- Joined
- Jul 13, 2015
- Messages
- 19,198
- Location
- Western Australia
- Gender
- Male
- Religious Affiliation
- Catholic
- Political Affiliation
- Moderate
- Marital Status
- Single
- Acceptance of the Trinity & Nicene Creed
- Yes
Why do you need to "swipe right" to answer a phone call? Why not just have a green answer button and a red decline button?
why do you need to swipe down to turn off? Why not just turn off after the power button is pressed for a while?
Why not offer "sight impaired" and "dexterity impaired" assistive options on the standard user interface. Surely smart phone makers know that the world has a lot of children and old people in it. And a lot of people who need glasses.
Why do smart phone makers keep aiming for thinner, lighter, less durable phones when it must be obvious to everybody that phones do get dropped, do get damp or rained upon and so forth. Are the phone makers so cynical that they deliberately leave these faults intact in the hope that buyers will break their phones and buy a new one?
It must be bad business. Why isn't the market place and competition addressing these very obvious faults?
why do you need to swipe down to turn off? Why not just turn off after the power button is pressed for a while?
Why not offer "sight impaired" and "dexterity impaired" assistive options on the standard user interface. Surely smart phone makers know that the world has a lot of children and old people in it. And a lot of people who need glasses.
Why do smart phone makers keep aiming for thinner, lighter, less durable phones when it must be obvious to everybody that phones do get dropped, do get damp or rained upon and so forth. Are the phone makers so cynical that they deliberately leave these faults intact in the hope that buyers will break their phones and buy a new one?
It must be bad business. Why isn't the market place and competition addressing these very obvious faults?