Odë:hgöd
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
- Messages
- 1,538
- Age
- 80
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
.
FAQ: How was Christ biologically related to Adam without having a biological
father? (Luke 1:26-34)
A: The woman wasn't a discreet creation, i.e. Eve wasn't a solo specimen
constructed directly from dust like Adam was; instead, Eve was made from already
created human material taken from Adam's body. (Gen 2:21-22)
In other words: chemically, organically, and biologically; Eve was just as much
the Man as Adam; except of course for gender. (Gen 2:23)
So then, any posterity that Eve's body might engender would be Adam's posterity
just as much as they would be hers because every part of the posterity's bodies--
including their brains --would be constructed with material taken from their
mother's body; which was, in turn, constructed with material taken from Adam's
body.
Addressing the Serpent, God said:
"I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her
seed; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." (Gen 3:15)
Pretty much everybody on both sides of the aisle agrees that passage predicted
Christ.
"her seed" indicates that Christ would be Eve's biological posterity; and if so, then
he would also be Adam's biological posterity because all of Eve's bodily parts and
functions were constructed of material taken from Adam's body.
There's more.
Mary's pregnancy is stated to be caused not by an implant, rather, caused by
conception.
• Luke 1:31 . .You will conceive in your womb, and bear a son, and you shall name
him Jesus.
In order for Mary's pregnancy to be the result of conception, her body's seed would
have to be involved. Well, unless someone can prove beyond the slightest hint of
sensible doubt that Mary's body was in no way the biological posterity of Eve's
body, then we have to conclude that Eve's seed was the origin of Mary's seed; and
if so, then the origin of Mary's seed was Adam's body.
_
FAQ: How was Christ biologically related to Adam without having a biological
father? (Luke 1:26-34)
A: The woman wasn't a discreet creation, i.e. Eve wasn't a solo specimen
constructed directly from dust like Adam was; instead, Eve was made from already
created human material taken from Adam's body. (Gen 2:21-22)
In other words: chemically, organically, and biologically; Eve was just as much
the Man as Adam; except of course for gender. (Gen 2:23)
So then, any posterity that Eve's body might engender would be Adam's posterity
just as much as they would be hers because every part of the posterity's bodies--
including their brains --would be constructed with material taken from their
mother's body; which was, in turn, constructed with material taken from Adam's
body.
Addressing the Serpent, God said:
"I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your seed and her
seed; he shall bruise your head, and you shall bruise his heel." (Gen 3:15)
Pretty much everybody on both sides of the aisle agrees that passage predicted
Christ.
"her seed" indicates that Christ would be Eve's biological posterity; and if so, then
he would also be Adam's biological posterity because all of Eve's bodily parts and
functions were constructed of material taken from Adam's body.
There's more.
Mary's pregnancy is stated to be caused not by an implant, rather, caused by
conception.
• Luke 1:31 . .You will conceive in your womb, and bear a son, and you shall name
him Jesus.
In order for Mary's pregnancy to be the result of conception, her body's seed would
have to be involved. Well, unless someone can prove beyond the slightest hint of
sensible doubt that Mary's body was in no way the biological posterity of Eve's
body, then we have to conclude that Eve's seed was the origin of Mary's seed; and
if so, then the origin of Mary's seed was Adam's body.
_
Last edited: