Children on death row.

Jerlene

Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2019
Messages
20
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Catholic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Do you think children should be eligible for death row?

I absolutely believe they should. If someone older did the same exact crime and the death penalty was a result of that then the child should endure the same consequences. I don't care about age here. If you're old enough to do the crime, you're old enough to do the time.
But I'm sure others feel different and I'd love to hear other peoples' opinions.
 

JRT

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 30, 2016
Messages
780
Age
81
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
That depends very much on the age of the child and the circumstances. Children are not born with a fully formed conscience and gain the ability to perceive the consequences of their actions only after a period of time. This is not a cut and dried situation.
 

Josiah

simul justus et peccator
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jun 12, 2015
Messages
13,927
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Lutheran
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I'm opposed to the death penalty.
 

NewCreation435

Well-known member
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
5,045
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
There are some who are technically still considered "minors" but are old enough that they clearly should have known better and could still be charged as an adult such as a 15 year old or some who are older who murder or commit other offenses.
 

psalms 91

Well-known member
Moderator
Valued Contributor
Supporting Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2015
Messages
15,282
Age
75
Location
Pa
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Charismatic
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Married
I agree with the last post that there are those who should be tried as adults but I strongly disagree with nthe death penelty as it stand s in the USA. To many innocent people have been sentanced to death
 

ValleyGal

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
4,202
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
I do not agree with the death penalty, but if I did, I think there would need to be an assessment done by a developmental psychologist to determine development of conscience, morals, and capacity. An 8-yar-old might be in such a strong tantrum and stab a parent to death in that tantrum, but developmentally, they are far too young to understand the consequences of the actions. A 17-year-old is MORE responsible, but even at that age, their brains are under-developed, though their knowledge of laws is likely enough that they are responsible and could be tried and sentenced as an adult. I also think fMRI should be part of the assessment, as for some people with mental illnesses, there can be lesions on certain parts of the brain that affect conscience and moral development.
 

Lucian Hodoboc

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
1,343
Location
Eastern Europe
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Theist
Political Affiliation
Conservative
Marital Status
Single
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
No
I'm opposed to the death penalty.

This.^

I think that no one should be on death row (unless there's a clear divine sign, that can be confirmed by the large majority of people on earth, ordering the execution). Vengeance belongs to God.
 

hedrick

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
683
Age
75
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Single
The reason there's a separate justice system for minors is that children's decision-making capabilities aren't fully formed. Even at 18. I don't think we always take advantage of that difference to treat children and youth in ways that will help them develop. But the distinction still make sense, and the seriousness of the crime is not relevant.
 

tango

... and you shall live ...
Valued Contributor
Joined
Jul 13, 2015
Messages
14,695
Location
Realms of chaos
Gender
Male
Religious Affiliation
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
Yes
Without getting into the discussion of whether the death penalty is appropriate, I think that if you do the crime you do the time. Some legal systems have the concept of diminished responsibility that covers situations where someone was triggered by some kind of long-standing problem and did something they might not normally do. This is different from justified homicide - we're not talking about a battered wife who finally fights back with deadly force, but perhaps a situation when a neighbor who has endured noise all day and all night for weeks finally pays the offending neighbor a visit and someone ends up dead.

The trouble with an objectively defined "age of responsibility" is that the pressure is always on to raise it, and children below the age can run riot while the law is powerless to do anything about it. Needless to say gangs then start using younger children to carry out their dirty work knowing that, even if the kids get caught, the police can literally do nothing.
 

MeowsePad

Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2019
Messages
16
Age
32
Gender
Female
Religious Affiliation
Atheist
Political Affiliation
Liberal
Marital Status
In Relationship
Nobody should be on death row. The death penalty is more expensive than life imprisonment, impossible to apply fairly, and simply barbaric. It also has been confirmed to be an ineffective deterrent to crime by study after study. There also is virtually no way to be one hundred percent sure that someone is guilty. Even DNA and eyewitness accounts can be inaccurate. Videos can be manipulated or misinterpreted. It's a lot easier to let someone who is found to be innocent out of jail than to resurrect someone from the dead...
 
Top Bottom