Justified Leper?

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Leviticus 13:46 (context is the leper/leprosy)
As long as he has the infection, he remains unclean. He must live alone in a place outside the camp.

Hebrews 13:13 BSB
Therefore let us go to Him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace He bore.

2 Corinthians 5:21 NKJV
For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.
 
Last edited:

Odë:hgöd

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
Messages
1,538
Age
80
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
.
Content Withdrawn
_
 
Last edited:

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,649
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Leviticus 13:46 (context is the leper/leprosy)
As long as he has the infection, he remains unclean. He must live alone in a place outside the camp.

Hebrews 13:13 BSB
Therefore let us go to Him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace He bore.

2 Corinthians 5:21 NKJV
For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.

Is there a question? Could you elaborate on why you chose those verses?
 

Origen

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
817
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Is there a question? Could you elaborate on why you chose those verses?
The application of Lev. 13:46 to Heb. 13:13 really does not work. The context of Lev. 13:46 is one concerning leper/leprosy and has nothing to do with blood sacrifice\atonement.

The author of Hebrew is more likely pointing to Lev 16:27.

"And the bull for the sin offering and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the Holy Place, shall be carried outside the camp. Their skin and their flesh and their dung shall be burned up with fire."

This fits the imagery and context of Heb. 13:11-13 much better.

"For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood. Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured."
 

Lees

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,182
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
There is much to learn about sin and leprosy in the Bible. Leprosy is often associated with sin in the Bible. And though (Lev. 13) describes the identification of leprosy in a person or in their clothes, (Lev. 14) goes on to describe the lepers cleansing once, or if, he is healed. (Lev. 14:3)

And in reading through (Lev. 14), I find no place where an individual's sin is mentioned as the cause of the leprosy. Yet part of the cleansing process has to do with the offering and killing of sacrifices. (Lev. 14:4-7) (Lev. 14:10) And it is specifically stated that some of these are for a trespass and sin offering. (Lev. 14:12) (Lev. 14:19) And, that these offerings are to make atonement for the one in question. (Lev. 14:31)

It is as though leprosy is to be identified as sin. And the leper must dwell alone without, or outside, the camp. (Lev. 13:46) Why? In order to maintain cleanliness within the camp. (Lev. 14:57) In order to remove sin outside the camp. (Ex. 29:14)

But, in all these sacrifices the blood, which is for the atonement, was kept within the camp and applied to the Tabernacle or Temple. (Ex. 29:12-13). Only the flesh and dung and skin were burnt outside the camp. (Ex. 29:14) Atonement is made for the people's sins, sin is cast outside the camp, and the camp is clean and holy. Sanctified.

Yet, at times, it is the camp that is unclean and sinful. During Moses stay in the Mountain, receiving the Law from God, the camp turned to idolatry and sinful living. (Ex. 32:1-6) Result? Moses moved the temporary tabernacle tent, which was the place of meeting until the Tabernacle proper was built, outside the camp. (Ex. 33:7) The camp was supposed to be clean and holy. Outside the camp was the place of sin and defilement. But the camp is now the place of sin and defilement. And outside the camp is where God would make his presence known and where He meets. (Ex. 33:9-11)

The writer of (Hebrews), Paul, knows his audience. Jews. They are familiar with 'outside the camp'. Paul in (Heb. 13:13) is encouraging these Christian Jews to not go back to the camp which is unclean. Cleanliness and holiness is now found outside the camp. God, and Christ are found outside the camp.

In other words, God was no longer found in Israel. He was, and still is to this day, outside of Israel. That will change one day, of course. But as of now, it is still true.

Can application be made to the church of our day? I believe it can. (Rev. 3:20) Christ is on the outside of the church beckoning those that can hear to open the door. Just as Israel became unclean and defiled, so too will/has the church, as represented in the world.

My opinion

Lees
 
Last edited:

Lees

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2022
Messages
2,182
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
A further note.

In (Deuteronomy) Moses is going over the Law and giving instructions concerning it. And in (Deut. 24) Moses addresses divorce, a new wife, making a slave of a fellow Israelite, laws of lending, etc. etc.

In (Deut. 24:8-9) Moses warns, "Take heed in the plague of leprosy, that thou observe diligently, and do according to all that the priests the Levites shall teach you: as I commanded them, so ye shall observe to do. Remember what the LORD thy God did unto Miriam by the way after that ye were come forth out of Egypt."

And what did the LORD do to Miriam? He smote her with leprosy when she and Aaron questioned Moses authority. (Num. 12:9-10) Causing Aaron to say to the LORD, "...lay not the sin upon us, wherein we have done foolishly, and wherein we have sinned. Let her not be as one dead...." (Num. 12:11-12) Thus Miriam was cast outside the camp for 7 days infected with the sinful disease of leprosy till she was healed. (Num. 12:13-16)

It sounds strange that a disease should be associated with sin. That it should be synonymous with sin. But that is how the LORD sees it. And just prior to Moses warning of leprosy in (Deut. 24:8-9), Moses made a statement that supports this. (Deut. 24:7) Here Moses says the person who enslaves an Israelite shall die. And in killing that one the verse closes with "and thou shalt put evil away from among you". This serves to introduce what is said in (Deut. 24:8-9). Putting evil away from among you. Putting leprosy away from among you outside the camp.

Lees
 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Is there a question? Could you elaborate on why you chose those verses?
The question was in the Title of the post.
I was asking do the verses show our identification with Jesus?, Who was treated as a leper Heb 13:13 along with Lev 13:46 and since he took on our sin (typed as leprosy) 2Cor 5:21 so that we are made the righteousness of God.
So in a sense we are justified lepers
 

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes

Origen

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2021
Messages
817
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I don't recall bringing up blood sacrifice.
You didn't. BUT the author of Hebrews did, and that is the context of the passage, not leprosy.

"For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood. Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured."

The author draws upon Lev. 16:27 to make his point.
"And the bull for the sin offering and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the Holy Place, shall be carried outside the camp. Their skin and their flesh and their dung shall be burned up with fire."
 
Last edited:

prism

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2022
Messages
711
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
You didn't. BUT the author of Hebrews did, and that is the context of the passage, not leprosy.

"For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood. Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured."

The author draws upon Lev. 16:27 to make his point.
"And the bull for the sin offering and the goat for the sin offering, whose blood was brought in to make atonement in the Holy Place, shall be carried outside the camp. Their skin and their flesh and their dung shall be burned up with fire."
Here was my intent from post# 7...

"I was asking do the verses show our identification with Jesus?, Who was treated as a leper Heb 13:13 along with Lev 13:46 and since he took on our sin (typed as leprosy) 2Cor 5:21 so that we are made the righteousness of God.
So in a sense we are justified lepers."
 
Top Bottom