Search results

Marriage is just as the Lord said it is. When the union occurs the man and woman become one flesh. The "Law of God" is unchanging. So you'll have to provide scripture to prove "God forbade the Jews from marrying non-Jewish women " Ill save you the trouble of work. Ruth! Blessings Always

Citing the source written mid first century doesn't point to an event that has already happened. Its only a record admission of a future event proving denial of Messiah Yeshua by its contemporary writing.

Seems the thread has veered off topic quite awhile now. From the the amount of apocrypha I've read I don't recall any of them pointing to Messiah

Again the whole context of the account given in galatians concerning circumcision involves more than the knowledge of men. Ive provided the scripture below to help further context concerning galatians 5:2 and the matters of circumcision that i spoke of before. There is nothing inherently wrong...

In acts 10 the "circumcised" party with and including kefa(peter are being distinguished from gentiles for the readers discernment. Circumcision is a physical sign or covenant between a male and The Most High. Something which would be very problematic for adult first generation believers...

Those that accused the people of being drunk(ards) had not received the gift, hence the animosity and slander. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/animosity This should be very clear in the plain(surface PRDeS reading of the account. Blessings Always

Abstaining from blood. Firstly is the ordinance against ingestion. Next is the ordinance against violence. Then is the ordinance against shedding innocent blood. Lastly would be an ordinance against rape and or adultry. 4 levels to each Blessings Always

I agree with the plausible exegesis that the same sect of pharisee that is mentioned in acts 15 are the ones that influenced the galatians. Because the common denominator is the false teaching of circumcision etc to be saved. Which was quelled at the council that ole sh'aul had attended in acts...

If you read into the text of acts 10:45 that "they of the circumcision which believed were astonished, as many as came with Peter" were the same as "sect of the Pharisees which believed" then that would be eisegesis.

I ve already commented. There is no gap in the Spirit of Torah Devarim(deuteronomy 10:17 https://bible.knowing-jesus.com/topics/God,-Impartiality-Of Blessed be The Holy One

Focus on the 4 ventricles as corners. Sheet and comfort.

https://theloveofgod.proboards.com/thread/5074/mishnot-1-2-pirkei-avot

And what is above the silver foundation ?

It doesn't point to salvation. Based on its tone of language the books were written in th 1900s

I haven't seen any dual house theology from edd,if Only a linguistic arguement. For example is the english definition of noble. Which definition do you chose according to exegesis? The choice reveals a tantamount treasure. no·ble /ˈnōbəl/ adjective 1. belonging to a hereditary class with...

Articulating distict cultural influential thought differences between hebrew and non hebrew is what I assumed you were attempting to communicate. Although there is no gap between the 2 in the spirit of Torah. Only a sing needle and thread woven in lovingkindnes during fellowship in oil reveals...

Do the words true, noble, and righteous remind you of spiritual armor?

Remember also, phillipians 4:8 [ In conclusion, brothers, focus your thoughts on what is true, noble, righteous, pure, lovable or admirable, on some virtue or on something praiseworthy.] Blessings Always

Your iron I'd rusting

A silver foundation