My observance of BLM in response to Cannon Hinnant's death

[Andrew]

The organization BLM does not support the sentiment of BLM, the movement is one of many and the banner itself is not necessarily a hijack, but rather an exploitation from the very beginning.. The Nazis hid behind the banner of economic welfare for the german people while blindly supporting an organization that instituted the mass genocide of the jewish race from their country.
Now here we are, far left radicals Vs. far right radicals, the silent majority are the level headed people of both parties in-between the extremists but sadly the mainstream media has a free run to hinder or endorse (manipulate) public opinion as long as we give them recognition (in broadcast terms "SHARES").. not necessarily a political agenda more than it is monetary stamina, seeing they are losing their SHARES to social media platforms..
Like the Nazis, mainstream propaganda networking is using the banner of BLM to protect their monetary "news-trust-worthy" supremacy while supporting a party of extremists -which exploits American demographics by demonizing a specific race or "social class" (mainly straight white conservative males) for simply existing..
Cannon will not get his riots, just like the Jews during Hitler's tyranny didn't riot.. Godly people do not riot.

 

[Lamb]

If BLM weren't so violent they would get more approval from people. The media seems to thrive on that drama as if it's justified...which it's not.

 

[tango]

If BLM demonstrated that they believed black lives matter they would probably get more respect too. As it stands they care enough to riot if a black man is killed by a white cop but if a black man is killed by another black man in inner-city violence the silence is deafening.

If black lives truly mattered to BLM you'd have thought they would be protesting the policies that lead to the premature demise of so many black lives in Detroit, Baltimore, Chicago etc.