Search results

I hear the argument often—that the Father and the Son share equal status as fully God, but operate in different roles or functions, as if divine hierarchy somehow preserves unity while dividing responsibility. But here’s what troubles me: this framework isn’t something I find clearly taught in...

Thank you God Bless you All Always and Forever.

I understand that the subject of speaking in tongues can often be a source of confusion and misunderstanding. The purpose of tongues and their interpretation is not primarily for spreading the Gospel. Biblically, speaking in tongues serves multiple functions within the church, one of which is as...

It wouldn't being alone. But if Biblically followed and accompanied by Interpretation could possibly and has in my experience brought the entire congregation to the altar.

The question of whether modern tongues are genuine or “gibberish” often comes from a desire for authenticity and alignment with Scripture. In Acts 2 and 1 Corinthians 14, we see that the biblical gift of tongues had a purpose and structure: it was a real language that could be understood or...

The question of whether speaking in tongues and other spiritual gifts are still available today lies at the heart of a longstanding theological debate. On one side, cessationists argue that gifts like tongues and prophecy were specific to the apostolic age, serving as signs to confirm the...

That is a very good analogy, but I do see where it is faulty. We want to love God in ALL of who He is. The peel some don't like, the flesh almost everyone likes and the core almost everyone discards. One apple but still three different things or parts. Plus in seems confusing to pray to God one...

I have read through it very carefully and nowhere does it rationally explain how dividing God Internally still makes Him One. Division either Internally or externally no matter how anyone put it makes more than One. Unless you can explain it a little better.

Help me understand when a Trinitarian says "The Father is not the Son and the Son is not the Father" How are they not talking about two separate centers of consciousness? How is there still One God? And don't tell me like everyone else does that it's hard to understand. Give me a real rational...

As we consider the profound mystery of heaven and what it means to stand in the fullness of God’s presence, I’d like to ask for your perspective on a question central to our understanding of worship. Scripture speaks of the glorified Christ as possessing “the fullness of the Godhead bodily”...

Yes, but at the same time, they say He is not God the Father in Human form. Rather a different Person of God.

A central point of contention between Trinitarian and Oneness Pentecostals is the nature of the Sonship of Jesus Christ. Trinitarians assert that the Sonship is an eternal relationship within the Godhead, while Oneness Pentecostals often argue that it is a temporary state that will cease after...

Thank you for that. It makes sense to me. God Bless

That I agree on. It would just be nice if a brother is at fault to at least point out where and explain why. God bless and I am glad to be a part of this forum.

That is what my problem is. I am being told my Interpretation is misunderstood, but not telling me where or what is misunderstood. That way together we can seek the real Truth of Scripture.

When a post is directed toward me and not engaging on where my Interpretation is wrong, its a personal attack. For anyone to tell someone else they are wrong without addressing their Interpretation, Is just simply unproductive for ALL parties involved. We are here to seek the truth of his word...

I wish people could lay aside religion, denominational differences and just get down to the Word of God. All I am trying to do is what is highlighted below: (Which I have done) This means presenting your perspective with humility and respect, even when you disagree with someone else's...

When engaging in biblical discussions, it is essential to maintain a clear distinction between productive, respectful dialogue and unproductive, secular bickering. Biblical discussions should focus on understanding and interpreting scripture, aiming to edify and build each other up in faith...

I am fine with it being moved. And my response was not arguing in any way. Thank you

That is true. Like if someone said Christ was just an ordinary Man or Jesus isn't God's Son. Those would be serious issues.