Jesus is the Good Samaritan

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Martin Luther Sermon - Parable of the Good Samaritan

""Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?"

5. This lawyer was perhaps a wise man and well acquainted with the Scriptures, as his answer also suggests; yet here he becomes a fool, and must first begin to learn from the Lord, when he is put to shame and disgrace. For Christ teaches him a good lesson, and with one word takes out of him all his self-conceit. For he was in the delusion that he had kept the law wholly and perfectly, and was therefore something extra, above others, which undoubtedly he was, and imagined, because he was so pious and learned, that he was of course worthy to talk with the Lord. But now what does the Lord do to ensnare him in a masterly manner? He does this: he permits him to judge himself. For the Evangelist proceeds thus: "


...

"17. To love God with all the mind is to take to nothing except that which is pleasing to God. By which is meant the self-conceit which man has that the same be directed to God and that all things be pleasing to him.

18. Thus you see what the commandment requires: "Thou. shalt love God." Thou, thou wholly and fully, not thy hands, not thy lips, not thy knees. Those who do this, fulfil the commandment in the right sense. But there is not a man on earth who thus fulfils the law; yea, we all do just the opposite. Thus this law here makes us all sinners so that not the least letter of this commandment is fulfilled, even by the most holy persons in the world. For no one clings so firmly to God with all the heart, that he could forsake all things for God's sake. We have, God be praised, become so competent that we can almost not suffer the least word, yea, we will not let go of a nickel for the sake of God. "


...

"25. This Samaritan of course is our Lord Jesus Christ himself, who has shown his love toward God and his neighbor. Toward God, in that be was obedient to him, came down from heaven and became man, and thus fulfilled the will of his Father; toward his neighbor, in that he immediately after bis baptism began to preach, to do wonders, to heal the sick. And in short, he did no work that centered in himself alone, but all his acts centered in his neighbor. And this he did with all his powers, and thus he became our servant, who could have well remained in heaven and been equal to God, Phil. 2, 6. But all this he did because he knew that this pleased God and was his Father's will.

26. When he entered upon that high mission to prove that he loved God with all his heart, he laid down his bodily life with all he had, and said: Father, here you have all, my bodily life, my glory and honor, which I had among the people; all this I give as it is for thy sake, that the world may know how I love thee. "


...

"28. The man who here lies half dead, wounded and stripped of his clothing' is Adam and all mankind. The murderers are the devils who robbed and wounded us, and left us lying prostrate half dead. We still struggle a little for life; but there lies horse and man, we cannot help ourselves to our feet, and if we were left thus lying we would have to die by reason of our great anguish and lack of nourishment; maggots would grow in our wounds, followed by great misery and distress. "

...

"30. But the Samaritan who has fulfilled the law and is perfectly healthy and sound, comes and does more than both priest and Levite. He binds up the sores of the wounded man, pours in oil and wine, lifts him upon his own beast, and brings him into the inn, takes good care of him, and when he departs he carefully commends him to the host, and besides leaves him a sufficient supply of money, while neither the priest nor Levite would do one of these kind acts. The priest signifies the dear sainted fathers before Moses; the Levite the priesthood of the Old Testament. All these however have accomplished nothing by their works, and have passed by on the other side like this priest and Levite. "
 

ImaginaryDay2

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
3,967
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I wonder at the severity of Luther here. I'd read the sermon as posted and it reads much like I would expect a 16th-Century Protestant Reformation message. I understand that there was a desire to make the distinction between "Law" and "Gospel", as Luther does here, however the severity that he sees in Christ addressing the man educated in the Law is missing from the discourse. It's just not there. Christ was more than able and willing to condemn the ones who came to him to trick him or rely on their own righteousness:

NASB said:
You brood of vipers, how can you, being evil, speak what is good? For the mouth speaks out of that which fills the heart. The good man brings out of his good treasure what is good; and the evil man brings out of his evil treasure what is evil (Mat. 12:34-35)

What I still see in the discourse with the expert in the law was not a rebuke and revealing of an ignorant man, but a teacher willing to demonstrate the (true) Law of God to a willing student. There's no indication that the man went away in shame, but rather that he learned from the parable and was commanded to "do likewise" - as we all should.
 

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I wonder at the severity of Luther here. I'd read the sermon as posted and it reads much like I would expect a 16th-Century Protestant Reformation message. I understand that there was a desire to make the distinction between "Law" and "Gospel", as Luther does here, however the severity that he sees in Christ addressing the man educated in the Law is missing from the discourse. It's just not there. Christ was more than able and willing to condemn the ones who came to him to trick him or rely on their own righteousness:



What I still see in the discourse with the expert in the law was not a rebuke and revealing of an ignorant man, but a teacher willing to demonstrate the (true) Law of God to a willing student. There's no indication that the man went away in shame, but rather that he learned from the parable and was commanded to "do likewise" - as we all should.

Could the man love God with all his heart and his neighbor as himself...every minute...every day...every year? The answer is clearly NO. We cannot do what is commanded by the Law. We can try and Jesus of course wants us to try but He knows we cannot be perfectly obedient that the Law demands. Which is why HE is that perfect Samaritan. For God so loved the world...
 

ImaginaryDay2

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
3,967
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Could the man love God with all his heart and his neighbor as himself...every minute...every day...every year? The answer is clearly NO. We cannot do what is commanded by the Law. We can try and Jesus of course wants us to try but He knows we cannot be perfectly obedient that the Law demands. Which is why HE is that perfect Samaritan. For God so loved the world...

That's not a response to my point. Is the passage a rebuke of an ignorant man, or the teaching of a willing student? Where is the arrogance of the man shown and the stiff rebuke from the Lord that Luther claims is there but scripture doesn't bear out? Did the man leave in shame, or as one having learned about the true Law of God?

There was a request in the other thread to discuss "righteous". I did that, referring to the word in context. There was no discussion of that, but something about the thread "going on a tangent" (after I made a post that referred back to the OP), and this one was created. What are we here to discuss? Parroting Luther, or discussing the points made by him? It's been said many times that Lutherans don't follow Luther, we follow Christ. And, as I said, the sermon in context reads as a 16th-Century Protestant sermon; so I also view it in that light.
 
Last edited:

Lamb

God's Lil Lamb
Community Team
Administrator
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2015
Messages
32,653
Age
57
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
That's not a response to my point. Is the passage a rebuke of an ignorant man, or the teaching of a willing student? Where is the arrogance of the man shown and the stiff rebuke from the Lord that Luther claims is there but scripture doesn't bear out? Did the man leave in shame, or as one having learned about the true Law of God?

There was a request in the other thread to discuss "righteous". I did that, referring to the word in context. There was no discussion of that, but something about the thread "going on a tangent" (after I made a post that referred back to the OP), and this one was created. What are we here to discuss? Parroting Luther, or discussing the points made by him? It's been said many times that Lutherans don't follow Luther, we follow Christ. And, as I said, the sermon in context reads as a 16th-Century Protestant sermon; so I also view it in that light.


The text begins with this:

On one occasion an expert in the law stood up to test Jesus.
which shows that he wasn't a willing student since he was an "expert" already.


The end of the text continues with The expert in the law replied...showing that he still leaned on his own doing to justify himself as the text also states above earlier in the passage: But he wanted to justify himself,

Luther correctly identifies that man can't do what the Law demands and that Jesus is only capable of doing it. Jesus is the Good Samaritan.
 

ImaginaryDay2

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
3,967
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Moderate
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Looking at the passage a bit more and studying it I don't disagree about Christ being the Good Samaritan here. There are some other things about the parable I'm looking into, though. That's why I ask questions and clarify things. I'll discuss before I state conclusions I hold - they're often wrong, or missing important information. I found something that's quite interesting - something that supports both of our points a bit. The quote here is at the bottom of the page in the link, and has been the point I've been trying to make:

Christ as the Good Samaritan said:
The Good Samaritan, the neighbour who is a helper and will make him a helper, is not far from the lawyer. The primitive exegesis of the text was fundamentally right. He stands before him incarnate, although hidden under the form of one whom the lawyer believed he should hate, as the Jews hated the Samaritans. Jesus does not accuse the man, although judgment obviously hangs over him. Judgment is preceded by grace. Before this neighbour makes His claim He makes His offer. Go and do likewise means: Follow thou Me. (Karl Barth, Church Dogmatics I/2, III, §18, pp 418-419, emphasis mine)
https://jamespedlar.wordpress.com/2010/07/03/christ-as-the-good-samaritan/
 
Top Bottom