Andrew
Matt 18:15
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2017
- Messages
- 6,645
- Age
- 40
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Political Affiliation
- Conservative
- Marital Status
- Single
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
Well you mentioned its a part of the process, I'm good with that. We still have been patrolling the wall its not like we just build the extensions and then dust our hands and walk away.The trouble is that the issue of a border wall isn't as simple as a comparison to houses and the like. Some have argued that if walls don't work it must mean prisoners stay in jail voluntarily. It's clearly absurd to think that if you took away the walls of a prison all the inmates would stay out of a sense of duty to complete their sentences, but it isn't a like-for-like comparison. A prisoner doesn't have access to digging equipment, nor are there areas of the prison wall where a prisoner can spend hours at a time digging without being noticed by a guard. Unless you're going to post guards along the entire length of a border wall the chances are somebody is going to dig underneath it, especially if there is a tangible benefit in doing so. We've already seen drug runners bringing their wares into the country through tunnels so it shouldn't be a surprise that it's possible.
Prisoners also don't have access to aircraft and handy parts of the prison boundary that aren't patrolled very often. The border wall can be bypassed by anyone with access to an aircraft - they just hop right on over.
Prisoners also very seldom get chance to leave the prison. When a lot of illegal immigration is a result of overstaying a visa it's just another way the comparison isn't valid. If a maximum security prisoner could check himself out of prison to go shopping for the afternoon, the comparison would work better.
It is important to make sure people who aren't supposed to be here don't get here and are removed if they are found. The trouble is that a wall is only one part of the process and that criminals tend to go for the lowest hanging fruit. For many would-be illegal immigrants the chances are walking across the border, through the desert, hoping they survive the journey, probably isn't the most obvious method of choice to cross the border. It seems easier to hide in the back of a truck that's headed north - that way even if you get caught you're dropped off near the border ready to have another go.
I would rather they hide themselves in a vehicle and pass security than to hear of them drowning or being kidnapped in the process.. A big fat wall will at least remind them to try other options and perhaps not travel all the way to the wall knowing it was going to be their.
Obama wanted an armed presence at the border, the wall is more humane, and if they decide to start digging well then we will see how they do it and then stop it, the wall is practical and humane step to tighter border security.
And for those who want open borders...
Undocumented criminals entering in America is a national threat and military funding for the wall is appropriate.
I would like to know if my neighbor is a sex offender because my nieces and nephews come visit from time to time, thus every one here needs criminal history records so appropriate measures can be issued for repeat offenders, without identity and records we are putting ourselves in harms way.