Priest casting out demons in congress

[Andrew]

I didn't even know we had a House Chaplin.. anyway he seems afraid to even utter the name Jesus Christ and in the second video he tickles the ears of the LGBT community by saying stuff like..
"it's not a sin to be gay or lesbian or straight...but it is a sin to behave or to engage in action that is considered sinful"
"our answers don't work anymore that messes us up we have to come up with new answers...how might God be present in the homosexual experience?"
https://youtu.be/6xQcnP3-pwo
https://youtu.be/MwBTBGUHOm0

 

[psalms 91]

First he is right it is not sinful to have attractions of any kind the sin is when we act on it. Second, congress definitely has demons how else can you explain the hatred and vitrol flowing like water there anymore

 

[Andrew]

First he is right it is not sinful to have attractions of any kind the sin is when we act on it. Second, congress definitely has demons how else can you explain the hatred and vitrol flowing like water there anymore

What does Jesus say about looking at somebody with lust?

 

[psalms 91]

There is a divide between attraction and lust, it is not sinful to feel the urge but it is sinful to dwell on it and of course probably eventually act

 

[tango]

What does Jesus say about looking at somebody with lust?

You can be gay without looking at someone with lust. There's a huge difference between being attracted to someone and lusting after them - to be honest using lines like that in an attempt to suggest certain forms of temptation are sinful is really unhelpful.

It's not a sin for me to look at a woman other than my wife and think she's attractive. That's just how God made me. What is sinful is to dwell on that and to lust after her. If I were wired differently you could swap out the woman for a man and the same would apply - no sin in being attracted but lusting becomes sinful.

I think a large part of the problem where the LGBT community is concerned is that the church seems to largely split either side of a line, with one group wanting to do little more than thump the table and shout about abominations and the other wringing their hands and saying everything is OK. It's perfectly possible to accept and love the person without regarding their specific sins as being acceptable. Of course these days anything relating to sexual expression seems to be little more than a free-for-all even as other things are ignored.

 

[Jason76]

Yeah, as [MENTION=62]tango[/MENTION] was hinting at - the Bible condemns lust - gay or straight. Why won't evangelicals get tough on "straight sexual immorality"?

 

[Andrew]

No I definitely understand, Americans are bombarded with overly sexualized images and frankly im a bit embarrassed to live in America for that exact reason, little kids being forced into sex discussions and transgender tolerance is yet another perversion of youth that we don't need.. No young kids who aren't even near that age of sexual feelings should be learning all this junk.
I get the whole gay pride parade, I get that it's basically celebration of homosexual and lesbian sex and adultery... There's good evidence of occultic "sex magik" rituals being practiced through hollywood and Disney films for our American youth to become desensitized by lowering their inhibitions, this practise of ancient occult sex rituals date back to the times of the Romans all the back to the Egyptians. When the youth has lowered their inhibitions and have become desensitized they become open to just about anything as they've been stripped of any moral that they had and become degenerates who will be raised to be totally dependent on government as god. The scary thing about this is that the practise has not been used since the roman empire and now its here in America.
So LGBT is a community of sexual exhibitionist, these are not the same as say a cousin who is a homosexual or lesbian, yes of course it's the acting on these lustful sins that condemns the person but not because they find a person of the same sex attractive.

 

[tango]

Yeah, as [MENTION=62]tango[/MENTION] was hinting at - the Bible condemns lust - gay or straight. Why won't evangelicals get tough on "straight sexual immorality"?

Who says they don't? I'm sure there are some churches that turn a blind eye to all sorts of things but let's not go painting with the widest brush we can find.

 

[Jason76]

No I definitely understand, Americans are bombarded with overly sexualized images and frankly im a bit embarrassed to live in America for that exact reason, little kids being forced into sex discussions and transgender tolerance is yet another perversion of youth that we don't need.. No young kids who aren't even near that age of sexual feelings should be learning all this junk.
I get the whole gay pride parade, I get that it's basically celebration of homosexual and lesbian sex and adultery... There's good evidence of occultic "sex magik" rituals being practiced through hollywood and Disney films for our American youth to become desensitized by lowering their inhibitions, this practise of ancient occult sex rituals date back to the times of the Romans all the back to the Egyptians. When the youth has lowered their inhibitions and have become desensitized they become open to just about anything as they've been stripped of any moral that they had and become degenerates who will be raised to be totally dependent on government as god. The scary thing about this is that the practise has not been used since the roman empire and now its here in America.
So LGBT is a community of sexual exhibitionist, these are not the same as say a cousin who is a homosexual or lesbian, yes of course it's the acting on these lustful sins that condemns the person but not because they find a person of the same sex attractive.

LGBT would be another oppressed community - who in the start - had good reason to be angry, but later have gone amok.

Those without God's spirit, good parents cannot deal with being "picked on", so they resort to "group revenge".