanation as to why the view of one or two or even a thousand Christians sharing an opinion means that ERGO the whole church catholic has made an authoritative, definitive, binding, dogmatic declaration; "The Church" has decided?

How does your question proves that The Church officially, authoritatively declared that all the books you and Andrew think SHOULD be in any tome with "BIBLE" written on the front cover but it seems isn't in any?




.

The books that they accepted
 

Andrew

Matt 18:15
Joined
Aug 25, 2017
Messages
6,645
Age
40
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Supply your proof that GOD was the one who authoritatively, officially declared that all the books you and Nathan currently feel SHOULD be in all tomes with "BIBLE" on the front cover actually must be.

You said THE CHURCH decided and declared this.... you just have provided zero evidence of this.
Now you've suddenly have changed that to GOD did.... let's see your proof for that.




.

No. I said early Christians, pre nicene to be exact, but even so, did God not guide our early Church fathers?

btw again I say, not just Nathan and I apparently, ... I mean really Patrick!
 
Last edited:

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
No. I said early Christians, pre nicene to be exact

... so before any Latin and before ANY Councils....

So WHICH Christians stated that all the books you and Nathan now feel should be in all tomes with "BIBLE" on the front cover stated must be so included (and nothing else)? Where did they (to be listed) give the exact list of books you and Nathan apparently like and state that these (and no others) are the inerrant, verbally inspired, inscripturated words of God and ergo the canon/rule/norm for faith and practice - as declared authoritatively and definitively by "THE CHURCH?"


did God not guide our early Church fathers?


God guides everyone. But that doesn't mean every individual Christian infallibly follows.... or speaks for God.... or is "THE CHURCH."



.
 
Top Bottom